From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [pdx86-platform-drivers-x86:review-hans 46/59] kernel/stop_machine.c:638:35: error: call to undeclared function 'cpu_smt_mask'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 11:24:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zgjnw1bg.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202205120904.Gr9HEY5E-lkp@intel.com>
On Thu, May 12 2022 at 09:29, kernel test robot wrote:
>>> kernel/stop_machine.c:638:35: error: call to undeclared function 'cpu_smt_mask'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> const struct cpumask *smt_mask = cpu_smt_mask(cpu);
This warning with W=1 is not the worst of the problems.
The build will simply fail for CONFIG_SMP=y && CONFIG_SCHED_SMT=n
because cpu_smt_mask() cannot be resolved.
The other issue is CONFIG_SMP=n. This will fail to build the IFS driver
because stop_core_cpuslocked() is not available for SMP=n.
Something like the below should work as x86 selects SCHED_SMT when
SMP=y.
Thanks,
tglx
---
--- a/include/linux/stop_machine.h
+++ b/include/linux/stop_machine.h
@@ -156,6 +156,12 @@ static __always_inline int stop_machine_
}
static __always_inline int
+stop_core_cpuslocked(unsigned int cpu, cpu_stop_fn_t fn, void *data)
+{
+ return stop_machine_cpuslocked(fn, data, NULL);
+}
+
+static __always_inline int
stop_machine(cpu_stop_fn_t fn, void *data, const struct cpumask *cpus)
{
return stop_machine_cpuslocked(fn, data, cpus);
--- a/kernel/stop_machine.c
+++ b/kernel/stop_machine.c
@@ -631,6 +631,7 @@ int stop_machine(cpu_stop_fn_t fn, void
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(stop_machine);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
int stop_core_cpuslocked(unsigned int cpu, cpu_stop_fn_t fn, void *data)
{
const struct cpumask *smt_mask = cpu_smt_mask(cpu);
@@ -649,6 +650,7 @@ int stop_core_cpuslocked(unsigned int cp
return stop_cpus(smt_mask, multi_cpu_stop, &msdata);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(stop_core_cpuslocked);
+#endif
/**
* stop_machine_from_inactive_cpu - stop_machine() from inactive CPU
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-12 9:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-12 1:29 [pdx86-platform-drivers-x86:review-hans 46/59] kernel/stop_machine.c:638:35: error: call to undeclared function 'cpu_smt_mask'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations kernel test robot
2022-05-12 9:24 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2022-05-12 9:53 ` Hans de Goede
2022-05-12 11:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-12 13:40 ` Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zgjnw1bg.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).