llvm.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
	Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>,
	Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com>,
	Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
	Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
	"open list:SAMSUNG THERMAL DRIVER" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:SAMSUNG THERMAL DRIVER"
	<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"moderated list:ARM/SAMSUNG S3C,
	S5P AND EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:CLANG/LLVM BUILD SUPPORT:Keyword:b(?i:clang|llvm)b"
	<llvm@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] Exynos Thermal code improvement
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 15:28:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <92c2949e-2fc1-40e9-9dea-e3d9f7aa571d@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANAwSgSA-JHMRD7-19wijOY=TSWD-sv6yyrT=mH+wkUJuvxFAw@mail.gmail.com>

On 5/15/25 13:10, Anand Moon wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> On Wed, 14 May 2025 at 16:53, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 06:02:56PM +0530, Anand Moon wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>
>> Hi Anand,
>>
>> if the goal of the changes is to do cleanups, I recommend to rework
>> how the code is organized. Instead of having the data->soc check all
>> around the functions, write per platform functions and store them in
>> struct of_device_id data field instead of the soc version.
>>
>> Basically get rid of exynos_map_dt_data by settings the different ops
>> in a per platform structure.
>>
>> Then the initialization routine would be simpler to clean.
>>
> 
> Thanks, I had previously attempted this approach.
> The goal is to split the exynos_tmu_data structure to accommodate
> SoC-specific callbacks for initialization and configuration.
> 
> In my earlier attempt, I tried to refactor the code to achieve this.
> However, the main challenge I encountered was that the
> exynos_sensor_ops weren’t being correctly mapped for each SoC.
> 
> Some SoC have multiple sensor
> exynos4x12
>                      tmu: tmu@100c0000
> exynos5420
>                  tmu_cpu0: tmu@10060000
>                  tmu_cpu1: tmu@10064000
>                  tmu_cpu2: tmu@10068000
>                  tmu_cpu3: tmu@1006c000
>                  tmu_gpu: tmu@100a0000
>   exynos5433
>                  tmu_atlas0: tmu@10060000
>                  tmu_atlas1: tmu@10068000
>                  tmu_g3d: tmu@10070000
> exynos7
>                  tmu@10060000
> 
> It could be a design issue of the structure.or some DTS issue.
> So what I found in debugging it is not working correctly.
> 
> static const struct thermal_zone_device_ops exynos_sensor_ops = {
>          .get_temp = exynos_get_temp,
>          .set_emul_temp = exynos_tmu_set_emulation,
>          .set_trips = exynos_set_trips,
> };
> 
> The sensor callback will not return a valid pointer and soc id for the get_temp.
> 
> Here is my earlier version of local changes.
> [1] https://pastebin.com/bbEP04Zh exynos_tmu.c
> [2] https://pastebin.com/PzNz5yve Odroid U3 dmesg.log
> [3] https://pastebin.com/4Yjt2d2u    Odroid Xu4 dmesg.log
> 
> I want to re-model the structure to improve the code.
> Once Its working condition I will send this for review.
> 
> If you have some suggestions please let me know.

I suggest to do the conversion step by step beginning by 
exynos4210_tmu_clear_irqs, then by exynos_map_dt_data as the first 
cleanup iteration


-- 
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-15 13:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-30 12:32 [PATCH v6 0/4] Exynos Thermal code improvement Anand Moon
2025-04-30 12:32 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] thermal/drivers/exynos: Refactor clk_sec initialization inside SOC-specific case Anand Moon
2025-04-30 12:32 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] thermal/drivers/exynos: Use devm_clk_get_enabled() helpers Anand Moon
     [not found]   ` <CGME20250702120029eucas1p21cb8337b313f134047817c2e5d5790b8@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2025-07-02 12:00     ` Mateusz Majewski
2025-04-30 12:32 ` [PATCH v6 3/4] thermal/drivers/exynos: Remove redundant IS_ERR() checks for clk_sec clock Anand Moon
2025-04-30 12:33 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] thermal/drivers/exynos: Fixed the efuse min max value for exynos5422 Anand Moon
2025-05-08  6:14 ` [PATCH v6 0/4] Exynos Thermal code improvement Anand Moon
2025-05-08  6:26   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-05-08 11:36     ` Anand Moon
2025-05-14 11:23 ` Daniel Lezcano
2025-05-15 11:10   ` Anand Moon
2025-05-15 13:28     ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2025-05-15 18:01       ` Anand Moon
2025-05-16 14:45         ` Daniel Lezcano
2025-05-17 19:41           ` Anand Moon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=92c2949e-2fc1-40e9-9dea-e3d9f7aa571d@linaro.org \
    --to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
    --cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --cc=justinstitt@google.com \
    --cc=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux.amoon@gmail.com \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
    --cc=morbo@google.com \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).