From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "kernel test robot" <lkp@intel.com>,
"Bean Huo" <beanhuo@iokpp.de>,
avri.altman@sandisk.com, "Bart Van Assche" <bvanassche@acm.org>,
"Alim Akhtar" <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
can.guo@oss.qualcomm.com, "Bean Huo" <beanhuo@micron.com>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: core: Fix link error when CONFIG_RPMB=m
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2025 15:39:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <98ac8e0b-6027-4f6d-b5cf-b9ad9c856ecf@app.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202512031316.SvDwnvhy-lkp@intel.com>
On Wed, Dec 3, 2025, at 07:15, kernel test robot wrote:
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
>>> drivers/ufs/core/ufs-rpmb.c:135:5: error: redefinition of 'ufs_rpmb_probe'
> 135 | int ufs_rpmb_probe(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> | ^
> drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd-priv.h:445:19: note: previous definition is here
> 445 | static inline int ufs_rpmb_probe(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> | ^
>>> drivers/ufs/core/ufs-rpmb.c:234:6: error: redefinition of 'ufs_rpmb_remove'
The declaration and definitio are inconsistent: the former is inside of
an #ifdef block, the latter is not. I think either way works, but it
needs to be the same for both.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-03 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20251130151508.3076994-1-beanhuo@iokpp.de>
2025-12-03 6:15 ` [PATCH] scsi: ufs: core: Fix link error when CONFIG_RPMB=m kernel test robot
2025-12-03 14:39 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2025-12-03 16:23 ` Bean Huo
2025-12-03 20:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=98ac8e0b-6027-4f6d-b5cf-b9ad9c856ecf@app.fastmail.com \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=avri.altman@sandisk.com \
--cc=beanhuo@iokpp.de \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=can.guo@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox