From: Vincent MAILHOL <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>, Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/asm/bitops: ffs: use __builtin_ffs to evaluate constant expressions
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 08:30:45 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMZ6Rq+d_eKXQQZ1p-yUpqC-SOjpa83o_QpZci-GN9qd9UKa5g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <324f245e-15e2-a1f2-bc8a-46255a1a859f@wanadoo.fr>
On Thu. 12 May 2022 at 05:56, Christophe JAILLET
<christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> Le 11/05/2022 à 18:03, Vincent Mailhol a écrit :
> > For x86_64, the current ffs() implementation does not produce
> > optimized code when called with a constant expression. On the
> > contrary, the __builtin_ffs() function of both GCC and clang is able
> > to simplify the expression into a single instruction.
> >
>
> [...]
>
> >
> > ** Statistics **
> >
> > On a allyesconfig, before applying this patch...:
> >
> > | $ objdump -d vmlinux.o | grep bsf | wc -l
> > | 3607
> >
> > ...and after:
> >
> > | $ objdump -d vmlinux.o | grep bsf | wc -l
> > | 792
> >
> > So, roughly 26.7% of the call to ffs() were using constant expression
> > and were optimized out.
> >
> >
> nitpicking: numbers look odd.
And they are. Thanks for spotting the issue.
> 3607 is the exact same number as in patch 2/2. (ok, could be)
> 26.7% is surprising with these numbers. (I guess it is (total_before
> - remaining) / total_before x 100 = (3607-792)/36.07 = 78.0%)
The 3607 is incorrect (copy/paste issue, sorry). The correct figure is
1081. And:
(1081-792)/1081 = 26.7%
Will amend the comment and send v3 right away.
> (but patch looks great to me :)
Thanks! :)
> CJ
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-11 23:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-11 16:03 [PATCH v2 0/2] x86/asm/bitops: optimize ff{s,z} functions for constant expressions Vincent Mailhol
2022-05-11 16:03 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/asm/bitops: ffs: use __builtin_ffs to evaluate " Vincent Mailhol
2022-05-11 20:56 ` Christophe JAILLET
2022-05-11 23:30 ` Vincent MAILHOL [this message]
2022-05-11 21:35 ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-05-11 23:48 ` Vincent MAILHOL
2022-05-11 16:03 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/asm/bitops: __ffs,ffz: use __builtin_ctzl " Vincent Mailhol
2022-05-11 22:20 ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-05-11 23:23 ` Vincent MAILHOL
2022-05-12 0:03 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] x86/asm/bitops: optimize ff{s,z} functions for " Vincent Mailhol
2022-05-12 0:03 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/asm/bitops: ffs: use __builtin_ffs to evaluate " Vincent Mailhol
2022-05-12 0:28 ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-05-12 1:18 ` Vincent MAILHOL
2022-05-12 0:03 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] x86/asm/bitops: __ffs,ffz: use __builtin_ctzl " Vincent Mailhol
2022-05-12 0:19 ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-05-12 1:18 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] x86/asm/bitops: optimize ff{s,z} functions for " Vincent Mailhol
2022-05-12 1:18 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] x86/asm/bitops: ffs: use __builtin_ffs to evaluate " Vincent Mailhol
2022-05-12 3:02 ` Joe Perches
2022-05-12 4:29 ` Vincent MAILHOL
2022-05-12 1:18 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] x86/asm/bitops: __ffs,ffz: use __builtin_ctzl " Vincent Mailhol
2022-05-23 9:22 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] x86/asm/bitops: optimize ff{s,z} functions for " Vincent MAILHOL
2022-06-25 7:26 ` [RESEND PATCH " Vincent Mailhol
2022-06-25 7:26 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 1/2] x86/asm/bitops: ffs: use __builtin_ffs to evaluate " Vincent Mailhol
2022-06-25 7:26 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 2/2] x86/asm/bitops: __ffs,ffz: use __builtin_ctzl " Vincent Mailhol
2022-07-23 15:15 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 0/2] x86/asm/bitops: optimize ff{s,z} functions for " Vincent Mailhol
2022-07-23 15:15 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 1/2] x86/asm/bitops: ffs: use __builtin_ffs to evaluate " Vincent Mailhol
2022-08-11 14:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-12 11:55 ` Vincent MAILHOL
2022-07-23 15:15 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 2/2] x86/asm/bitops: __ffs,ffz: use __builtin_ctzl " Vincent Mailhol
2022-07-29 11:24 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 0/2] x86/asm/bitops: optimize ff{s,z} functions for " Vincent MAILHOL
2022-07-29 12:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-07-29 13:50 ` Vincent MAILHOL
2022-08-12 11:44 ` [PATCH v5 " Vincent Mailhol
2022-08-12 11:44 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] x86/asm/bitops: ffs: use __builtin_ffs to evaluate " Vincent Mailhol
2022-08-12 11:44 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] x86/asm/bitops: __ffs,ffz: use __builtin_ctzl " Vincent Mailhol
2022-08-23 16:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-23 17:12 ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-08-23 17:43 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-23 20:31 ` Vincent MAILHOL
2022-08-24 8:43 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-24 12:10 ` Vincent MAILHOL
2022-08-24 13:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-26 21:32 ` Vincent MAILHOL
2022-09-07 4:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-09-07 5:35 ` Vincent MAILHOL
2022-09-07 8:50 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-31 7:57 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] x86/asm/bitops: optimize ff{s,z} functions for " Vincent Mailhol
2022-08-31 7:57 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] x86/asm/bitops: ffs: use __builtin_ffs to evaluate " Vincent Mailhol
2022-08-31 7:57 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] x86/asm/bitops: __ffs,ffz: use __builtin_ctzl " Vincent Mailhol
2022-08-31 8:51 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] x86/asm/bitops: optimize ff{s,z} functions for " Yury Norov
2022-09-01 3:49 ` Yury Norov
2022-09-01 10:30 ` Vincent MAILHOL
2022-09-01 14:19 ` Yury Norov
2022-09-01 17:06 ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-09-02 5:34 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-09-02 0:41 ` Vincent MAILHOL
2022-09-02 1:19 ` Vincent MAILHOL
2022-09-05 0:37 ` [PATCH v7 " Vincent Mailhol
2022-09-05 0:37 ` [PATCH v7 1/2] x86/asm/bitops: ffs: use __builtin_ffs to evaluate " Vincent Mailhol
2022-09-05 0:37 ` [PATCH v7 2/2] x86/asm/bitops: __ffs,ffz: use __builtin_ctzl " Vincent Mailhol
2022-09-06 18:26 ` [PATCH v7 0/2] x86/asm/bitops: optimize ff{s,z} functions for " Nick Desaulniers
2022-09-07 7:04 ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-09-07 7:49 ` Vincent MAILHOL
2022-09-07 9:09 ` [PATCH v8 " Vincent Mailhol
2022-09-07 9:09 ` [PATCH v8 1/2] x86/asm/bitops: ffs: use __builtin_ffs to evaluate " Vincent Mailhol
2022-09-07 9:09 ` [PATCH v8 2/2] x86/asm/bitops: __ffs,ffz: use __builtin_ctzl " Vincent Mailhol
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAMZ6Rq+d_eKXQQZ1p-yUpqC-SOjpa83o_QpZci-GN9qd9UKa5g@mail.gmail.com \
--to=mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=trix@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).