From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ej1-f44.google.com (mail-ej1-f44.google.com [209.85.218.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D4EE3AA4F8 for ; Mon, 4 May 2026 14:05:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.218.44 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777903554; cv=none; b=WSpXt+ADqfv8qElNcOv7ZDYyokATAH9jwp86NeBwZ+DZZHhOfWhF7/EqWvlYIdnUW7kYH0Ibbx34J5stcPhIkVgtjSPyzoZA77EjtxIXOlSUw1Haxu8nlF27rVjldk1ynqp8bnXnc/g0hkRXIZZm/KGwsWSg4ynZiwjzGDMLIb8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777903554; c=relaxed/simple; bh=puUQpxpOOMqnVd2eFLdmJ7ba/xPE6klpnVs5liK0em8=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:To:From:Subject:Cc: References:In-Reply-To; b=tMH0y5QgXhiOwBXHm3VUzKm7j1vaHMLfbzvzj/LGDoQjNMwYA8bjVLBfHekQ7NmDcYjCfhMP4jHXVJpsKrl8X3eUFpogsamtKrbjSNO8cYACEnEVLngELwkU7etq0vDIzWY1BppOPkr754LbuLgMxl3WvkzPDZD4umbXE6Btjco= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b=f2rfhhy5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.218.44 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b="f2rfhhy5" Received: by mail-ej1-f44.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-bb3c4d8cc29so659031666b.1 for ; Mon, 04 May 2026 07:05:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=google; t=1777903552; x=1778508352; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=in-reply-to:references:cc:subject:from:to:message-id:date :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=qxH/n2fmjxOiVX9boi8Uf5ZeGO40PmkXCnUi1eKqyXY=; b=f2rfhhy57/GyAfm5aMJWRrU8RtthzRQGGZJvxxwFGL45PWqwWsl5RO6pu07XIITzum gqs+4Xlxo1IjNcu4CA/pavt8yr8QeCKn0w+YCcu1E/V5rzXf0VifwdQj1ikVtBr0KnS5 pbk0cDouHCFx2AuK2yBqbrGf835NAvAOMrVR1fdWmNHCCw8eyyNOPR1GFkedX5S4gG9y /uVHJA7/qO3a3RTSYT694/m9Or59N4zAU0nxgAY8TW2yjS5X1e67liRQBSauH7nEHfpc CAOItXTAPG85rdn5arZMoyN/IKHPsdHaEprfcEISMvvpetLjUHggkZ+/zFdlk1jS6Y6E 4lgQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1777903552; x=1778508352; h=in-reply-to:references:cc:subject:from:to:message-id:date :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=qxH/n2fmjxOiVX9boi8Uf5ZeGO40PmkXCnUi1eKqyXY=; b=UH3ukX9RqU8GtqS1UxrU2nlswWtZ37RX4HN2eORFywfZ+GC++QZjBoz9m5gwLQL3W0 HYpIJ5RFEcVaxPA70qJl70mOftj7rBhQeJsrlTD+klkC96P9GtG6N5gLJU/eaeY2XCFF SeDsmCc+2hRI7XSftZPUXB7LIGBL650PWURzv2FgsChKdkmQaWXkDae533MDly59V9Zq e9TBi0cK4rUPcTQaIAq/LRaidtmLksozZZVsp0KLXqefNpC2XDeU63iuRyoWVKie+wES M60CksD7aVVE2ciPNcnqKUeK2efA4StsEmxQYnG6+S88R0Fs9yvwM37ou6WuLeiTQ3tT elIA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AFNElJ/H6fWR0CrP1MLDDyTfzU67fTEztyfhF0R/bez3BmHOVmstpu+0N+RmflEXmgoEZAkHSXKY@lists.linux.dev X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz/ICEc9pw1VJWVu18YnWQoGgjO9f8bqFyuAkD+aldl6EPisoAq EKx04Y7lsixEP7ILXlme0fcyeKUF1+Q7oKfQj35tFD0WQoZvFl4LFuGORMQRE0MjsWo= X-Gm-Gg: AeBDieuSmYK56CsyjVLHjG39/Sjm/zhleiOc7XWRV46X62A19EVIKlM6FDSXj7X5eWe JNo6RXX2RYNWgcYD51vqi2aJt+MQ/FXibpDt2pIVDKlqUt3BwbpZ9G9THeJRc9NlYfcHYF6khXR jxG2/wjf/ELUUWfEXkGpcW4dalPzrNFz52BdjCGXSXebv5p3+TTPgvTBwpoyCwgUG4+3CiEwLEk 3us8ovDoIzsmXn2oPNKVqqjR3UGLltHNFMqIr8BWZtDccX7ZyBiuQgXr7GW6wVsRD6U6ztFP858 dob0TqRopbMDZ4p/56HAf23u7vaAsd4lGWmIzpJIUWftn+me61c+0RMoUqs1lCgCnah47oq4zdp u//TF18komDCllANbRYdpnNyDCevqPHJ22BeB410hsZivhFS/58g2dUDmFyaF9QXO2Jfvzu2rbY /d9BeRXKNVxmeGAJWdL1Yf0Q== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:3cd4:b0:bad:d530:dbf7 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-bbffd6c43bbmr534556066b.32.1777903551577; Mon, 04 May 2026 07:05:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2804:7f0:b765:1294:2ecf:67ff:fe81:9da0]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 71dfb90a1353d-574a6ee0b24sm6221372e0c.16.2026.05.04.07.05.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 04 May 2026 07:05:50 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Mon, 04 May 2026 11:05:49 -0300 Message-Id: To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , From: =?utf-8?b?UmljYXJkbyBCLiBNYXJsacOocmU=?= Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v11 01/11] selftests/bpf: Add BPF_STRICT_BUILD toggle Cc: , , , , , , , X-Mailer: aerc 0.21.0-120-g22b95d38161f References: <20260430-selftests-bpf_misconfig-v11-1-e11f7a8c4fdc@suse.com> <62fa35211e90c3961079550e6b826dd1bee301e86838a03ab15cb0b4a631aa8d@mail.kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <62fa35211e90c3961079550e6b826dd1bee301e86838a03ab15cb0b4a631aa8d@mail.kernel.org> On Thu Apr 30, 2026 at 1:41 PM -03, bot+bpf-ci wrote: >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selfte= sts/bpf/Makefile >> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile >> @@ -44,6 +44,12 @@ >> SKIP_LIBBFD ?=3D >> SKIP_CRYPTO ?=3D >> >> +# When BPF_STRICT_BUILD is 1, any BPF object, skeleton, test object, or >> +# benchmark compilation failure is fatal. Set to 0 to tolerate failures >> +# and continue building the remaining tests. >> +BPF_STRICT_BUILD ?=3D 1 >> +PERMISSIVE :=3D $(filter 0,$(BPF_STRICT_BUILD)) > ^^^^ > > The PERMISSIVE variable is defined here but never used anywhere in the > Makefile. The commit message claims "subsequent Makefile rules use to > make individual build steps non-fatal," but a search through the file > shows PERMISSIVE only appears at this definition line. > > This makes the BPF_STRICT_BUILD=3D0 option documented in the commit messa= ge > non-functional. Users following the provided example will expect permissi= ve > mode to work, but it has no actual effect. > > Should this commit include the Makefile rules that actually use PERMISSIV= E, > or is this feature incomplete? Users of this come later in the series. Kept as standalone commit for improving readability a bit. > > > --- > AI reviewed your patch. Please fix the bug or email reply why it's not a = bug. > See: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/claude/READM= E.md > > CI run summary: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/251764= 31268