From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>,
Quan Nguyen <quan@os.amperecomputing.com>,
linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
llvm@lists.linux.dev, patches@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] hwmon: (smpro-hwmon) Add missing break in smpro_is_visible()
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 14:03:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y1ryPDF4CD+6gIMY@dev-arch.thelio-3990X> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221027210016.GA1938309@roeck-us.net>
On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 02:00:16PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 12:52:38PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > Clang warns:
> >
> > drivers/hwmon/smpro-hwmon.c:378:2: error: unannotated fall-through between switch labels [-Werror,-Wimplicit-fallthrough]
> > default:
> > ^
> > drivers/hwmon/smpro-hwmon.c:378:2: note: insert 'break;' to avoid fall-through
> > default:
> > ^
> > break;
> > 1 error generated.
> >
> > Clang is a little more pedantic than GCC, which does not warn when
> > falling through to a case that is just break or return. Clang's version
> > is more in line with the kernel's own stance in deprecated.rst, which
> > states that all switch/case blocks must end in either break,
> > fallthrough, continue, goto, or return. Add the missing break to silence
> > the warning.
> >
> > Fixes: a87456864cbb ("hwmon: Add Ampere's Altra smpro-hwmon driver")
> > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1751
> > Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/hwmon/smpro-hwmon.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/smpro-hwmon.c b/drivers/hwmon/smpro-hwmon.c
> > index ee54e21c2c12..667e88b6bae5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hwmon/smpro-hwmon.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/smpro-hwmon.c
> > @@ -375,6 +375,7 @@ static umode_t smpro_is_visible(const void *data, enum hwmon_sensor_types type,
> > return 0;
> > break;
> > }
> > + break;
>
> The alignment of the break; statement above is also bad, and a default:
> for switch (attr) is missing.
Would you prefer those fixed in the same patch or a separate one?
> > default:
> > break;
> > }
> >
> > base-commit: 0ffb687b6508c36a17b99bdaf014b38532404182
> > --
> > 2.38.1
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-27 21:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-27 19:52 [PATCH -next] hwmon: (smpro-hwmon) Add missing break in smpro_is_visible() Nathan Chancellor
2022-10-27 21:00 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-10-27 21:03 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2022-10-27 22:25 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y1ryPDF4CD+6gIMY@dev-arch.thelio-3990X \
--to=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=quan@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=trix@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox