From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pj1-f54.google.com (mail-pj1-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF29815CBB for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 22:13:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pj1-f54.google.com with SMTP id e7-20020a17090a77c700b00216928a3917so168349pjs.4 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 14:13:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=4AX85xZR/Z+/BFidSsN8cuPlIss1GzSZ5O8aUvSnWk0=; b=qtAroXIgR/kdmdgCvSWoRUBWUO7Q0R2oetA+DSgo8Im+qMa/WgDIzDI593eVDOfjmp /YNDGl7b6PbGXNqPzfD0FYgqkIGyDLdO86xQISGNXBMAGCXQuwwtVGVVEez+EP+fv2YT zEQKRaATTkqUxQrcsN0JxSecjm28Y7LeWESKEVAyR9T/wWVJF8MbJvxjjbNRQ2D+aCP3 kyuy2Nz8vKEQvRzjE6We5EvrQZh7e5sd8wWjPyBazcOmKlUC/RA83uyT7heG/aZy8O8t QOUrE61bK1vgJYcSRRaY5D2iOxjwH6flA1rp/3fPzc5EB3D0BNxCi6I04NseacqdYRTz v75Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=4AX85xZR/Z+/BFidSsN8cuPlIss1GzSZ5O8aUvSnWk0=; b=hJLrDWQe4QyrkpggsSwbdb0JVdXgMsZtnEHpwUpgl/Q4+2E6giYqha1fWvQb0Gj7hL HpTGPJY1gZ73fejbwKDvIbZ5ny3M8O0brd7jeeI7N8rJ6yW4bGzL3ta999ZMupCRi1EL lcpUokBYFWOwxgKfZMO41C85EprUEav+up2GiaaVrKxo83PekzUyEA4f47EyS3FNC7ve TXnQiPzPfhYKanKdnv0Z3ptAxYr1ntksmS3ujNmnJyI3gkmm0axJcaefwm5MadUzrvld 0FzQfhhzCNJOEvcdpyHczWLwa0AUoH0UQzgT+kkWYterUhkLv/WS66/XnKO7leZX3u54 gSiQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pl5yboKxKcG1Q/ghOyTD/Basqj7hdORyVtJWF8jAhSC5fSuLT5i U+XAxD6fzpnprIzoZKo9g/c= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf7SSV5Spx3SdIMHV/m3SHtcgR2doOiXV0pHeCoiNsvfzayliCTA8GTupUvJ8yUHKFE/rHkUJA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:e2c5:b0:214:1648:687d with SMTP id fr5-20020a17090ae2c500b002141648687dmr34036143pjb.78.1669155199951; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 14:13:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from google.com ([2620:15c:9d:2:af8d:6047:29d5:446c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g6-20020a170902868600b0018703bf42desm12536214plo.159.2022.11.22.14.13.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 22 Nov 2022 14:13:18 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 14:13:15 -0800 From: Dmitry Torokhov To: Raul Rangel Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Andy Shevchenko , ACPI Devel Maling List , linux-input , Hans de Goede , Mika Westerberg , Mario Limonciello , Tim Van Patten , Linus Walleij , "jingle.wu" , Dan Williams , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jonathan Cameron , Len Brown , Nathan Chancellor , Nick Desaulniers , Terry Bowman , Tom Rix , Linux Kernel Mailing List , llvm@lists.linux.dev, Alexis Savery Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 06/13] ACPI: resources: Add wake_capable parameter to acpi_dev_irq_flags Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 11:36:07AM -0700, Raul Rangel wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 8:53 AM Raul Rangel wrote: > > > > On Sat, Oct 15, 2022 at 10:56 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 7:55 PM Dmitry Torokhov > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 08:42:13PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 07:13:37PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 1:22 AM Dmitry Torokhov > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > > I think that patches [5-8/13] from this series are significant > > > > > > framework changes, so it would make sense to route them via the ACPI > > > > > > tree. > > > > > > > > > > > > If this is fine with everybody, I will queue them up for merging into > > > > > > 6.1 (probably in the second half of the upcoming merge window). > > > > > > > > > > I believe it's fine from GPIO ACPI perspective (there shouldn't be conflict, > > > > > but if you wish you always may take this PR [1] to your tree (it's already in > > > > > GPIO tree pending v6.1), it may be considered as immutable tag. > > > > > > > > > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-gpio/Yym%2Fj+Y9MBOIhWtK@black.fi.intel.com/ > > > > > > > > Yeah, having an immutable branch hanging off 6.0-rcN would be awesome - > > > > I could pull it and this would avoid any potential conflicts later. > > > > > > This material is in the mainline now, but the branch is still there in > > > case you need it: > > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git \ > > > acpi-wakeup > > > > > > It won't be necessary any more after 6.1-rc1 is out, though, I suppose. > > > > > > > Awesome, thanks for merging in the ACPI patches! > > Dmitry, > What are the next steps to getting the I2C patches landed? Should I > push out a new series that's rebased on 6.1-rc1? Everything should be applied now and will be in 6.2. Thanks. -- Dmitry