From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EFC91366; Sun, 15 Jan 2023 14:14:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 73752C433D2; Sun, 15 Jan 2023 14:14:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1673792069; bh=EvGEQ7u39+taKoDMf5d9jjV5Rwv8HCE3B95mKlhXVr8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=zn1rkTI8QJ5BKucDQQcgS71svB8c75bujhU7AyQstnrIj8SMa28y0YtuOeu86DKZc iysF491gHLjbkzWULrBXHdRKIB6Fa3wdlXtITG+9pao/Bz/bHhql/R83vCvAvO1Eli EtxONBvJgNIY4GiH9E3S7RvPDmCKuqtUljm9t2+o= Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2023 15:14:27 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Sergio Paracuellos Cc: =?utf-8?B?QXLEsW7DpyDDnE5BTA==?= , kernel test robot , llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [stable:linux-5.15.y 1642/9999] ERROR: Input tree has errors, aborting (use -f to force output) Message-ID: References: <202301150959.RAvfuBjG-lkp@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 01:52:58PM +0100, Sergio Paracuellos wrote: > On Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 10:05 AM Arınç ÜNAL wrote: > > > > Sergio, this issue hasn't seem to gone away. If you haven't sent the > > patch you mentioned here [1], I think Greg taking your upstream commit > > [2] to 5.15.y tree would be the easiest solution. > > > > [1]: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAMhs-H8BLheXBc+BcDH_PKmDg+_bWF9OmiS_grw1mO+RxW+J8Q@mail.gmail.com/ > > [2]: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next.git/commit/drivers/staging/mt7621-dts/mt7621.dtsi?id=ce835dbd04d7b24f9fd50d9a9c59be46304aaa8a > > I forgot I sent [2] at some point :). Yes, taking directly that patch > sounds easier. This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the stable kernel tree. Please read: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html for how to do this properly.