From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 775472F2D; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 14:23:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3B43EC433D2; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 14:23:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1673965432; bh=u56oOvHn1abIyGGrd813HPzm5FZKrLOcjdyEY+gy1tk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=B6jxdyArFoI74Ae425v1M1ZkQR5oSOZ5P4lNU6uYN47WaGkAqNUUAkcCDbh+CJJyT AOdGgePV6RFQgXyD8fB7AwSgIeH+hnyvUJwEHv12R5xrkO5SYCeCd3du2Qigm8BWRg 5WhfR2wxDdYCLj0FTXyJ4BBPwnWW9TK9lBNxIGHk2cCGjMHXqW5LIsuQf/X3JspzL9 t9K9dqorJ7m4VKRAPuzLkEIA9vUjVVgnYmQexbebDaFX1dooRs5YeL0/9bf+SKOVwN /Sy5NSsLiPLMOVlroArNsiLWJmLvA20tiyRdmzow7++yAdGfikECAd6z0gvFKxOBEK DZZPgWoyPz32w== Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 07:23:49 -0700 From: Nathan Chancellor To: Naresh Kamboju Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, llvm@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/86] 5.15.89-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20230116154747.036911298@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Hi Naresh, On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 04:57:52PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 at 21:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.89 release. > > There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Wed, 18 Jan 2023 15:47:28 +0000. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.89-rc1.gz > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > Results from Linaro’s test farm. > No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. > > Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing > > NOTE: > clang-nightly build errors noticed on defconfig of arm64. arm. x86_64, > i386, riscv, s390 and powerpc. > > include/trace/events/initcall.h:38:3: error: 'struct (unnamed at > include/trace/events/initcall.h:27:1)' cannot be defined in > '__builtin_offsetof' > __field_struct(initcall_t, func) > ^ > include/trace/events/initcall.h:38:3: error: initializer element is > not a compile-time constant > __field_struct(initcall_t, func) > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Thanks for the report! I sent backports to avoid this issue and the one reported on the 5.4 review but it appears they did not make this round of stable updates. https://lore.kernel.org/Y8TWrJpb6Vn6E4+v@dev-arch.thelio-3990X/ Hopefully it will be cleared up next round. Cheers, Nathan