From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ed1-f47.google.com (mail-ed1-f47.google.com [209.85.208.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 587A03FCB for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 13:38:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ed1-f47.google.com with SMTP id b26so21067284edt.0 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 06:38:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chrisdown.name; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Vfh9KgsSP5BS01eoNyHXbYSyVcws0Zy+EOjKOnp3P8E=; b=OrR/WvkvrCcU2JkTzAR28z5yCEBU6NmpL8A9PQ/OezThMZ73yeCPVAWA25UTs+q1y5 rWcmEX3ByfwWpUUT1+3lMYA7uvsWMbE8cClXS18a/aICVYB0l73Mw8ZWHpd9xJic4FSy xrqHvHJqnT+FmJOExmkX4OwVoJU8Pkne59NCo= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Vfh9KgsSP5BS01eoNyHXbYSyVcws0Zy+EOjKOnp3P8E=; b=w/plO+8EdyhYIURgJZyTBNIaxlDplclWP893AWWE9+7n2lNIGgc5xhDJuKB9GamiDx CeQb4YUedW97jclVbzlGLWihnSLNYl2xWa8yOAOUKcLf/Ww6eW9kIJVAd6ScCnapK/K2 FvUKo3rZWxNJ50+0RoluosgCnP3H01vyMoJ3wXIh+/hNyZD3vtL5z4Pi+Cj+R4LoBEVL qIdijrcsHpWBigmK0NVST5YyjDDT66oZLKEGcTuTCq8oPEV2C5ghoilSqpXBwER/9PKK cbkMlj5Sq3qGaeGf6Ag6ASjQHEiUBtWTmONRBCeDkE+WkKq3tFZwkOBpOfTPFsiSKyP9 exnw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530K0FPU5YBJwCBDuKLuN7+VE7Ceq7HCZuySQ6bXDnluBPPOvGuJ C3s6nRTUzfgVKxnknMpJKbaCqA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw8T4czYppZUGA/cNfzdAv8mXU5pSwjFFaXF8JTL2wc1biR2uhah7881crI+rmaqRn6SGsN9Q== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c2d3:: with SMTP id m19mr5923709edp.267.1632749898737; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 06:38:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2620:10d:c093:400::5:6664]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u19sm10910035edv.40.2021.09.27.06.38.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 27 Sep 2021 06:38:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 14:38:17 +0100 From: Chris Down To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Petr Mladek , Sergey Senozhatsky , Andy Shevchenko , Jessica Yu , Arnd Bergmann , Steven Rostedt , John Ogness , Nathan Chancellor , Nick Desaulniers , YueHaibing , Linux Kernel Mailing List , llvm@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: avoid -Wsometimes-uninitialized warning Message-ID: References: <20210927125007.1581919-1-arnd@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/2.1.3 (987dde4c) (2021-09-10) To be clear, I appreciate that some tradeoffs need to be made for the nice warnings that clang gives -- and to that extent I'm ambivalent to the patch -- but I object to "Fixes:" for something that doesn't fix anything at all.