From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1EE8168 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 00:16:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 361A8C36AE0; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 00:16:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1641514592; bh=OfWvjgMz/3A2cIrWooPNudV7uT9VchsrhR5VhQdH8dY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=soRh/bTmEiDBwxCHqevgGU3/fdavQHU24UxRQTjfUtXb7JO/wMUwf48N1HOl/IH3n VU2yg3yrwiQDFjhMs47yHKhbqolAHqGBOl/0pyvo24POpX7YLDzbXkZz0Rpg/ufW2C nZvMnM9ocIgL7yr2Q4IeS3c2zwuHCzj3TF84A9oo5k5X0Zq01bpcoGHUwCuXCMPSsH 4DQFGtRINjGlkGuiHQQqKZUJFucR+J+Bu/gm3E6qyIv2cghrXZfQ79BJvbvR0BecEk XyGzG4Bg6BdzgkMI0Tm+0dnqcT4De+LebwYHo01kwobUBqPnldzGPq0OF/4aJ9O4z5 MdsHT4qeNKfJw== Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2022 17:16:27 -0700 From: Nathan Chancellor To: Samuel Zeter Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Nick Desaulniers , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev, Masami Hiramatsu Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] *** Fix reformat_objdump.awk *** Message-ID: References: <20220106023606.283953-1-samuelzeter@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 10:23:07AM +1100, Samuel Zeter wrote: > Thanks for the feedback, Nathan. > > > For the future, I recommend putting the maintainers in the "To" field, > > rather than "Cc", to ensure they actually see it. Additionally, I see > > some small nits in the commit message that the tip maintainers might > > comment on, see > > > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-tip.html#changelog > > > Thanks for the link, I missed that one. What were the nits apparent to you > in the commit message? I primarily just saw a couple instances of "This patch", which is frowned upon in the main submitting patches document: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#submittingpatches I thought I saw something else but upon further inspection, I didn't. It is minor enough that I would wait for further review comments from others to submit a v2. Cheers, Nathan