From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [90.155.50.34])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A35B46B8
	for <llvm@lists.linux.dev>; Sat, 30 Apr 2022 09:09:17 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:
	References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:
	Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description;
	bh=fmjKi3vzk5o50Dip5Ph0Bmr/f1E5Lj21/lbWqEwgHkk=; b=gP2jQek7ogrpQN1C4MXnP7aih6
	9MpJEvWzvlOJpxul3NuvKTM+1Aymo8v2WKGSWeTkjPuh9j5Kx6oalC9wJePh3SCBiQauChsIADQ2p
	awHTCsB7ByqI2tgdiudUdNwUPwJefZVeg1l4ofe5iiqvmn8WItr7C/7gjnoGx4MI1PTeAEK+Kce1l
	m1YgnfIbhxGraj+tYK/82m+XakPv3zCiqhetcFWQppvw2k+nTdjPrw9LuFPQL2QdjLx1kxy4K5nOQ
	HB4Fh5lHfvGCgodgr2tGjwSaUNzWQ3LPB+VFSFE1iRiJMLzYHDAcxE15A3g/1tBSl/kbjQgvf7UpB
	oaxIK3rA==;
Received: from j217100.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.217.100] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net)
	by casper.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux))
	id 1nkj69-00DDvg-Aj; Sat, 30 Apr 2022 09:09:05 +0000
Received: from hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net [192.168.1.225])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60B393001EA;
	Sat, 30 Apr 2022 11:09:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 256252028EFE6; Sat, 30 Apr 2022 11:09:03 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 11:09:03 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>, x86@kernel.org,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	Joao Moreira <joao@overdrivepizza.com>,
	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 06/21] cfi: Switch to -fsanitize=kcfi
Message-ID: <Ymz8rwWGjkVCfMZ1@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20220429203644.2868448-1-samitolvanen@google.com>
 <20220429203644.2868448-7-samitolvanen@google.com>
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev
List-Id: <llvm.lists.linux.dev>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:llvm+subscribe@lists.linux.dev>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:llvm+unsubscribe@lists.linux.dev>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220429203644.2868448-7-samitolvanen@google.com>

On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 01:36:29PM -0700, Sami Tolvanen wrote:

> +CC_FLAGS_CFI	:= -fsanitize=kcfi -fno-sanitize-blacklist

I'm somewhat surprised to see CFI is a sanitizer. It just doesn't seem
to fit in the line of {UB,KC,KA}SAN and friends.