Re: [PATCH v4 15/25] KVM: VMX: Extend VMX controls macro shenanigans

[Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>]

On Fri, Jul 22, 2022, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 06:33:27PM +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 14, 2022, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
> > > index 286c88e285ea..89eaab3495a6 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
> > > @@ -467,6 +467,113 @@ static inline u8 vmx_get_rvi(void)
> > >  	return vmcs_read16(GUEST_INTR_STATUS) & 0xff;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +#define __KVM_REQ_VMX_VM_ENTRY_CONTROLS				\
> > > +	(VM_ENTRY_LOAD_DEBUG_CONTROLS)
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> > > +	#define KVM_REQ_VMX_VM_ENTRY_CONTROLS			\
> > > +		(__KVM_REQ_VMX_VM_ENTRY_CONTROLS |		\
> > > +		VM_ENTRY_IA32E_MODE)
> > 
> > This breaks 32-bit builds, but at least we know the assert works!
> > 
> > vmx_set_efer() toggles VM_ENTRY_IA32E_MODE without a CONFIG_X86_64 guard.  That
> > should be easy enough to fix since KVM should never allow EFER_LMA.  Compile 
> > tested patch at the bottom.
> > 
> > More problematic is that clang-13 doesn't like the new asserts, and even worse gives
> > a very cryptic error.  I don't have bandwidth to look into this at the moment, and
> > probably won't next week either.
> > 
> > ERROR: modpost: "__compiletime_assert_533" [arch/x86/kvm/kvm-intel.ko] undefined!
> > ERROR: modpost: "__compiletime_assert_531" [arch/x86/kvm/kvm-intel.ko] undefined!
> > ERROR: modpost: "__compiletime_assert_532" [arch/x86/kvm/kvm-intel.ko] undefined!
> > ERROR: modpost: "__compiletime_assert_530" [arch/x86/kvm/kvm-intel.ko] undefined!
> > make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.modpost:128: modules-only.symvers] Error 1
> > make[1]: *** [Makefile:1753: modules] Error 2
> > make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> 
> clang-14 added support for the error and warning attributes, which makes
> the BUILD_BUG_ON failures look like GCC. With allmodconfig, this
> becomes:

...

> As you mentioned in the other comment on this patch, the 'inline'
> keyword should be '__always_inline' in the BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW macro
> and a couple of other functions need it for BUILD_BUG_ON to see the
> value all the way through the call chain. The following diff resolves
> those errors for me, hopefully it is useful!

Thanks a ton!  Y'all are like a benevolent Beetlejuice, one needs only to mention
"clang" and you show up and solve the problem :-)

> Cheers,
> Nathan
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> index 4ce7ed835e06..b97ed63ece56 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -790,7 +790,7 @@ static bool msr_write_intercepted(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, u32 msr)
>  					 MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL);
>  }
>  
> -static void clear_atomic_switch_msr_special(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx,
> +static __always_inline void clear_atomic_switch_msr_special(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx,
>  		unsigned long entry, unsigned long exit)
>  {
>  	vm_entry_controls_clearbit(vmx, entry);
> @@ -848,7 +848,7 @@ static void clear_atomic_switch_msr(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, unsigned msr)
>  	vmcs_write32(VM_EXIT_MSR_LOAD_COUNT, m->host.nr);
>  }
>  
> -static void add_atomic_switch_msr_special(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx,
> +static __always_inline void add_atomic_switch_msr_special(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx,
>  		unsigned long entry, unsigned long exit,
>  		unsigned long guest_val_vmcs, unsigned long host_val_vmcs,
>  		u64 guest_val, u64 host_val)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
> index 758f80c41beb..acefa5b5e1b9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
> @@ -597,12 +597,12 @@ static inline u##bits lname##_controls_get(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)		\
>  {										\
>  	return __##lname##_controls_get(vmx->loaded_vmcs);			\
>  }										\
> -static inline void lname##_controls_setbit(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, u##bits val)	\
> +static __always_inline void lname##_controls_setbit(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, u##bits val)	\
>  {										\
>  	BUILD_BUG_ON(!(val & (KVM_REQ_VMX_##uname | KVM_OPT_VMX_##uname)));	\
>  	lname##_controls_set(vmx, lname##_controls_get(vmx) | val);		\
>  }										\
> -static inline void lname##_controls_clearbit(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, u##bits val)	\
> +static __always_inline void lname##_controls_clearbit(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, u##bits val)	\
>  {										\
>  	BUILD_BUG_ON(!(val & (KVM_REQ_VMX_##uname | KVM_OPT_VMX_##uname)));	\
>  	lname##_controls_set(vmx, lname##_controls_get(vmx) & ~val);		\
> 
> > > +#else
> > > +	#define KVM_REQ_VMX_VM_ENTRY_CONTROLS			\
> > > +		__KVM_REQ_VMX_VM_ENTRY_CONTROLS
> > > +#endif