From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from desiato.infradead.org (desiato.infradead.org [90.155.92.199])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDE537E
	for <llvm@lists.linux.dev>; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 17:54:09 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:
	References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:
	Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description;
	bh=MXNuYNMsVlTl4n7W8GHGr1bQEFwqfgp2A0ExRIF23qk=; b=qXeNvC+T5gA3BMHrvTz7QklUoi
	zSJhfDsa/e/YFM28wZKpazCPqwXfUaLKWQmqKbkQ6uWUpHc2qXniG48txxPhRSLJg4OWt9sER60tV
	YrBPEmy07SDMpzT2YbwPSY3tcG/1esOvN5peb//b/TwWDUx6nRU3n8//5T3zm6hsnVMs3ZFp6VN6b
	Z6CoE4/2UE9Ehi8mz9zoq9uujaSDUSg0wmdapR/wgQmuzoVOcbgpJId3Z9B8OHpCMEKcnR3IHgQ07
	WA5NdTHPxSFHgeXkh9AG0ojwCik46XFa74EJ3B0q/MkNRS0ceKf38TLFEiNGR6UDUGpw050FKsrpH
	58N98aJg==;
Received: from j130084.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.130.84] helo=worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net)
	by desiato.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux))
	id 1oNeHm-002j9M-Mc; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 17:53:58 +0000
Received: by worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 7DDF0980264; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 19:53:55 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 19:53:55 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>, Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>,
	ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	clang-built-linux <llvm@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: Simplify load_unaligned_zeropad() (was Re: [GIT PULL] Ceph
 updates for 5.20-rc1)
Message-ID: <YvqIMyIDR334j3to@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <CAHk-=wh1xHi-WeytuAK1-iSsR0wi=6e4-WgFq6ZPt8Z1mvqoNA@mail.gmail.com>
 <Yvny9L3tw1EolqQ4@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <CAHk-=whnEN3Apb5gRXSZK7BM+MOby9VCZe3sDcW34Zme_wk3uA@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev
List-Id: <llvm.lists.linux.dev>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:llvm+subscribe@lists.linux.dev>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:llvm+unsubscribe@lists.linux.dev>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=whnEN3Apb5gRXSZK7BM+MOby9VCZe3sDcW34Zme_wk3uA@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 08:58:21AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> The other question I had was actually the "return false" above - I
> decided that if the address of the fault does *not* match the expected
> "round %rdx up" address, we shouldn't do any fixup at all, and treat
> it as a regular kernel oops - as if the exception table hadn't been
> found at all.

Ah yes, I did see that and I agree, that seems like the right thing to do.