From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail.skyhub.de (mail.skyhub.de [5.9.137.197])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99EAB10F0
	for <llvm@lists.linux.dev>; Fri,  2 Sep 2022 05:34:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from nazgul.tnic (dynamic-089-204-154-243.89.204.154.pool.telefonica.de [89.204.154.243])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id AB9A51EC0666;
	Fri,  2 Sep 2022 07:34:36 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim;
	t=1662096877;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:  references:references;
	bh=PY8GamaQGdAxNHbT0Ql8bAobnLY8aY6VMZJwbiIW+s4=;
	b=JlksdLwb0ASeE8eR+yB6tc3C7bN0SvYovWMpLyPVAscvg59Pg0IA7eON8XZWIGo75D8Z5H
	RUPIaDCXdm2EItN0zeaEsaZSwg/P/6YGprJvd9+Sr9ry3EuUAe92z/keCn9U/3420l3wJ2
	33KJshSqGC31XK6n4qdZIMgGHzSzeWc=
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2022 07:34:42 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
	Vincent MAILHOL <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, x86@kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>, Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
	Christophe Jaillet <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>,
	Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] x86/asm/bitops: optimize ff{s,z} functions for
 constant expressions
Message-ID: <YxGV33HTiWQ39Bkp@nazgul.tnic>
References: <20220511160319.1045812-1-mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
 <20220831075742.295-1-mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
 <Yw8hJS9f6SofG4/6@yury-laptop>
 <YxArx4UGoSQXljQd@yury-laptop>
 <CAMZ6Rq+XVWGEEHr9t5dkXN0E36hkpMb5kNEZJmMFgtJxyQntsg@mail.gmail.com>
 <YxC+eShQLDor0B9D@yury-laptop>
 <CAKwvOd=xWEc9T=RQcZDuHNMtng+pODa2SXs9iOmPWdJ5coPBaA@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev
List-Id: <llvm.lists.linux.dev>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:llvm+subscribe@lists.linux.dev>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:llvm+unsubscribe@lists.linux.dev>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAKwvOd=xWEc9T=RQcZDuHNMtng+pODa2SXs9iOmPWdJ5coPBaA@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 10:06:48AM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> Unless Boris feels strong enough to nack the series, I think Yury
> accepting the series is the way to go.

arch/x86/ patches go through the tip tree unless there's a compelling
reason to carry them through another. I don't see one here.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette