From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Tian Lan <tilan7663@gmail.com>
Cc: lkp@intel.com, axboe@kernel.dk, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
tian.lan@twosigma.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] blk-mq: fix blk_mq_hw_ctx active request accounting
Date: Sat, 13 May 2023 22:54:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZF/4/k+u3h2fXgHU@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230513190534.331274-1-tilan7663@gmail.com>
On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 03:05:34PM -0400, Tian Lan wrote:
> From: Tian Lan <tian.lan@twosigma.com>
>
> The nr_active counter continues to increase over time which causes the
> blk_mq_get_tag to hang until the thread is rescheduled to a different
> core despite there are still tags available.
>
> kernel-stack
>
> INFO: task inboundIOReacto:3014879 blocked for more than 2 seconds
> Not tainted 6.1.15-amd64 #1 Debian 6.1.15~debian11
> "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> task:inboundIOReacto state:D stack:0 pid:3014879 ppid:4557 flags:0x00000000
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> __schedule+0x351/0xa20
> scheduler+0x5d/0xe0
> io_schedule+0x42/0x70
> blk_mq_get_tag+0x11a/0x2a0
> ? dequeue_task_stop+0x70/0x70
> __blk_mq_alloc_requests+0x191/0x2e0
>
> kprobe output showing RQF_MQ_INFLIGHT bit is not cleared before
> __blk_mq_free_request being called.
>
> 320 320 kworker/29:1H __blk_mq_free_request rq_flags 0x220c0 in-flight 1
> b'__blk_mq_free_request+0x1 [kernel]'
> b'bt_iter+0x50 [kernel]'
> b'blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter+0x318 [kernel]'
> b'blk_mq_timeout_work+0x7c [kernel]'
> b'process_one_work+0x1c4 [kernel]'
> b'worker_thread+0x4d [kernel]'
> b'kthread+0xe6 [kernel]'
> b'ret_from_fork+0x1f [kernel]'
>
> Signed-off-by: Tian Lan <tian.lan@twosigma.com>
> ---
> block/blk-mq.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index 9c8dc70020bc..732a39d88cd6 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -716,6 +716,10 @@ static void __blk_mq_free_request(struct request *rq)
> blk_crypto_free_request(rq);
> blk_pm_mark_last_busy(rq);
> rq->mq_hctx = NULL;
> +
> + if (rq->rq_flags & RQF_MQ_INFLIGHT)
> + __blk_mq_dec_active_requests(hctx);
> +
> if (rq->tag != BLK_MQ_NO_TAG)
> blk_mq_put_tag(hctx->tags, ctx, rq->tag);
> if (sched_tag != BLK_MQ_NO_TAG)
> @@ -733,9 +737,6 @@ void blk_mq_free_request(struct request *rq)
> q->elevator->type->ops.finish_request)
> q->elevator->type->ops.finish_request(rq);
>
> - if (rq->rq_flags & RQF_MQ_INFLIGHT)
> - __blk_mq_dec_active_requests(hctx);
> -
Unless I am mistaken, hctx is now unused in this function.
> if (unlikely(laptop_mode && !blk_rq_is_passthrough(rq)))
> laptop_io_completion(q->disk->bdi);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-13 20:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20230513141234.8395-1-tilan7663@gmail.com>
2023-05-13 16:41 ` [PATCH 1/1] blk-mq: fix blk_mq_hw_ctx active request accounting kernel test robot
2023-05-13 19:05 ` Tian Lan
2023-05-13 20:54 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2023-05-13 21:15 ` Jens Axboe
2023-05-13 22:11 ` Tian Lan
2023-05-14 1:39 ` Jens Axboe
2023-05-15 12:28 ` Tian Lan
2023-05-13 22:12 ` Tian Lan
2023-05-14 1:52 ` Jens Axboe
2023-05-14 12:20 ` Ming Lei
2023-06-03 22:39 ` [PATCH] " Tian Lan
2023-06-04 0:47 ` Ming Lei
2023-06-03 22:39 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Tian Lan
2023-05-14 14:22 ` Ming Lei
2023-05-14 14:28 ` Tian Lan
2023-05-14 14:53 ` [PATCH] " Tian Lan
2023-05-15 5:54 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-05-15 12:26 ` Tian Lan
2023-05-25 2:12 ` Ming Lei
2023-06-03 23:20 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Jens Axboe
2023-05-14 12:08 ` Ming Lei
2023-05-14 14:12 ` Tian Lan
2023-05-14 14:15 ` Ming Lei
2023-05-13 19:11 ` Tian Lan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZF/4/k+u3h2fXgHU@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tian.lan@twosigma.com \
--cc=tilan7663@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox