From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [arm:for-next 4/4] arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c:324:13: error: static declaration of 'VFP_bounce' follows non-static declaration
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 23:08:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZNql2TqaVFnMKlzJ@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202308150547.m54XHV12-lkp@intel.com>
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 05:06:03AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> tree: git://git.armlinux.org.uk/~rmk/linux-arm.git for-next
> head: f493fedcc3016e46ecbf7ab9490ba4762723efab
> commit: f493fedcc3016e46ecbf7ab9490ba4762723efab [4/4] Merge branch 'devel-stable' into for-next
> config: arm-milbeaut_m10v_defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230815/202308150547.m54XHV12-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: clang version 16.0.4 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git ae42196bc493ffe877a7e3dff8be32035dea4d07)
> reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230815/202308150547.m54XHV12-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202308150547.m54XHV12-lkp@intel.com/
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> >> arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c:324:13: error: static declaration of 'VFP_bounce' follows non-static declaration
> static void VFP_bounce(u32 trigger, u32 fpexc, struct pt_regs *regs)
> ^
> arch/arm/include/asm/vfp.h:105:6: note: previous declaration is here
> void VFP_bounce(u32 trigger, u32 fpexc, struct pt_regs *regs);
> ^
> 1 error generated.
I'm guessing this is a conflict between Arnd's patch
ae1f8d793a19 ("ARM: 9304/1: add prototype for function called only from asm")
merged in v6.5-rc1 and Ard's patch, and that part of Arnd's patch
needs to be reverted since VFP_bounce is now static. Agreed?
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-14 22:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-14 21:06 [arm:for-next 4/4] arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c:324:13: error: static declaration of 'VFP_bounce' follows non-static declaration kernel test robot
2023-08-14 22:08 ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]
2023-08-14 22:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-08-15 8:39 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-08-15 9:05 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-08-15 16:18 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZNql2TqaVFnMKlzJ@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox