From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-next:master 3581/12910] arch/powerpc/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/vfio.c:89:7: error: attribute declaration must precede definition
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 09:12:23 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZOiapxgvLqM1w+DU@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202308251949.5IiaV0sz-lkp@intel.com>
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 07:23:29PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
> head: 6269320850097903b30be8f07a5c61d9f7592393
> commit: c1cce6d079b875396c9a7c6838fc5b024758e540 [3581/12910] vfio: Compile vfio_group infrastructure optionally
> config: powerpc64-randconfig-r001-20230825 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230825/202308251949.5IiaV0sz-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: clang version 16.0.4 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git ae42196bc493ffe877a7e3dff8be32035dea4d07)
> reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230825/202308251949.5IiaV0sz-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202308251949.5IiaV0sz-lkp@intel.com/
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> >> arch/powerpc/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/vfio.c:89:7: error: attribute declaration must precede definition [-Werror,-Wignored-attributes]
> fn = symbol_get(vfio_file_iommu_group);
> ^
> include/linux/module.h:805:60: note: expanded from macro 'symbol_get'
> #define symbol_get(x) ({ extern typeof(x) x __attribute__((weak,visibility("hidden"))); &(x); })
> ^
> include/linux/vfio.h:294:35: note: previous definition is here
> static inline struct iommu_group *vfio_file_iommu_group(struct file *file)
> ^
> >> arch/powerpc/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/vfio.c:89:7: error: attribute declaration must precede definition [-Werror,-Wignored-attributes]
> fn = symbol_get(vfio_file_iommu_group);
> ^
> include/linux/module.h:805:65: note: expanded from macro 'symbol_get'
This VFIO code is fine..
> #define symbol_get(x) ({ extern typeof(x) x __attribute__((weak,visibility("hidden"))); &(x); })
> ^
> include/linux/vfio.h:294:35: note: previous definition is here
> static inline struct iommu_group *vfio_file_iommu_group(struct file *file)
> ^
> 2 errors generated.
Clang is complaining about this line
Which is from:
commit 13150bc5416f45234c955e5bed91623d178c6117
Author: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Date: Tue Oct 27 16:11:32 2020 +0100
module: use hidden visibility for weak symbol references
Geert reports that commit be2881824ae9eb92 ("arm64/build: Assert for
unwanted sections") results in build errors on arm64 for configurations
that have CONFIG_MODULES disabled.
I assume some tweaking there or a clang change is needed
(BTW does clang actually work on power, I tried it a bit ago and it
didn't get very far)
Thanks,
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-25 12:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-25 11:23 [linux-next:master 3581/12910] arch/powerpc/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/vfio.c:89:7: error: attribute declaration must precede definition kernel test robot
2023-08-25 12:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2023-08-25 18:49 ` Nick Desaulniers
2023-08-25 19:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-08-25 20:04 ` Nick Desaulniers
2023-08-30 17:19 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZOiapxgvLqM1w+DU@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=jeyu@kernel.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox