From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org
Cc: nathan@kernel.org, broonie@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: prohibit probing on arch_kunwind_consume_entry()
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 11:24:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZeG63LbuDQaOYLKm@FVFF77S0Q05N> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240229231620.24846-1-puranjay12@gmail.com>
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 11:16:20PM +0000, Puranjay Mohan wrote:
> Make arch_kunwind_consume_entry() as __always_inline otherwise the
> compiler might not inline it and allow attaching probes to it.
>
> Without this, just probing arch_kunwind_consume_entry() via
> <tracefs>/kprobe_events will crash the kernel on arm64.
>
> The crash can be reproduced using the following compiler and kernel
> combination:
> clang version 19.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git d68d29516102252f6bf6dc23fb22cef144ca1cb3)
> commit 87adedeba51a ("Merge tag 'net-6.8-rc7' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net")
>
> [root@localhost ~]# echo 'p arch_kunwind_consume_entry' > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/kprobe_events
> [root@localhost ~]# echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/kprobes/enable
>
> Modules linked in: aes_ce_blk aes_ce_cipher ghash_ce sha2_ce virtio_net sha256_arm64 sha1_ce arm_smccc_trng net_failover failover virtio_mmio uio_pdrv_genirq uio sch_fq_codel dm_mod dax configfs
> CPU: 3 PID: 1405 Comm: bash Not tainted 6.8.0-rc6+ #14
> Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
> pstate: 604003c5 (nZCv DAIF +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
> pc : kprobe_breakpoint_handler+0x17c/0x258
> lr : kprobe_breakpoint_handler+0x17c/0x258
> sp : ffff800085d6ab60
> x29: ffff800085d6ab60 x28: ffff0000066f0040 x27: ffff0000066f0b20
> x26: ffff800081fa7b0c x25: 0000000000000002 x24: ffff00000b29bd18
> x23: ffff00007904c590 x22: ffff800081fa6590 x21: ffff800081fa6588
> x20: ffff00000b29bd18 x19: ffff800085d6ac40 x18: 0000000000000079
> x17: 0000000000000001 x16: ffffffffffffffff x15: 0000000000000004
> x14: ffff80008277a940 x13: 0000000000000003 x12: 0000000000000003
> x11: 00000000fffeffff x10: c0000000fffeffff x9 : aa95616fdf80cc00
> x8 : aa95616fdf80cc00 x7 : 205d343137373231 x6 : ffff800080fb48ec
> x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000001 x3 : 0000000000000000
> x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : ffff800085d6a910 x0 : 0000000000000079
> Call trace:
> kprobes: Failed to recover from reentered kprobes.
> kprobes: Dump kprobe:
> .symbol_name = arch_kunwind_consume_entry, .offset = 0, .addr = arch_kunwind_consume_entry+0x0/0x40
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> kernel BUG at arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c:241!
> kprobes: Failed to recover from reentered kprobes.
> kprobes: Dump kprobe:
> .symbol_name = arch_kunwind_consume_entry, .offset = 0, .addr = arch_kunwind_consume_entry+0x0/0x40
>
> Fixes: 1aba06e7b2b49 ("arm64: stacktrace: factor out kunwind_stack_walk()")
> Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Thanks for this!
Whoops; I had meant to make this __always_inline (or noinstr), but I evidently
messed that up. I don't recall any problem with making this __always_inline,
and that's preferable here to allow the compiler to fold some of the
indirection.
From a scan of stacktrace.c I don't see anything else that needs similar
treatment; the other functions lacking __always_inline and noinstr are safe to
instrument as they aren't core to the unwinder, and won't recurse into
themselves in a problematic way.
Given all the above:
Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Catalin, Will, are you happy to queue this as a fix?
Mark.
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
> index 7f88028a00c0..b2a60e0bcfd2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
> @@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ struct kunwind_consume_entry_data {
> void *cookie;
> };
>
> -static bool
> +static __always_inline bool
> arch_kunwind_consume_entry(const struct kunwind_state *state, void *cookie)
> {
> struct kunwind_consume_entry_data *data = cookie;
>
> base-commit: 87adedeba51a822533649b143232418b9e26d08b
> --
> 2.40.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-01 11:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-29 23:16 [PATCH] arm64: prohibit probing on arch_kunwind_consume_entry() Puranjay Mohan
2024-03-01 11:24 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2024-03-04 13:41 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZeG63LbuDQaOYLKm@FVFF77S0Q05N \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=puranjay12@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox