From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.zeus03.de (www.zeus03.de [194.117.254.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EBE256447 for ; Thu, 7 Mar 2024 08:21:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709799702; cv=none; b=Rz3aFV+v93b4QUrqT19bqjG9h193W5Y9l3Xh5zBk5CoxSGduu89US1UeMLp72xLBLuXYrXC823Ix9/7UC5+LcY0LbazAxl2t0H48B4LjYvSvC/at//5nAUintQic7Y/yTu0FSB0yLNSiFsx4LA7OeCrQHySe+es6QJ+PbPaHh0o= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709799702; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cGrQCcSMkymYB5IZHpWOTvUUbwNUQssV/LLj9ZrMhWY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=G6zLama7+Zr3eRZ/Ysnq6GIsotAFnSBfcsujuDGGxn91of9sFiJ7GrebBZ2Ryl6Wgu1djBhK7ZhvBGlte1ROzBBhur+NdXkIbnXj7NxkxXYTg7j/AeRv3OGre55rTSHcszlZkM42yhCbgMGOy3OJVcnFbapi2NC7uAbp9+aGpks= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b=F3l77BMV; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b="F3l77BMV" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= sang-engineering.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=cGrQ CcSMkymYB5IZHpWOTvUUbwNUQssV/LLj9ZrMhWY=; b=F3l77BMVaU6W2W2/uBza ULPf86P5AdnKm6XSAsTGzlarD7XBpxYMIyMj05Y4lU+qcn17VsAYyDtrBdmzaAC9 uxzEmCfcqzyAyJKrn7rsBaPbDb7QuY5OLtsFQmuT2ikcJbYzCY+NtrFvMIouWuAT xGF2lGjhXcotsKRsgbXONML0J8cuMf6+2lvj2OuOpQtYFwQs9yMKi1UWhrxrpM8g yczcZUVq4CZiTajK69pCq0fJTqqZxs9joUYLJNs/1AJ8J/dkTC/ZI6al5q5azPWB D7FsejeqbYI9BgT0C/4cKXxmcF56TqncPAXq9NP8tkkfj/IKsVBtoDI+uS//ZC45 Ig== Received: (qmail 280653 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2024 09:21:30 +0100 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with ESMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 7 Mar 2024 09:21:30 +0100 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@OAYqww0TjM0gAwDPXwugANQqZcJxr0oT Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 09:21:29 +0100 From: "wsa-dev@sang-engineering.com" To: Hamish Martin Cc: "mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com" , "andi.shyti@kernel.org" , "naresh.kamboju@linaro.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "llvm@lists.linux.dev" , "oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev" , "lkp@intel.com" , "arnd@arndb.de" , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [linux-next:master 11602/11963] ERROR: modpost: "acpi_device_notify_remove" [drivers/i2c/i2c-core.ko] undefined! Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: "wsa-dev@sang-engineering.com" , Hamish Martin , "mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com" , "andi.shyti@kernel.org" , "naresh.kamboju@linaro.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "llvm@lists.linux.dev" , "oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev" , "lkp@intel.com" , "arnd@arndb.de" , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org References: <202403052102.hlG8I44z-lkp@intel.com> <6da20a8cf84d358841068e7eff3323b6d61e014b.camel@alliedtelesis.co.nz> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kvx6EuOu55DTdTQp" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6da20a8cf84d358841068e7eff3323b6d61e014b.camel@alliedtelesis.co.nz> --kvx6EuOu55DTdTQp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline > My recent change introduced a build failure when building as a module. I will revert this change to remove problems in linux-next. It does not make sense to push a fix together with an incremental fix that late in the cycle anyhow. Please resend the updated patch as a whole. I'll try to get it into 6.8. --kvx6EuOu55DTdTQp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmXpeQYACgkQFA3kzBSg KbZQ6A//f/YZHPQeFcSnwDqCMZ60p4rgYtyPSod5ClfwVmteGVKyajFEB/SobRXK E/qU4V0j4UGmYsrqJxM8B9DJVJFXMorYGPDN+B7h8x4YFLCzYGBj7L0tRZGF7589 9ZUnS7qk6PK8XKZMQev/FBJahLzycXqf5jkEkza3Xjbwm9M4ZvbXE6NiiuWMV7xa AxE6yV2iDkgurSL9b5wtJIOR50yLh9moDaHWExYGRshtLMZcLDDAuHHO3bKgEu2W w85vNEymbDMiEpChZjgDjUhxGtm5b1212Gi6/DHDr9FIDq4hU7Eww16yxdDXwXoS n4kocAq9lmgPaASmHS9TWPUbMvjJrM6bUh+ZAYKVuH1agWz5DIWX/k+OgAEr8MlM zpFI0t2QyWEM+RqDWSqlA09xFWvwaQ0L57c6EmnYIK2NXnv4s7MX97JEzcyoah0F +n9/gTgkvjK4psO9gZwc9amnM1RCtcOzr5IkWye0HMDVei+m/GTRDxsbdtghDBBw TTWjB7QxXlVLhHHfTIJvjSXS2G4cQ66T9x4+Pn/TGK8Y1om574ZThqFKRwoAWVkz jFeqlXWiYdsh00k4aRk4bqZ+l1+M8PvjG5WR8xsAQEEByVcDaa1YRVy9v0co/bhp /kklX2OBJg/T6nD1mC/NvkzxL+1JR92KgY5lDR68pci8wzBZj9U= =O/cA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --kvx6EuOu55DTdTQp--