From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1964D187878 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 08:12:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725955950; cv=none; b=SZgNBCOX9FlPKbRzHaaUuhpiOS/xYqdk4XHqj/fnIoEnPJW2UrpeuBvYrzYd99FmTjdFT0jGWzFfik0CiEf3iJMs/rDFNXCxlFyOODczYRH6bRfD0cipK23clt4tIwFHtwWvRYfYzZk3kqu5vpSSodUWWnkY+LOt+H3uUxtYCX0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725955950; c=relaxed/simple; bh=X6w/BPx5GBKrPXBB3CaDS2kMB9yUmJ5UQVZ/g6ar698=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=YegdEfdlTGseyYaKGYen+yqOhudxwpZEf0AXPpreiADeLEypm5QaQRXyAzO23IZUbDAC0Sg25qSYUUXzEhmxuFzpPsIP7XG43q0ro4WsV9HLOdG+lNKbwcnoU4HUGHybec8jvMgjmfOxkHxpqY3/MBsovFtn0Y0idUuY5tK4xD4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=c1JO7NKW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="c1JO7NKW" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1725955949; x=1757491949; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=X6w/BPx5GBKrPXBB3CaDS2kMB9yUmJ5UQVZ/g6ar698=; b=c1JO7NKWOYPt8+q5NLhYkD7Z2AWl3620cVQL8IoL3rRzLUfvlsSEjQw/ /Jxkdp5zhH6HLT1X5OKF+mPF6I4eOptSHNATKeyOy9bUoV7UkBeLyqfQz o9LW3uptwegk5DysrW4UBFfZaJY9mMy3oMHISrHKFtZpUGkWK3og6f6GH fdybnE8oEFX4VIwpDCm3zp2vwgfwuf2mSQkmWV0KcMDp/slqf7xW4uD+m kOxZqZkXOgKHT0NDVmColnXWZhqlhTf0HVcUnyYlK4APM3Xn4+WMilmmT v0mgnZYNUOGZdMe9dhQKg1aZkEQfcxtNGQ36ZM5xequnD76f22UDx0Oxx A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: RBUNpjCzSaK8PArIztYRcw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: s2/HXa8SQxCnZKlSBSimIw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11190"; a="47204530" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,216,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="47204530" Received: from orviesa002.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.142]) by orvoesa101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Sep 2024 01:12:29 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: fyEZI10hQyekJ/4mrj2MmQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 7C9rnatgR5+/KfxNh0wgfg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,216,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="97648069" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by orviesa002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Sep 2024 01:12:25 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from ) id 1snvz3-000000077EJ-2djD; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 11:12:21 +0300 Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 11:12:21 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Simon Horman Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso , Felix Huettner , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev, Jozsef Kadlecsik , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Nathan Chancellor , Nick Desaulniers , Bill Wendling , Justin Stitt Subject: Re: [PATCH net v1 1/1] netfilter: conntrack: Guard possoble unused functions Message-ID: References: <20240905203612.333421-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20240906162938.GH2097826@kernel.org> <20240909151712.GZ2097826@kernel.org> <20240909183043.GE2097826@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240909183043.GE2097826@kernel.org> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 07:30:43PM +0100, Simon Horman wrote: > On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 06:36:07PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 04:17:12PM +0100, Simon Horman wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 12:37:51PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 05:29:38PM +0100, Simon Horman wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 11:36:12PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > > > > > > Local testing seems to show that the warning is still emitted > > > > > for ctnetlink_label_size if CONFIG_NETFILTER_NETLINK_GLUE_CT is enabled > > > > Hold on, this is not related to the patch. > > It might be another issue. > > Yes, sorry, I see that now too. > > Perhaps it can be fixed separately, something like this: If you make a patch, it will help somebody who has that in their configuration files enabled (with the other one being disabled). Note, I use x86_64_defconfig which doesn't have this specific issue to be occurred. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko