From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B1C0208C4 for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2024 15:41:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.14 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731080485; cv=none; b=KhpwY5PeVFxgFrWX41Rec7kXQOTUHgfZzyHXQopJdtnW/qaxnRh94Cu7W3Ueh502JYvFtUpuhnQ191YHNtzvXMJ9+vkIirFtiEKQhLorPHdz8ZexOnbXq/pXbdNSel7bIsvY5Lce1hySSRJEtio6unUhZnVmZIirasx7uIB4+Ts= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731080485; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GRg86Iaef91WkJ0kybWunj6c0WPrPzKuN5k/WFprupo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=pWAoVkJt9CZKJqTSiWvaji66KnRzw3qrZfA+CZr/ze6KMs32MBQ/+zKBHLgEZVxcjx33kdqnSizOsi98MGeI7PEQiK0hYBdyoBgnNk6nVTKeEhRBQUq3Ud0LgM/u5UiYiOp+HIS09zWSs6ropfdlojxRmn353xENT5slaTh6hAU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=SqUkrO1D; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.14 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="SqUkrO1D" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1731080483; x=1762616483; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=GRg86Iaef91WkJ0kybWunj6c0WPrPzKuN5k/WFprupo=; b=SqUkrO1DLvhxPaV43l2BBGSJMJK966pL0vegVPnvgSV0FHa3PfEMRgJm pR3zc1hDEyeTXorSrw29nMi5gWtuPMrAi7B6oJrm33BR3e6vwRI8wGdzj +w+6LOJUPcQR7hYu2KTRsbEfolvNC9e1J/NJErtmJKQhaW1kKflZK/skw iqykkfhiuFYwxChQio5WHX4v833hIrOzjNsRPrmoiSp/T/K/DXqJiXk4Q sG+Dh5qxRDyozKSsY4sBuQPX6itoKwme7sS7S3mYWsHeQBG5WH8sZXDYl HRUq9HvyYEhE7cKcDdYIclLv4FS57mVYGNYlMiNpJTs5krRsg2sBHBzBe Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: moz4SWJqS66GIY6T+4qGdQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: /+mERSXoR8aSqoebGAa91Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11250"; a="31196304" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,138,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="31196304" Received: from fmviesa008.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.148]) by fmvoesa108.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Nov 2024 07:41:23 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: OqrJGXnsRN+X2rJ3BoGNdA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: SioWeqffS/+gVljleFESbw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,138,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="85762889" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.154]) by fmviesa008.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Nov 2024 07:41:20 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from ) id 1t9R6r-0000000Cf8Z-0FPz; Fri, 08 Nov 2024 17:41:17 +0200 Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 17:41:16 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev, Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, Nathan Chancellor , Nick Desaulniers , Bill Wendling , Justin Stitt , Dave Hansen Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] x86/cpu: Make sure flag_is_changeable_p() is always being used Message-ID: References: <20241108153105.1578186-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <732CB428-EE83-455F-A5AF-C008B7541401@zytor.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <732CB428-EE83-455F-A5AF-C008B7541401@zytor.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 04:35:17PM +0100, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On November 8, 2024 4:30:10 PM GMT+01:00, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >See also commit 6863f5643dd7 ("kbuild: allow Clang to find unused static > >inline functions for W=1 build"). ^^^ (1) > Looks good to me: > > Reviewed-by: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) Thank you! > But another question: why the hell does clang complain about an unused static inline function?! Does (1) shed a bit of light to this? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko