From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pandora.armlinux.org.uk (pandora.armlinux.org.uk [78.32.30.218]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A16B4C62E for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2024 14:20:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=78.32.30.218 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731507617; cv=none; b=p7+VOlplo7SZT7cHtg8wcz49sOKNoXcAt+r9fAXCeQgSBLMNMN0G/cdYO/u9p0ZLfs0RJPBO/WmhIOLKy/MXDC7zTXzuWjXj/7kePuUth2KPES1lSDMO4XqpYGrIMQO7WdlofHFiD9XF8YAgGBrohMKvZlFr8Zhh1DySFs2djjU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731507617; c=relaxed/simple; bh=P17KMoRtkJg6aHvEyApGXy0PV005D3bHiugmndAKsZ0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=rA3KK0eKgE02UA/OTcdNnu3dsDKFpWDGgnDrFD114HpHFjYRWsrk+gGaftFZxJw5sdoX2jBbDiGIxOUT1k0S19h7Y+zuzNEM3t8lB344rgeSSAzbGqJiG3phCPB9p2MXD48Sm8mx9Rm9uXnxaOgKYXNe7mAPZHHXQSss9x3lXzo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=armlinux.org.uk; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=armlinux.org.uk; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=armlinux.org.uk header.i=@armlinux.org.uk header.b=im73hmVV; arc=none smtp.client-ip=78.32.30.218 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=armlinux.org.uk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=armlinux.org.uk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=armlinux.org.uk header.i=@armlinux.org.uk header.b="im73hmVV" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armlinux.org.uk; s=pandora-2019; h=Sender:In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=SlB5MYusK8b1mv7/1MZmVvegYIaryfpg+zAbobQyH78=; b=im73hmVVpi6xpLao3e5pgmuxUK XZ6r0bFi2obo11fIc0c9c7wZh2EPJ+Lq/303PvQaydRbs02kSaAb46tnbBqmAGTcvaZTYrxNjvmmC ee493QwASJG+9BtQ29OtMyaVnCP82RBwhZ5TSU0+DV4MpiKdUZcjAuDtH7eajSNDOGgM0NUdxqr5o 8rgsz/0/wEo5LWLoaiG2J5IE1A4hHGnqIgPS5ysFf3Ftl5BuVEwBoc3FEUINvmye3K7jDzfQHluGT wHa8Uiwp+OpjonVWAX9IMTaIt3d5vitS5bPhpSkvl+zVo/dtjZ+HEpSnN1jco1+XKw9FC1ps77wEZ Ors8NdYg==; Received: from shell.armlinux.org.uk ([fd8f:7570:feb6:1:5054:ff:fe00:4ec]:43462) by pandora.armlinux.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1tBEE2-0006Mu-1i; Wed, 13 Nov 2024 14:20:07 +0000 Received: from linux by shell.armlinux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1tBEDy-00006E-10; Wed, 13 Nov 2024 14:20:02 +0000 Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 14:20:02 +0000 From: "Russell King (Oracle)" To: Linus Walleij Cc: kernel test robot , Melon Liu , llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [rmk:for-next 3/7] arch/arm/mm/ioremap.c:130:32: error: call to undeclared function 'kasan_mem_to_shadow'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations Message-ID: References: <202411130711.xfVEiMKn-lkp@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Sender: Russell King (Oracle) On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 01:34:34AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 12:11 AM kernel test robot wrote: > > > >> arch/arm/mm/ioremap.c:130:32: error: call to undeclared function 'kasan_mem_to_shadow'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > > 130 | sync_pgds(mm, (unsigned long)kasan_mem_to_shadow( > > | ^ > > 1 warning and 1 error generated. > > I mentioned this in a comment to 9429/1 that it supercedes 9427/1 since the > author didn't send a new version to solve this issue. Maybe I should have > mailed some more... Sorry, missed that comment. > 9429/1, 9430/1 and 9431/1 can be applied cleanly in its place. I initially applied all of them, deciding that 9427/1 was a fix and the other three were development. On merging the two branches, the conflicts looked horrible, so I dropped the "development" stuff rather than the apparent "fix" patch, clearly I should've looked closer and done the opposite. Now corrected, assuming tonight's build is clean, no further action should be required. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!