Building the Linux kernel with Clang and LLVM
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
To: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>,
	Valentin Obst <kernel@valentinobst.de>,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/mqueue: fix 5 warnings about signed/unsigned mismatches
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 08:54:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a340524c-15c1-4b8e-b7a9-1fad52e97f69@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240505221359.65258-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com>

On 05/05/2024 23:13, John Hubbard wrote:
> When building with clang, via:
> 
>     make LLVM=1 -C tools/testing/selftest
> 
> ...clang warns about several cases of using a signed integer for the
> priority argument to mq_receive(3), which expects an unsigned int.
> 
> Fix this by declaring the type as unsigned int in all cases.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/mqueue/mq_perf_tests.c | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mqueue/mq_perf_tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mqueue/mq_perf_tests.c
> index 5c16159d0bcd..fb898850867c 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mqueue/mq_perf_tests.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mqueue/mq_perf_tests.c
> @@ -323,7 +323,8 @@ void *fake_cont_thread(void *arg)
>  void *cont_thread(void *arg)
>  {
>  	char buff[MSG_SIZE];
> -	int i, priority;
> +	int i;
> +	unsigned int priority;
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < num_cpus_to_pin; i++)
>  		if (cpu_threads[i] == pthread_self())
> @@ -425,7 +426,8 @@ struct test test2[] = {
>  void *perf_test_thread(void *arg)
>  {
>  	char buff[MSG_SIZE];
> -	int prio_out, prio_in;
> +	int prio_out;

It feels a bit odd for prio_out and prio_in to have different types. I don't
have any prior familiararity with these tests but looks like they are ultimately
the parameters of mq_send() and mq_receive() which both define them as unsigned
ints. Perhaps both should be converted?

> +	unsigned int prio_in;
>  	int i;
>  	clockid_t clock;
>  	pthread_t *t;
> 
> base-commit: f462ae0edd3703edd6f22fe41d336369c38b884b
> prerequisite-patch-id: b901ece2a5b78503e2fb5480f20e304d36a0ea27


  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-07  7:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-05 22:13 [PATCH] selftests/mqueue: fix 5 warnings about signed/unsigned mismatches John Hubbard
2024-05-07  7:54 ` Ryan Roberts [this message]
2024-05-07 17:04   ` John Hubbard
2024-05-08  9:14     ` Ryan Roberts

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a340524c-15c1-4b8e-b7a9-1fad52e97f69@arm.com \
    --to=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kernel@valentinobst.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=sj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox