From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
"David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)" <david@kernel.org>,
llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Subject: Re: [akpm-mm:mm-unstable 36/283] mm/hugetlb.c:4753:18: warning: implicit conversion from 'unsigned long long' to 'unsigned long' changes value from 17179869184 to 0
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 18:54:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aRd69_c1pULRoKOU@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251114182956.GD2566209@ax162>
On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 11:29:56AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > >> mm/util.c:1263:16: warning: implicit conversion from 'unsigned long long' to 'unsigned long' changes value from 17179869184 to 0 [-Wconstant-conversion]
> > 1263 | if (ps->idx < MAX_FOLIO_NR_PAGES) {
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > include/linux/mm.h:2104:36: note: expanded from macro 'MAX_FOLIO_NR_PAGES'
> > 2104 | #define MAX_FOLIO_NR_PAGES (1UL << MAX_FOLIO_ORDER)
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > include/linux/mm.h:2095:36: note: expanded from macro 'MAX_FOLIO_ORDER'
> > 2095 | #define MAX_FOLIO_ORDER get_order(SZ_16G)
> > | ~~~~~~~~~ ^~~~~~
> > include/linux/sizes.h:56:19: note: expanded from macro 'SZ_16G'
> > 56 | #define SZ_16G _AC(0x400000000, ULL)
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Clearly this is a 32-bit build, since otherwise a conversion from
"unsigned long long" to "unsigned long" is a NOP. But 32-bit cannot
support 16GB folios!
I say this is a bug in powerpc32's config.
#if !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE)
#define MAX_FOLIO_ORDER MAX_PAGE_ORDER
...
#else
#define MAX_FOLIO_ORDER PUD_ORDER
(PUD_ORDER is 16GB, so I think this will be what's being picked up)
but the only place the mentions ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE is pretty
clearly dependent on 64bit ...
config PPC_RADIX_MMU
bool "Radix MMU Support"
depends on PPC_BOOK3S_64
select ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE
so I'm a bit stuck about how this comes to be. Adding the PPC people
for thoughts.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-14 18:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-14 6:46 [akpm-mm:mm-unstable 36/283] mm/hugetlb.c:4753:18: warning: implicit conversion from 'unsigned long long' to 'unsigned long' changes value from 17179869184 to 0 kernel test robot
2025-11-14 18:29 ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-11-14 18:54 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2025-11-14 19:18 ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-11-14 19:39 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aRd69_c1pULRoKOU@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).