public inbox for llvm@lists.linux.dev
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Philip Li <philip.li@intel.com>
To: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@kernel.org>
Cc: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org>,
	Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@intel.com>,
	kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>, <llvm@lists.linux.dev>,
	<oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev>, Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-next:master 4752/13171] error[E0609]: no field `__bindgen_anon_1` on type `bindings::kernel_param`
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 08:51:21 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aTIsiXMzcmBXBKRV@rli9-mobl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f2320396-4509-4591-983c-6eb96db85663@kernel.org>

On Thu, Dec 04, 2025 at 12:59:02PM +0100, Daniel Gomez wrote:
> > While we could see from the config that you were using bindgen 0.72.0,
> > it was not clear to us where you get this bindgen from. Obtaining
> > bindgen does not seem to be part of the reproducer instructions (or
> > maybe I am not looking in the right place?).
> > 
> > If I understand correctly, this issue manifested only when building
> > bindgen 0.72.0 with clang-22-git. Building this was next on our list in
> > trying to reproduce, but getting to that conclusion took a while.
> > 
> > Anyway, I want to ask if you can include directions for obtaining or
> > building bindgen in your reproducer instructions?
> 
> + Any reason to use an unreleased clang version for this reports? Since clang-22
> is not officially released yet, issues seen with it seem lower priority than
> those reproduced with stable, released versions. Does it make sense to act
> on these kind of "bleeding edge" reports, or should we wait until they're
> confirmed on a stable release? Does 0day test both?

Hi Andreas, currently the bot will test multiple versions of clang including released
ones like clang-20/clang-21, plus the latest clang from its repo.

We do have some patterns to send reports of low confidence to llvm@lists only or to
have manual check before sending out, probably we can also add some guard when rust
issue is reported on unreleased clang?

> 
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > Andreas Hindborg
> > 
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-12-05  0:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-01 20:20 [linux-next:master 4752/13171] error[E0609]: no field `__bindgen_anon_1` on type `bindings::kernel_param` kernel test robot
2025-12-02 21:02 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-12-04  5:57   ` Oliver Sang
2025-12-04 11:47     ` Andreas Hindborg
2025-12-04 11:59       ` Daniel Gomez
2025-12-04 12:24         ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-12-05  0:58           ` Philip Li
2025-12-05 10:43             ` Andreas Hindborg
2025-12-05 11:14               ` Philip Li
2025-12-05  0:51         ` Philip Li [this message]
2025-12-05  2:19       ` Oliver Sang
2025-12-05  2:22         ` Philip Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aTIsiXMzcmBXBKRV@rli9-mobl \
    --to=philip.li@intel.com \
    --cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
    --cc=da.gomez@kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=lossin@kernel.org \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox