From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 473FD2E6CAA; Tue, 3 Feb 2026 14:58:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.19 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770130711; cv=none; b=JSGzmiAQXgOsYjjRzkuuTT0z38mZlM4cf7ApdL2oLPW60RMC1yB7bQTalNbK/R5jw/RYjOa8SDbNJRDyfc30T2Iiwqb13eS5Ly47WVtxjifUDedeyG+7E0G9e4T97+C53thB6xNGqRcvRMdyA7aUkZnbgUCMIBGq61fZOvw6Gp8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770130711; c=relaxed/simple; bh=3OqK9oTeVR5lGSXtaWyFd41ZMpY3Io7T1BufEaZUCaQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=l7gm5hdIln2CPNfqXBWVyroN+VdKXqjFgSAHpCA9JkdK2STD75TdidMPERPsKwv4IU6QpwDJrSFXtMvCQzWfHDW2GLF4Xj/WSehmpXCOP5ulZTbaWpvuwfLG8yZjam+x5LoAvYg3ixAfYz9NoAUNNeCfFbwal6sRwKXZ1/cZVto= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=K7Hn9MCV; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.19 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="K7Hn9MCV" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1770130710; x=1801666710; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=3OqK9oTeVR5lGSXtaWyFd41ZMpY3Io7T1BufEaZUCaQ=; b=K7Hn9MCViXijX0fol+g7gtaMz13pGFswsk6woNyAyqzh4sl3bSK8H0PZ 47SDJH73xge9tf5jKlqdo0oB8CCgbe+0rWuDZDFYr9kxoXzM3v+quLXBE sT2pmLcLuKvuFqvElrPKXtlQsFvk5/0b1/5H6v/RiHHAJN6cZtsbzG4Bc 0we6DL2SuhjB0Nfz7sfBROVlRZtd941v1rUEXAHgZcAaRRXfxemWH5+B9 z6uedy5b0RVi7t2yRXng8GvPHr8Cm3KllosbEqgrV2zcm5Cet3tcL3BJO Fbmk7SBxFbFDkzoTZtbJOTXjgSVTcyXMTAMnF5ibpyhi+0/orOyFXkQwi w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: imTcosciSV2yEuWgaflQOQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: MOIEsOD2SAWE1KSGKOFJsg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11690"; a="70319512" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,270,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="70319512" Received: from orviesa008.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.148]) by fmvoesa113.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Feb 2026 06:58:16 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: TEiuhvuxRciWAcrGKGfvVQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: pMj6s6SHTVauTS8hT+TbVg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,270,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="209901413" Received: from pgcooper-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.245.99]) by orviesa008-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Feb 2026 06:58:10 -0800 Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2026 16:58:08 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: kernel test robot Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Steven Rostedt , Masami Hiramatsu , Simon Horman , Jeff Layton , Anna Schumaker , Chuck Lever , llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Arnd Bergmann , Mathieu Desnoyers , Andrew Morton , Linux Memory Management List , Randy Dunlap , Yury Norov , Joel Fernandes , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: remove __printf() attribute on __ftrace_vbprintk() Message-ID: References: <20260202095834.1328352-1-arnd@kernel.org> <202602032036.FQK7gJvV-lkp@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <202602032036.FQK7gJvV-lkp@intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Tue, Feb 03, 2026 at 08:12:57PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: Yeah, you need to go for the full stack of these calls and mark the bottom one with __diag() to avoid these warnings. That's my understanding and what BPF people required. Chasing this one-by-one would produce unneeded churn. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko