From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Tengda Wu <wutengda@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
leo.yan@linux.dev, Li Huafei <lihuafei1@huawei.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Zecheng Li <zli94@ncsu.edu>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/16] perf capstone: Fix arm64 jump/adrp disassembly mismatch with objdump
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2026 23:43:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <adSnjABSDeeg-9O8@z2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260403094800.1418825-3-wutengda@huaweicloud.com>
On Fri, Apr 03, 2026 at 09:47:46AM +0000, Tengda Wu wrote:
> The jump and adrp instructions parsed by libcapstone currently lack
> symbolic representation and use a '#' prefix for addresses. This
> format is inconsistent with objdump's output, which causes subsequent
> parsing in jump__parse() and arm64_mov__parse() to fail.
>
> Example mismatch:
> Current: b #0xffff8000800114c8
> Fix: b ffff8000800114c8 <el0t_64_sync+0x108>
>
> Current: adrp x18, #0xffff800081f5f000
> Fix: adrp x18, ffff800081f5f000 <this_cpu_vector>
>
> Fix this by implementing extended formatting for these arm64
> instructions during symbol__disassemble_capstone(). This ensures
> the output matches objdump's expected style, including the raw
> address and the associated <symbol+offset> suffix.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tengda Wu <wutengda@huaweicloud.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/capstone.c | 107 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> tools/perf/util/disasm.c | 5 ++
> tools/perf/util/disasm.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/capstone.c b/tools/perf/util/capstone.c
> index 25cf6e15ec27..1d8421d2d98c 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/capstone.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/capstone.c
> @@ -255,10 +255,6 @@ static void print_capstone_detail(struct cs_insn *insn, char *buf, size_t len,
> struct map *map = args->ms->map;
> struct symbol *sym;
>
> - /* TODO: support more architectures */
> - if (!arch__is_x86(args->arch))
> - return;
> -
> if (insn->detail == NULL)
> return;
>
> @@ -305,6 +301,98 @@ static void print_capstone_detail(struct cs_insn *insn, char *buf, size_t len,
> }
> }
>
> +static void format_capstone_insn_x86(struct cs_insn *insn, char *buf,
> + size_t len, struct annotate_args *args,
> + u64 addr)
> +{
> + int printed;
> +
> + printed = scnprintf(buf, len, " %-7s %s",
> + insn->mnemonic, insn->op_str);
> + buf += printed;
> + len -= printed;
> +
> + print_capstone_detail(insn, buf, len, args, addr);
> +}
> +
> +static void format_capstone_insn_arm64(struct cs_insn *insn, char *buf,
> + size_t len, struct annotate_args *args,
> + u64 addr)
> +{
> + struct map *map = args->ms->map;
> + struct symbol *sym;
> + char *last_imm, *endptr;
> + u64 orig_addr;
> +
> + scnprintf(buf, len, " %-7s %s",
> + insn->mnemonic, insn->op_str);
> + /*
> + * Adjust instructions to keep the existing behavior with objdump.
> + *
> + * Example conversion:
> + * From: b #0xffff8000800114c8
> + * To: b ffff8000800114c8 <el0t_64_sync+0x108>
> + */
> + switch (insn->id) {
> + case ARM64_INS_B:
> + case ARM64_INS_BL:
> + case ARM64_INS_CBNZ:
> + case ARM64_INS_CBZ:
> + case ARM64_INS_TBNZ:
> + case ARM64_INS_TBZ:
> + case ARM64_INS_ADRP:
> + /* Extract last immediate value as address */
> + last_imm = strrchr(buf, '#');
> + if (!last_imm)
> + return;
> +
> + orig_addr = strtoull(last_imm + 1, &endptr, 16);
> + if (endptr == last_imm + 1)
> + return;
> +
> + /* Relocate map that contains the address */
> + if (dso__kernel(map__dso(map))) {
> + map = maps__find(map__kmaps(map), orig_addr);
> + if (map == NULL)
> + return;
I know you copied the logic from x86, but I've realized that it leaks a
refcount for the new kernel map returned from maps__find(). This needs
to be fixed separately.
Thanks,
Namhyung
> + }
> +
> + /* Convert it to map-relative address for search */
> + addr = map__map_ip(map, orig_addr);
> +
> + sym = map__find_symbol(map, addr);
> + if (sym == NULL)
> + return;
> +
> + /* Symbolize the resolved address */
> + len = len - (last_imm - buf);
> + if (addr == sym->start) {
> + scnprintf(last_imm, len, "%"PRIx64" <%s>",
> + orig_addr, sym->name);
> + } else {
> + scnprintf(last_imm, len, "%"PRIx64" <%s+%#"PRIx64">",
> + orig_addr, sym->name, addr - sym->start);
> + }
> + break;
> + default:
> + break;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void format_capstone_insn(struct cs_insn *insn, char *buf, size_t len,
> + struct annotate_args *args, u64 addr)
> +{
> + /* TODO: support more architectures */
> + if (arch__is_x86(args->arch))
> + format_capstone_insn_x86(insn, buf, len, args, addr);
> + else if (arch__is_arm64(args->arch))
> + format_capstone_insn_arm64(insn, buf, len, args, addr);
> + else {
> + scnprintf(buf, len, " %-7s %s",
> + insn->mnemonic, insn->op_str);
> + }
> +}
> +
> struct find_file_offset_data {
> u64 ip;
> u64 offset;
> @@ -381,14 +469,9 @@ int symbol__disassemble_capstone(const char *filename __maybe_unused,
>
> free_count = count = perf_cs_disasm(handle, buf, buf_len, start, buf_len, &insn);
> for (i = 0, offset = 0; i < count; i++) {
> - int printed;
> -
> - printed = scnprintf(disasm_buf, sizeof(disasm_buf),
> - " %-7s %s",
> - insn[i].mnemonic, insn[i].op_str);
> - print_capstone_detail(&insn[i], disasm_buf + printed,
> - sizeof(disasm_buf) - printed, args,
> - start + offset);
> + format_capstone_insn(&insn[i], disasm_buf,
> + sizeof(disasm_buf), args,
> + start + offset);
>
> args->offset = offset;
> args->line = disasm_buf;
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/disasm.c b/tools/perf/util/disasm.c
> index 40fcaed5d0b1..988b2b748e11 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/disasm.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/disasm.c
> @@ -202,6 +202,11 @@ bool arch__is_powerpc(const struct arch *arch)
> return arch->id.e_machine == EM_PPC || arch->id.e_machine == EM_PPC64;
> }
>
> +bool arch__is_arm64(const struct arch *arch)
> +{
> + return arch->id.e_machine == EM_AARCH64;
> +}
> +
> static void ins_ops__delete(struct ins_operands *ops)
> {
> if (ops == NULL)
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/disasm.h b/tools/perf/util/disasm.h
> index a6e478caf61a..d3730ed86dba 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/disasm.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/disasm.h
> @@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ struct annotate_args {
> const struct arch *arch__find(uint16_t e_machine, uint32_t e_flags, const char *cpuid);
> bool arch__is_x86(const struct arch *arch);
> bool arch__is_powerpc(const struct arch *arch);
> +bool arch__is_arm64(const struct arch *arch);
>
> extern const struct ins_ops call_ops;
> extern const struct ins_ops dec_ops;
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-07 6:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-03 9:47 [PATCH v2 00/16] perf arm64: Support data type profiling Tengda Wu
2026-04-03 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 01/16] perf llvm: Fix arm64 adrp instruction disassembly mismatch with objdump Tengda Wu
2026-04-03 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 02/16] perf capstone: Fix arm64 jump/adrp " Tengda Wu
2026-04-07 6:43 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2026-04-03 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 03/16] perf annotate-arm64: Generalize arm64_mov__parse to support standard operands Tengda Wu
2026-04-07 6:58 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-04-03 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 04/16] perf annotate-arm64: Handle load and store instructions Tengda Wu
2026-04-07 7:09 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-04-03 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 05/16] perf annotate: Introduce extract_op_location callback for arch-specific parsing Tengda Wu
2026-04-03 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 06/16] perf dwarf-regs: Adapt get_dwarf_regnum() for arm64 Tengda Wu
2026-04-03 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 07/16] perf annotate-arm64: Implement extract_op_location() callback Tengda Wu
2026-04-07 7:26 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-04-03 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 08/16] perf annotate-arm64: Enable instruction tracking support Tengda Wu
2026-04-03 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 09/16] perf annotate-arm64: Support load instruction tracking Tengda Wu
2026-04-03 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 10/16] perf annotate-arm64: Support store " Tengda Wu
2026-04-03 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 11/16] perf annotate-arm64: Support stack variable tracking Tengda Wu
2026-04-03 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 12/16] perf annotate-arm64: Support 'mov' instruction tracking Tengda Wu
2026-04-03 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 13/16] perf annotate-arm64: Support 'add' " Tengda Wu
2026-04-03 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 14/16] perf annotate-arm64: Support 'adrp' instruction to track global variables Tengda Wu
2026-04-03 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 15/16] perf annotate-arm64: Support per-cpu variable access tracking Tengda Wu
2026-04-03 9:48 ` [PATCH v2 16/16] perf annotate-arm64: Support 'mrs' instruction to track 'current' pointer Tengda Wu
2026-04-07 6:31 ` [PATCH v2 00/16] perf arm64: Support data type profiling Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=adSnjABSDeeg-9O8@z2 \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=kim.phillips@arm.com \
--cc=leo.yan@linux.dev \
--cc=lihuafei1@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=wutengda@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=zli94@ncsu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox