From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "Dan Carpenter" <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
"Naresh Kamboju" <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
"Uladzislau Rezki" <urezki@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-next <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux Regressions" <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
clang-built-linux <llvm@lists.linux.dev>,
lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: mm/vmalloc.c:4691:25: error: variable 'addr' is uninitialized when used here [-Werror,-Wuninitialized]
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 17:37:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bb175a67-462b-41a7-804a-ec990291a00e@app.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <908325ed-08af-4b0c-926e-da9afba25772@app.fastmail.com>
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024, at 13:55, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2024, at 12:16, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 04:23:09PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>>> Following build failures noticed on i386 and x86 with clang builds on the
>>> Linux next-20240111 tag.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
>>>
>>> Build error:
>>> ----------
>>> mm/vmalloc.c:4691:25: error: variable 'addr' is uninitialized when
>>> used here [-Werror,-Wuninitialized]
>>> 4691 | va = __find_vmap_area(addr, &vn->busy.root);
>>> | ^~~~
>>> mm/vmalloc.c:4684:20: note: initialize the variable 'addr' to silence
>>> this warning
>>> 4684 | unsigned long addr;
>>> | ^
>>> | = 0
>>> 1 error generated.
>>
>> We turned off uninitialized variable warnings for GCC a long time ago...
>> :/ I don't know if we'll be able to re-enable it in a -Werror world
>> although Clang seems to be managing alright so perhaps there is hope.
>
> The problem with gcc's warning is that it is non-deterministic and
> in recent versions actually got more false-positives even without
> -Os or -fsanitize=. Clang does not catch all that gcc does because
> it doesn't track state across inline functions, but at least its
> output is always the same regardless of optimization and other
> options.
>
> At least this particular one is an obvious bug and easily gets
> caught by lkft and lkp even if gcc's -Wuninitilized doesn't
> flag it.
As it turns out, gcc did find this one in the default -Wuninitialized
regardless of -Wmaybe-uninitialized:
mm/vmalloc.c: In function 'vmalloc_dump_obj':
mm/vmalloc.c:4691:22: error: 'addr' is used uninitialized [-Werror=uninitialized]
4691 | va = __find_vmap_area(addr, &vn->busy.root);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
mm/vmalloc.c:4684:23: note: 'addr' was declared here
4684 | unsigned long addr;
| ^~~~
and I see that Uladzislau Rezki already sent a fix, which
is the same that I tried out in my randconfig tree:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZaARXdbigD1hWuOS@pc638.lan/
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-11 16:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-11 10:53 mm/vmalloc.c:4691:25: error: variable 'addr' is uninitialized when used here [-Werror,-Wuninitialized] Naresh Kamboju
2024-01-11 11:16 ` Dan Carpenter
2024-01-11 12:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-01-11 16:37 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2024-01-12 2:46 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bb175a67-462b-41a7-804a-ec990291a00e@app.fastmail.com \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox