Re: [PATCH v1] slab: support for compiler-assisted type-based slab cache partitioning

["Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" <vbabka@kernel.org>]

On 4/3/26 08:27, Harry Yoo (Oracle) wrote:
>> diff --git a/include/linux/slab.h b/include/linux/slab.h
>> index 15a60b501b95..c0bf00ee6025 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/slab.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/slab.h
>> @@ -864,10 +877,10 @@ unsigned int kmem_cache_sheaf_size(struct slab_sheaf *sheaf);
>>   * with the exception of kunit tests
>>   */
>>  
>> -void *__kmalloc_noprof(size_t size, gfp_t flags)
>> +void *__kmalloc_noprof(size_t size, gfp_t flags, kmalloc_token_t token)
>>  				__assume_kmalloc_alignment __alloc_size(1);
>>  
>> -void *__kmalloc_node_noprof(DECL_BUCKET_PARAMS(size, b), gfp_t flags, int node)
>> +void *__kmalloc_node_noprof(DECL_BUCKET_PARAMS(size, b), gfp_t flags, int node, kmalloc_token_t token)
>>  				__assume_kmalloc_alignment __alloc_size(1);
> 
> So the @token parameter is unused when CONFIG_PARTITION_KMALLOC_CACHES is
> disabled but still increases the kernel size by a few kilobytes...
> but yeah I'm not sure if we can get avoid it without hurting readability.
> 
> Just saying. (does anybody care?)

Well we did care enough with CONFIG_SLAB_BUCKETS to hide the unused param
using DECL_BUCKET_PARAMS(), so maybe extend that idea?
I think it's not just kernel size, but increased register pressure etc.