From: Tengda Wu <wutengda@huaweicloud.com>
To: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
james.clark@linaro.org, Li Huafei <lihuafei1@huawei.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
leo.yan@linux.dev, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Zecheng Li <zli94@ncsu.edu>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 19/23] perf annotate-arm64: Support 'mov' instruction tracking
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 16:59:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d53b15a6-e735-45fc-b9cd-4815b7484f6f@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <960b490f-42da-4a9e-8734-62f9c3773b2d@linux.alibaba.com>
On 2026/8/11 16:37, Shuai Xue wrote:
>
>
> On 8/8/26 8:23 PM, Tengda Wu wrote:
>> Extend update_insn_state() for arm64 to support register-to-register and
>> immediate-to-register 'mov' instructions.
>>
>> For register-to-register 'mov' (e.g., mov dreg, sreg), propagate data type
>> information from the source register to the destination register.
>>
>> For immediate-to-register 'mov' (e.g., mov dreg, #imm), store the immediate
>> value in the destination register's imm_value field and set its kind to
>> TSR_KIND_CONST, allowing subsequent instructions to resolve it as a
>> constant.
>>
>> A real-world example is shown below:
>>
>> ffff8000803eebf8 <get_vma_policy>:
>> ffff8000803eec20: mov x21, x0 // x0 (struct vm_area_struct*) -> x21
>> ffff8000803eec28: ldr x2, [x0, #112]
>> ffff8000803eec2c: cbz x2, ffff8000803eec94 <get_vma_policy+0x9c>
>> * ffff8000803eec94: ldr x0, [x21, #152]
>>
>> Before this commit, the type of x21 was unknown, causing the subsequent
>> inference to fail:
>>
>> var [0] reg0 offset 0 type='struct vm_area_struct*' size=0x8
>> chk [9c] reg21 offset=0x98 ok=0 kind=0 cfa : no type information
>> final result: no type information
>>
>> After this commit, the type of x21 is correctly inferred as 'vm_area_struct':
>>
>> var [0] reg0 offset 0 type='struct vm_area_struct*' size=0x8
>> mov [28] reg0 -> reg21 type='struct vm_area_struct*' size=0x8
>> chk [9c] reg21 offset=0x98 ok=1 kind=1 (struct vm_area_struct*) : Good!
>> found by insn track: 0x98(reg21) type-offset=0x98
>> final result: type='struct vm_area_struct' size=0xb0
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tengda Wu <wutengda@huaweicloud.com>
>> ---
>> .../perf/util/annotate-arch/annotate-arm64.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate-arch/annotate-arm64.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate-arch/annotate-arm64.c
>> index 6e09e9707256..7b780bad8c07 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate-arch/annotate-arm64.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate-arch/annotate-arm64.c
>> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
>> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> #include <linux/compiler.h>
>> #include <errno.h>
>> +#include <inttypes.h>
>> #include <stdlib.h>
>> #include <string.h>
>> #include <linux/ctype.h>
>> @@ -484,6 +485,7 @@ static int propagate_load_reg_state(struct type_state *state,
>> tsr->type = type_die;
>> tsr->kind = TSR_KIND_TYPE;
>> tsr->offset = 0;
>> + tsr->imm_value = 0;
>> tsr->ok = true;
>> if (src->multi_regs) {
>> @@ -641,6 +643,51 @@ static void update_store_insn_state(struct type_state *state,
>> adjust_reg_index_state(state, dst, insn_name, dl->al.offset);
>> }
>> +static void update_mov_insn_state(struct type_state *state,
>> + struct disasm_line *dl,
>> + struct annotated_op_loc *src,
>> + struct annotated_op_loc *dst)
>> +{
>> + struct type_state_reg *tsr;
>> + u32 insn_offset = dl->al.offset;
>> + int sreg = src->reg1;
>> + int dreg = dst->reg1;
>> +
>> + if (!has_reg_type(state, dreg))
>> + return;
>> +
>> + tsr = &state->regs[dreg];
>> + tsr->copied_from = -1;
>> +
>> + if (src->imm) {
>> + tsr->kind = TSR_KIND_CONST;
>> + tsr->imm_value = src->offset;
>> + tsr->offset = 0;
>> + tsr->ok = true;
>
> This overwrites only part of the register state: if the destination
> previously held a variable with an active DWARF lifetime, the stale
> lifetime_active/lifetime_end survive, and the call-invalidation
> exemption then protects a plain constant across calls. Same gap as
> the return-type block discussed earlier - clearing the register state
> (invalidate_reg_state()) before filling it in would cover both.
>
Agreed.
>
>> +
>> + pr_debug_dtp("mov [%x] imm=%#"PRIx64" -> reg%d\n",
>> + insn_offset, tsr->imm_value, dreg);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!has_reg_type(state, sreg) || !state->regs[sreg].ok) {
>> + invalidate_reg_state(tsr);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + tsr->type = state->regs[sreg].type;
>> + tsr->kind = state->regs[sreg].kind;
>> + tsr->imm_value = state->regs[sreg].imm_value;
>> + tsr->offset = state->regs[sreg].offset;
>> + tsr->ok = state->regs[sreg].ok;
>
> onversely, the register-to-register path drops the lifetime fields
> that the x86 handler explicitly copies. Not copying is arguably more
> correct - the DWARF location range describes the variable living in
> the source register - but it also means a value moved into a
> callee-saved register gets invalidated by the first call, losing the
> tracking. Is the omission intentional? If so, a comment would help;
> either way the two archs should probably converge on one behaviour.
>
The lifetime field is only meaningful within the context of the DWARF
information it was parsed from, and it specifically describes the source
register itself. Therefore, it __cannot__ be blindly copied over to the
destination register. Here is an example to illustrate this:
find data type for 0(reg19) at flush_ptrace_hw_breakpoint+0x28
CU for arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c (die:0x1026b9)
frame base: cfa=1 fbreg=31
scope: [1/1] (die:125362) [function] flush_ptrace_hw_breakpoint
bb: [0 - 28]
var [0] reg0 offset 0 type='struct task_struct*' size=0x8 (die:0x1042d6)
mov [18] reg0 -> reg20 type='struct task_struct*' size=0x8 (die:0x1042d6)
0x001253a6: DW_TAG_variable
DW_AT_name ("t")
DW_AT_decl_file ("debian/build/build_arm64_none_arm64/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c")
DW_AT_decl_line (209)
DW_AT_decl_column (24)
DW_AT_type (0x001253d3 "thread_struct *")
DW_AT_location (0x000237ff:
[0xffff80008001c9b0, 0xffff80008001c9d0): DW_OP_breg0 W0+3024, DW_OP_stack_value
ffff80008001c9a8 <flush_ptrace_hw_breakpoint>:
ffff80008001c9a8: d503201f nop
ffff80008001c9ac: d503201f nop
ffff80008001c9b0: d503233f paciasp // lifetime_active
ffff80008001c9b4: a9bd7bfd stp x29, x30, [sp, #-48]!
ffff80008001c9b8: 910003fd mov x29, sp
ffff80008001c9bc: a90153f3 stp x19, x20, [sp, #16]
ffff80008001c9c0: aa0003f4 mov x20, x0
ffff80008001c9c4: 913ae013 add x19, x0, #0xeb8
ffff80008001c9c8: f90013f5 str x21, [sp, #32]
ffff80008001c9cc: 913ce015 add x21, x0, #0xf38
ffff80008001c9d0: f9400260 ldr x0, [x19] // lifetime_end
ffff80008001c9d4: b4000060 cbz x0, ffff80008001c9e0 <flush_ptrace_hw_breakpoint+0x38>
ffff80008001c9d8: 940bbd6c bl ffff80008030bf88 <unregister_hw_breakpoint>
// x0's lifetime expires here and becomes invalid, but x20 is callee-saved
// and should NOT be invalidated
...
ffff80008001c9ec: 913ee294 add x20, x20, #0xfb8
I agree with your point. I will add a comment here to explain the rationale.
>> +
>> + if (tsr->kind == TSR_KIND_TYPE || tsr->kind == TSR_KIND_POINTER)
>> + tsr->copied_from = sreg;
>> +
>> + pr_debug_dtp("mov [%x] reg%d -> reg%d", insn_offset, sreg, dreg);
>> + pr_debug_type_name(&tsr->type, tsr->kind);
>> +}
>> +
>> static void update_insn_state_arm64(struct type_state *state,
>> struct data_loc_info *dloc, Dwarf_Die *cu_die,
>> struct disasm_line *dl)
>> @@ -703,6 +750,7 @@ static void update_insn_state_arm64(struct type_state *state,
>> * prevent stale type info from propagating to subsequent instructions.
>> */
>> if (has_reg_type(state, dst->reg1) &&
>> + strcmp(dl->ins.name, "mov") &&
>> strncmp(dl->ins.name, "ld", 2) && strncmp(dl->ins.name, "st", 2)) {
>
> Comparison and test instructions get killed by this: for cmp x5, x6
> the first operand ends up as the target (reg1 = x5), and since cmp
> matches none of the exemptions above, a read-only register is
> invalidated. Same for cmn and tst, and for the tested register of
> cbz/cbnz/tbz/tbnz. Since comparisons sit between the tracked load and
> the sampled access in almost every hot path, this silently drops a
> lot of type resolution.
>
> The x86 side avoids this by using a whitelist of instructions that
> actually clobber pointer registers; here an exemption for the
> read-only compares/tests would do:
>
> if (has_reg_type(state, dst->reg1) && !dst->mem_ref &&
> strcmp(dl->ins.name, "mov") && strcmp(dl->ins.name, "cmp") &&
> strcmp(dl->ins.name, "cmn") && strcmp(dl->ins.name, "tst") &&
> ...)
>
Yes, I missed these instructions. I will add them.
Thanks,
Tengda
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-18 8:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-08 12:23 [PATCH v4 00/23] perf arm64: Support data type profiling Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 01/23] perf capstone: Fix arm64 jump/adrp disassembly mismatch with objdump Tengda Wu
2026-08-10 13:08 ` Shuai Xue
2026-08-11 2:27 ` Tengda Wu
2026-08-11 3:25 ` Shuai Xue
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 02/23] perf llvm: Fix arm64 adrp instruction " Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 03/23] perf annotate-arm64: Generalize arm64_mov__parse to support more instructions Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 04/23] perf annotate-arm64: Handle load and store instructions Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 05/23] perf dwarf-regs: Adapt get_dwarf_regnum() for arm64 Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 06/23] perf annotate: Adapt arch__dwarf_regnum() " Tengda Wu
2026-08-11 6:33 ` Shuai Xue
2026-08-11 8:16 ` Tengda Wu
2026-08-24 21:39 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 07/23] perf annotate: Introduce extract_op_location callback for arch-specific parsing Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 08/23] perf annotate-arm64: Implement extract_op_location() callback Tengda Wu
2026-08-11 6:50 ` Shuai Xue
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 09/23] perf annotate: Deduplicate overlapping ARM SPE events for data type profiling Tengda Wu
2026-08-10 6:57 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-12 2:28 ` Tengda Wu
2026-08-12 6:07 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-12 8:53 ` Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 10/23] perf arm-spe: Set default synthesized event period to 1 Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 11/23] perf annotate-data: Extract invalidate_reg_state() as a common helper Tengda Wu
2026-08-11 7:09 ` Shuai Xue
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 12/23] perf annotate-arm64: Enable instruction tracking support Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 13/23] perf annotate-arm64: Track return type after call instructions Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 14/23] perf annotate-arm64: Support load instruction tracking Tengda Wu
2026-08-11 7:36 ` Shuai Xue
2026-08-13 14:54 ` Tengda Wu
2026-08-24 21:44 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 15/23] perf annotate-arm64: Support store " Tengda Wu
2026-08-11 8:00 ` Shuai Xue
2026-08-14 1:26 ` Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 16/23] perf annotate-data: Expand type_state_reg imm_value to u64 Tengda Wu
2026-08-11 8:10 ` Shuai Xue
2026-08-14 7:58 ` Tengda Wu
2026-08-24 21:48 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 17/23] perf annotate-data: Track imm_value for stack variables Tengda Wu
2026-08-11 8:16 ` Shuai Xue
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 18/23] perf annotate-arm64: Support stack variable tracking Tengda Wu
2026-08-11 8:24 ` Shuai Xue
2026-08-14 11:44 ` Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 19/23] perf annotate-arm64: Support 'mov' instruction tracking Tengda Wu
2026-08-11 8:37 ` Shuai Xue
2026-08-18 8:59 ` Tengda Wu [this message]
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 20/23] perf annotate-arm64: Support 'add' " Tengda Wu
2026-08-11 8:45 ` Shuai Xue
2026-08-19 3:04 ` Tengda Wu
2026-08-24 21:58 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-08-28 7:41 ` Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 21/23] perf annotate-arm64: Support 'adrp' instruction to track global variables Tengda Wu
2026-08-11 8:50 ` Shuai Xue
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 22/23] perf annotate-arm64: Support per-cpu variable access tracking Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 12:24 ` [PATCH v4 23/23] perf annotate-arm64: Support 'mrs' instruction to track 'current' pointer Tengda Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d53b15a6-e735-45fc-b9cd-4815b7484f6f@huaweicloud.com \
--to=wutengda@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=kim.phillips@arm.com \
--cc=leo.yan@linux.dev \
--cc=lihuafei1@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=zli94@ncsu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox