public inbox for llvm@lists.linux.dev
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	Ilie Halip <ilie.halip@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Mete Durlu <meted@linux.ibm.com>,
	Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
	Ulrich Weigand <Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390/test_unwind: use raw opcode instead of invalid instruction
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 10:39:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d9ec2704-f41c-eafa-1945-ce845d65be8a@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKwvOd=9tsHHhPBOx2ORZoJP09VsX5dRZn58qj3MzCc2vmVosg@mail.gmail.com>



Am 19.11.21 um 02:10 schrieb Nick Desaulniers:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 9:48 AM Ilie Halip <ilie.halip@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Building with clang & LLVM_IAS=1 leads to an error:
>>      arch/s390/lib/test_unwind.c:179:4: error: invalid register pair
>>                          "       mvcl    %%r1,%%r1\n"
>>                          ^
>>
>> The test creates an invalid instruction that would trap at runtime, but the
>> LLVM inline assembler tries to validate it at compile time too.
>>
>> Use the raw instruction opcode instead.
>>
>> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1421
>> Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Ilie Halip <ilie.halip@gmail.com>
> 
> Ilie, thanks for the patch!
> 
> So if I understand
> https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs/as/s390-Directives.html#s390-Directives
> https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs/as/s390-Formats.html
> that `e,` prefix is for 16B opcodes?

e is an instruction format as specified by the architecture.
See http://publibfp.dhe.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/a227832c.pdf
without any parameters.
Normally RR would be the right thing for MVCL, but since
we try to build an invalid opcode without the assembler
noticing (ab)using e seem like a safer approach.

> 
> LGTM, thanks again.
> Suggested-by: Ulrich Weigand <Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>

added those and added my RB. applied to the s390 tree. Thanks


> 
> I triple checked that GAS, clang, and GNU objdump are in agreement in
> terms of encoding here.
> 
>> ---
>>   arch/s390/lib/test_unwind.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/lib/test_unwind.c b/arch/s390/lib/test_unwind.c
>> index cfc5f5557c06..d342bc884b94 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/lib/test_unwind.c
>> +++ b/arch/s390/lib/test_unwind.c
>> @@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ static noinline int unwindme_func4(struct unwindme *u)
>>                   * trigger specification exception
>>                   */
>>                  asm volatile(
>> -                       "       mvcl    %%r1,%%r1\n"
>> +                       "       .insn e,0x0e11\n"       /* mvcl %%r1,%%r1" */
>>                          "0:     nopr    %%r7\n"
>>                          EX_TABLE(0b, 0b)
>>                          :);
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-19  9:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-17 17:48 [PATCH] s390/test_unwind: use raw opcode instead of invalid instruction Ilie Halip
2021-11-19  1:10 ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-11-19  9:39   ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2021-11-19  9:44     ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-11-19 10:54     ` Heiko Carstens
2021-11-19 10:57       ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-11-19 11:09         ` Heiko Carstens
2021-11-19 14:12           ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-11-19 15:15             ` Heiko Carstens

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d9ec2704-f41c-eafa-1945-ce845d65be8a@de.ibm.com \
    --to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ilie.halip@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=meted@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox