From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pf1-f170.google.com (mail-pf1-f170.google.com [209.85.210.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFC1B1779B4; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 17:28:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.170 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712770117; cv=none; b=PN9dTUoqbP377uYjcXU8hXKmrODjeDJi4jK1cgFBmlfICL3HhCxMkXQMerjgXze78RXKk+gCxdM8HNMoUkD6ubI6UpIjC3OR5wjIIKxV3rKkdpNlX/9BoKZSwbWHysfLu0x0Ihcur3J+z3guBh5GeCugKP4icIJbmeGKSVpZ9hA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712770117; c=relaxed/simple; bh=f3Xt/dZfBXBIQcYbl1nJPSnlAT4JgWHq8FYToJaQzHw=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=kuJE48+lehAu8XxLjUSwNPTEpaVG3gPP7r1F11oBoU1AQpP93/Gz6dmyKIJBQJXpsI+m76AJXjH/GkWXZkSOJAQNPrWZ1KV8RqruSljutMBitW2AIExUh5uaqGhv0fjQ1sQlnv/9KD8XkCIScOq82Tab+qCJFuvm5xrpKnm0LL8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=CgLN9dn+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.170 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="CgLN9dn+" Received: by mail-pf1-f170.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-6ed112c64beso3495927b3a.1; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 10:28:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1712770115; x=1713374915; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:autocrypt:from :content-language:references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Zq4d+AiOVD5bmBrgseTVTs7156g17/GtSiUjyHq5BcM=; b=CgLN9dn+wwpPVmW6vNiBsEiehBvl1JvRB826uhksCzDoFfsdNOIhWX8H8fJxrX9HC+ NyyFWT0HGVcF1iJU4jNyHGjPPW77AvWhfnMJIXTdTT0unhEg//beEwpzIMRciEreWS6k Cfa+qoL+YghpJWhxu7U6L4q8mw+5Hh4Fr0/LpHRPYHjsUsyzv5CLRd36loRInkK30Xfo a6FA8otCTnRqLANuSGzV2B6ZwznAPYmyAqRQvWbrFf/xqn83VSaDw6KYUYKR1uEZRh4k 3U8zikj4XoeKJ4O09/2jiXuy7uTE+ZTETA4oO6UTliihP3QgFy5mRVStZ1fAf8JfnJiT SFhQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712770115; x=1713374915; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:autocrypt:from :content-language:references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=Zq4d+AiOVD5bmBrgseTVTs7156g17/GtSiUjyHq5BcM=; b=gT3S9C2nJB49nA/YooEwu1iSZPVztMOA/sm1O+/HAb7S2fk56iRpxUwhKiZC4ch+A0 uEC9uK7LIj9UGDA64+N8blHWSmeTKXJ1jNc8NrX7FdwspQRteA4NTSAnm0oaJ1ZwdCdT AoFYn6Wj/TfvyF6LCyd0oPGtMtRAiuPkfVDjBmfC8JowvpHdwl7Ujz6BUhRxRsW8iOOv ewNc67bvCBx9XyXPNYN9Nr99dCsEE9B1xgeK8fj94pQ4I6pz/BDr+v+ZnCgxDFImpurC RHklZ0rqQ/hTcR4gKjpqXUIqWZgQW1mLOJhSQNVAUtsT73QCTwz7uQigT1k54C2Lvy+q mW0g== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCW3CMz3noyonw2dRW6LrWwl0lyp1QTD6hrL+8X1TUIrqPlcPxbyQlKldN+qp8kz143aj3bMwjgg3apVoOasmM3OJzXloWSB5Qxd2jwtqMSVYkml4p+5amznYO0luKaMEHhl0bo= X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzdz7bhiYcNbBBHEcc7gZKYgjINK1+jpB+1us4GdpmMcFbLi8Ex UCjG7oQ9UyCXDGapBuW9oD9qaWZmgBHK9g935bfWhiF59cKQeZd6 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGIHil3mApRP9h1oyA+lEyfdCYJsOMLxEB1v3XLb5vQtFzdv6rWoHVqJv60PpJI2f5a5ZjGEg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:803:b0:6eb:40:6bff with SMTP id m3-20020a056a00080300b006eb00406bffmr3877766pfk.14.1712770114852; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 10:28:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.230.29.214] ([192.19.223.252]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f21-20020a63dc55000000b005ce472f2d0fsm10064336pgj.66.2024.04.10.10.28.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 10 Apr 2024 10:28:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 10:28:31 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [net-next:main 26/50] net/ipv4/tcp.c:4673:2: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_1030' declared with 'error' attribute: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: offsetof(struct tcp_sock, __cacheline_group_end__tcp_sock_write_txrx) - offsetofend(struct tcp_sock, __cacheline_group_begin__tcp_sock_... To: Eric Dumazet , Vladimir Oltean , Jakub Kicinski Cc: kernel test robot , llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org References: <202404082207.HCEdQhUO-lkp@intel.com> <20240408230632.5ml3amaztr5soyfs@skbuf> Content-Language: en-US From: Florian Fainelli Autocrypt: addr=f.fainelli@gmail.com; keydata= xsDiBEjPuBIRBACW9MxSJU9fvEOCTnRNqG/13rAGsj+vJqontvoDSNxRgmafP8d3nesnqPyR xGlkaOSDuu09rxuW+69Y2f1TzjFuGpBk4ysWOR85O2Nx8AJ6fYGCoeTbovrNlGT1M9obSFGQ X3IzRnWoqlfudjTO5TKoqkbOgpYqIo5n1QbEjCCwCwCg3DOH/4ug2AUUlcIT9/l3pGvoRJ0E AICDzi3l7pmC5IWn2n1mvP5247urtHFs/uusE827DDj3K8Upn2vYiOFMBhGsxAk6YKV6IP0d ZdWX6fqkJJlu9cSDvWtO1hXeHIfQIE/xcqvlRH783KrihLcsmnBqOiS6rJDO2x1eAgC8meAX SAgsrBhcgGl2Rl5gh/jkeA5ykwbxA/9u1eEuL70Qzt5APJmqVXR+kWvrqdBVPoUNy/tQ8mYc nzJJ63ng3tHhnwHXZOu8hL4nqwlYHRa9eeglXYhBqja4ZvIvCEqSmEukfivk+DlIgVoOAJbh qIWgvr3SIEuR6ayY3f5j0f2ejUMYlYYnKdiHXFlF9uXm1ELrb0YX4GMHz80nRmxvcmlhbiBG YWluZWxsaSA8Zi5mYWluZWxsaUBnbWFpbC5jb20+wmYEExECACYCGyMGCwkIBwMCBBUCCAME FgIDAQIeAQIXgAUCVF/S8QUJHlwd3wAKCRBhV5kVtWN2DvCVAJ4u4/bPF4P3jxb4qEY8I2gS 6hG0gACffNWlqJ2T4wSSn+3o7CCZNd7SLSDOw00ESM+4EhAQAL/o09boR9D3Vk1Tt7+gpYr3 WQ6hgYVON905q2ndEoA2J0dQxJNRw3snabHDDzQBAcqOvdi7YidfBVdKi0wxHhSuRBfuOppu pdXkb7zxuPQuSveCLqqZWRQ+Cc2QgF7SBqgznbe6Ngout5qXY5Dcagk9LqFNGhJQzUGHAsIs hap1f0B1PoUyUNeEInV98D8Xd/edM3mhO9nRpUXRK9Bvt4iEZUXGuVtZLT52nK6Wv2EZ1TiT OiqZlf1P+vxYLBx9eKmabPdm3yjalhY8yr1S1vL0gSA/C6W1o/TowdieF1rWN/MYHlkpyj9c Rpc281gAO0AP3V1G00YzBEdYyi0gaJbCEQnq8Vz1vDXFxHzyhgGz7umBsVKmYwZgA8DrrB0M oaP35wuGR3RJcaG30AnJpEDkBYHznI2apxdcuTPOHZyEilIRrBGzDwGtAhldzlBoBwE3Z3MY 31TOpACu1ZpNOMysZ6xiE35pWkwc0KYm4hJA5GFfmWSN6DniimW3pmdDIiw4Ifcx8b3mFrRO BbDIW13E51j9RjbO/nAaK9ndZ5LRO1B/8Fwat7bLzmsCiEXOJY7NNpIEpkoNoEUfCcZwmLrU +eOTPzaF6drw6ayewEi5yzPg3TAT6FV3oBsNg3xlwU0gPK3v6gYPX5w9+ovPZ1/qqNfOrbsE FRuiSVsZQ5s3AAMFD/9XjlnnVDh9GX/r/6hjmr4U9tEsM+VQXaVXqZuHKaSmojOLUCP/YVQo 7IiYaNssCS4FCPe4yrL4FJJfJAsbeyDykMN7wAnBcOkbZ9BPJPNCbqU6dowLOiy8AuTYQ48m vIyQ4Ijnb6GTrtxIUDQeOBNuQC/gyyx3nbL/lVlHbxr4tb6YkhkO6shjXhQh7nQb33FjGO4P WU11Nr9i/qoV8QCo12MQEo244RRA6VMud06y/E449rWZFSTwGqb0FS0seTcYNvxt8PB2izX+ HZA8SL54j479ubxhfuoTu5nXdtFYFj5Lj5x34LKPx7MpgAmj0H7SDhpFWF2FzcC1bjiW9mjW HaKaX23Awt97AqQZXegbfkJwX2Y53ufq8Np3e1542lh3/mpiGSilCsaTahEGrHK+lIusl6mz Joil+u3k01ofvJMK0ZdzGUZ/aPMZ16LofjFA+MNxWrZFrkYmiGdv+LG45zSlZyIvzSiG2lKy kuVag+IijCIom78P9jRtB1q1Q5lwZp2TLAJlz92DmFwBg1hyFzwDADjZ2nrDxKUiybXIgZp9 aU2d++ptEGCVJOfEW4qpWCCLPbOT7XBr+g/4H3qWbs3j/cDDq7LuVYIe+wchy/iXEJaQVeTC y5arMQorqTFWlEOgRA8OP47L9knl9i4xuR0euV6DChDrguup2aJVU8JPBBgRAgAPAhsMBQJU X9LxBQkeXB3fAAoJEGFXmRW1Y3YOj4UAn3nrFLPZekMeqX5aD/aq/dsbXSfyAKC45Go0YyxV HGuUuzv+GKZ6nsysJw== In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 4/8/2024 10:08 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 1:06 AM Vladimir Oltean wrote: >> >> Hi Eric, >> >> On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 10:49:35PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: >>>>> net/ipv4/tcp.c:4673:2: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_1030' declared with 'error' attribute: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: offsetof(struct tcp_sock, __cacheline_group_end__tcp_sock_write_txrx) - offsetofend(struct tcp_sock, __cacheline_group_begin__tcp_sock_write_txrx) > 92 >>>> 4673 CACHELINE_ASSERT_GROUP_SIZE(struct tcp_sock, tcp_sock_write_txrx, 92); >> >> I can confirm the same compile time assertion with an armv7 gcc 7.3.1 compiler. >> If I revert commit 86dad9aebd0d ("Revert "tcp: more struct tcp_sock adjustments") >> it goes away. >> >> Before the change (actually with it reverted), I can see that the >> tcp_sock_write_txrx cacheline group begins at offset 1821 with a 3 byte >> hole, and ends at offset 1897 (it has 76 bytes). > > > ... > >> It gained 20 bytes in the change. Most notably, it gained a 4 byte hole >> between pred_flags and tcp_clock_cache. >> >> I haven't followed the development of these optimizations, and I tried a >> few trivial things, some of which didn't work, and some of which did. >> Of those that worked, the most notable one was letting the 2 u64 fields, >> tcp_clock_cache and tcp_mstamp, be the first members of the group, and >> moving the __be32 pred_flags right below them. >> >> Obviously my level of confidence in the fix is quite low, so it would be >> great if you could cast an expert eye onto this. > > I am on it, do not worry, thanks ! Also just got hit by this on an ARMv7 build configuration as well. Jakub, I do not see a 32-bit build in the various checks being run for a patch, could you add one, if nothing else a i386 build and a multi_v7_defconfig build would get us a good build coverage. Thanks! -- Florian