From: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
To: 'kernel test robot' <lkp@intel.com>,
"'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
'Linus Torvalds' <torvalds@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "llvm@lists.linux.dev" <llvm@lists.linux.dev>,
"oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev" <oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev>,
"'Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)'" <willy@infradead.org>,
'Christoph Hellwig' <hch@infradead.org>,
'Andrew Morton' <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Linux Memory Management List" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
'Andy Shevchenko' <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
'Dan Carpenter' <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
'Arnd Bergmann' <arnd@kernel.org>,
"'Jason@zx2c4.com'" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
"'pedro.falcato@gmail.com'" <pedro.falcato@gmail.com>,
'Mateusz Guzik' <mjguzik@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 4/7] minmax: Simplify signedness check
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 16:39:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f3b69fcd666e498da74c12f332c3a2a0@AcuMS.aculab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202407252100.fDFchC5O-lkp@intel.com>
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Sent: 25 July 2024 14:24
>
> Hi David,
>
> kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
>
> [auto build test ERROR on linux/master]
> [also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.10 next-20240725]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
>
> url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/David-Laight/minmax-Put-all-the-clamp-
> definitions-together/20240724-224832
> base: linux/master
> patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/03601661326c4efba4e618ead15fa0e2%40AcuMS.aculab.com
> patch subject: [PATCH 4/7] minmax: Simplify signedness check
> config: mips-loongson1b_defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-
> ci/archive/20240725/202407252100.fDFchC5O-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: clang version 15.0.7 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project
> 8dfdcc7b7bf66834a761bd8de445840ef68e4d1a)
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-
> ci/archive/20240725/202407252100.fDFchC5O-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202407252100.fDFchC5O-lkp@intel.com/
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
...
> b286d8b1a690667 Herbert Xu 2016-11-22 75
> b286d8b1a690667 Herbert Xu 2016-11-22 76 /* Get a spot of the specified length that does not straddle a page.
> b286d8b1a690667 Herbert Xu 2016-11-22 77 * The caller needs to ensure that there is enough space for this operation.
> b286d8b1a690667 Herbert Xu 2016-11-22 78 */
> b286d8b1a690667 Herbert Xu 2016-11-22 79 static inline u8 *skcipher_get_spot(u8 *start, unsigned int len)
> b286d8b1a690667 Herbert Xu 2016-11-22 80 {
> b286d8b1a690667 Herbert Xu 2016-11-22 81 u8 *end_page = (u8 *)(((unsigned long)(start + len - 1)) & PAGE_MASK);
> b286d8b1a690667 Herbert Xu 2016-11-22 82
> b286d8b1a690667 Herbert Xu 2016-11-22 @83 return max(start, end_page);
> b286d8b1a690667 Herbert Xu 2016-11-22 84 }
> b286d8b1a690667 Herbert Xu 2016-11-22 85
I thought this version supported that :-(
Certainly I've hit and fixed this before.
Using min/max() on pointers just makes it all more horrid.
The problem is that is_signed_type() isn't 'constant enough' for pointers.
Supporting pointers may require yet another (bloating) _is_constexpr() call.
Or add a simpler min_ptr() that includes a 'pointer' check.
But this might only be reported by clang with W=1.
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-25 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <03601661326c4efba4e618ead15fa0e2@AcuMS.aculab.com>
2024-07-25 13:24 ` [PATCH 4/7] minmax: Simplify signedness check kernel test robot
2024-07-25 16:39 ` David Laight [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f3b69fcd666e498da74c12f332c3a2a0@AcuMS.aculab.com \
--to=david.laight@aculab.com \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mjguzik@gmail.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pedro.falcato@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox