From: Marc Titinger <mtitinger@baylibre.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>, jdelvare@suse.com
Cc: lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bcousson@baylibre.com, mturquette@baylibre.com
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2] hwmon: ina2xx: allow for actual measurement bandwidth above 160 Hz
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 13:17:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56263EED.7020902@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56263973.300@roeck-us.net>
On 20/10/2015 14:54, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 10/20/2015 01:20 AM, Marc Titinger wrote:
>> With the current implementation, the driver will prevent a readout at a
>> pace faster than the default conversion time (2ms) times the averaging
>> setting, min AVG being 1:1.
>>
>> Any sysfs "show" read access from the client app faster than 500 Hz
>> will be
>> 'cached' by the driver, but actually since do_update reads all 8
>> registers,
>> the best achievable measurement rate is roughly 8*800 us (for the time
>> spent in i2c-core) i.e. <= 156Hz with Beagle Bone Black.
>>
>> This change set uses a register mask to allow for the readout of a single
>> i2c register at a time. Furthermore, performing subsequent reads on the
>> same register will make use of the ability of the i2c chip to retain the
>> last reg offset, hence use a shorter i2c message (roughly 400us
>> instead of
>> 800us spent in i2c-core.c).
>>
> That doesn't work. There could be accesses from other sources (such as
> through
> i2c-dev, or in multi-master systems) between two reads.
Re-setting the register address with each read transaction will not
prevent another master to change the configuration in your back, in this
case. That sounds like a general issue of concurrent clients for one
device, this is beyond just reading one register IMO.
>
>> The best readout rate for a single measurement is now around 2kHz. And
>> for
>> four measurements around (1/(4*800us) = 312 Hz. Since for any readout
>> rate
>> faster than 160 Hz the interval is set by the i2c transactions
>> completion,
>> the 'last-update' anti-flooding code will not have a limiting effect in
>> practice. Hence I also remove the elapsed time checking in the hwmon
>> driver
>> for ina2xx.
>>
>> To summarize, the patch provides a max bandwidth improvement with hwmon
>> client apps from ~160 Hz to ~320 Hz, and better in single-channel
>> polling mode.
>>
> Overall your patch pretty much re-implements regmap. Since you drop
> caching,
> it is also unnecessary to read all registers at a time, so you can just use
> a function to read _one_ register and returns its value (with retries).
> Or use regmap. Either case, do_update() and ina2xx_update_device() are no
> longer needed.
Agreed.
>
> If you want to convert the driver to regmap, just look for 'regmap' in
> drivers/hwmon for examples.
Fair enough, but based on your comments, I may look into an iio driver
instead for this device, given our application, rather than 'twisting'
the hwmon interface.
Cheers,
Marc.
>
> Guenter
>
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-20 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-19 16:21 [lm-sensors] [RFC] hwmon: ina2xx: allow for actual measurement bandwidth above 160 Hz Marc Titinger
2015-10-20 1:32 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-10-20 7:58 ` Marc Titinger
2015-10-20 8:20 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2] " Marc Titinger
2015-10-20 12:54 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-10-20 13:17 ` Marc Titinger [this message]
2015-10-20 13:30 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-10-20 13:46 ` Marc Titinger
2015-10-20 17:00 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-10-21 7:46 ` Marc Titinger
2015-10-20 13:52 ` Michael Turquette
2015-10-23 16:13 ` [lm-sensors] [RFC] hwmon: ina2xx: port to using remap, improve bandwidth Marc Titinger
2015-10-23 16:49 ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-23 16:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-10-23 20:35 ` Marc Titinger
2015-10-24 2:21 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-10-24 12:45 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-10-26 16:24 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 0/2] hwmon: ina2xx: convert driver to using regmap Marc Titinger
2015-10-26 16:24 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 1/2] " Marc Titinger
2015-10-27 1:02 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-10-27 1:12 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-10-27 9:51 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2 " Marc Titinger
2015-10-27 9:51 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2 2/2] hwmon: ina2xx: give precedence to DT over checking for platform data Marc Titinger
2015-10-28 2:47 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2 1/2] hwmon: ina2xx: convert driver to using regmap Guenter Roeck
2015-10-28 9:23 ` Marc Titinger
2015-10-26 16:24 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 2/2] hwmon: ina2xx: give precedence to DT over checking for platform data Marc Titinger
2015-10-27 1:10 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-10-23 16:55 ` [lm-sensors] [RFC] hwmon: ina2xx: port to using remap, improve bandwidth kbuild test robot
2015-10-23 20:10 ` kbuild test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56263EED.7020902@baylibre.com \
--to=mtitinger@baylibre.com \
--cc=bcousson@baylibre.com \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox