* [lm-sensors] ncpXXxh103 compensation values?
@ 2016-03-30 14:03 Maxime Jayat
2016-03-30 15:09 ` Joseph McNally
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Jayat @ 2016-03-30 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joseph McNally; +Cc: Jean Delvare, Guenter Roeck, lm-sensors, linux-kernel
Hello Joseph,
You recently added support for the ncpXXxh103 in
drivers/hwmon/ntc_thermistor.c with the following array of values:
+static const struct ntc_compensation ncpXXxh103[] = {
+ { .temp_c = -40, .ohm = 247565 },
+ { .temp_c = -35, .ohm = 181742 },
+ { .temp_c = -30, .ohm = 135128 },
+ { .temp_c = -25, .ohm = 101678 },
+ { .temp_c = -20, .ohm = 77373 },
+ { .temp_c = -15, .ohm = 59504 },
+ { .temp_c = -10, .ohm = 46222 },
+ { .temp_c = -5, .ohm = 36244 },
+ { .temp_c = 0, .ohm = 28674 },
+ { .temp_c = 5, .ohm = 22878 },
+ { .temp_c = 10, .ohm = 18399 },
+ { .temp_c = 15, .ohm = 14910 },
+ { .temp_c = 20, .ohm = 12169 },
+ { .temp_c = 25, .ohm = 10000 },
+ { .temp_c = 30, .ohm = 8271 },
+ { .temp_c = 35, .ohm = 6883 },
+ { .temp_c = 40, .ohm = 5762 },
+ { .temp_c = 45, .ohm = 4851 },
+ { .temp_c = 50, .ohm = 4105 },
+ { .temp_c = 55, .ohm = 3492 },
+ { .temp_c = 60, .ohm = 2985 },
+ { .temp_c = 65, .ohm = 2563 },
+ { .temp_c = 70, .ohm = 2211 },
+ { .temp_c = 75, .ohm = 1915 },
+ { .temp_c = 80, .ohm = 1666 },
+ { .temp_c = 85, .ohm = 1454 },
+ { .temp_c = 90, .ohm = 1275 },
+ { .temp_c = 95, .ohm = 1121 },
+ { .temp_c = 100, .ohm = 990 },
+ { .temp_c = 105, .ohm = 876 },
+ { .temp_c = 110, .ohm = 779 },
+ { .temp_c = 115, .ohm = 694 },
+ { .temp_c = 120, .ohm = 620 },
+ { .temp_c = 125, .ohm = 556 },
+};
+
Where are these taken from?
Unlike the other thermistors in the file, these values don't seem to
match anything in the Murata NTC Thermistor Datasheet.
See:
http://www.murata.com/~/media/webrenewal/support/library/catalog/products/thermistor/ntc/r44e.ashx
--
Maxime Jayat
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [lm-sensors] ncpXXxh103 compensation values?
2016-03-30 14:03 [lm-sensors] ncpXXxh103 compensation values? Maxime Jayat
@ 2016-03-30 15:09 ` Joseph McNally
2016-03-30 15:58 ` Maxime Jayat
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Joseph McNally @ 2016-03-30 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
Hello Maxime,
This data was calculated for a Murata NCP15XH103XXXXX.
You have illustrated something to me with your question though. When I
uploaded this patch, I was following the format of the compensation tables
that are already present in the file. So i used "ncpXXxh103" instead
of "ncp15xh103".
Also, it was my first patch submitted to the Linux kernel. So I may have
been over thinking some things! With some hindsight, I see that the name is
misleading. I'm going to have to revisit this patch to make it more
'generic' for other thermistors, or make it more specific for this
particular thermistor.
I hope that answers your questions. Thanks for pointing this out to me.
Regards,
Joseph
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Maxime Jayat <jayatmaxime@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Joseph,
>
> You recently added support for the ncpXXxh103 in
> drivers/hwmon/ntc_thermistor.c with the following array of values:
>
> +static const struct ntc_compensation ncpXXxh103[] = {
> + { .temp_c = -40, .ohm = 247565 },
> + { .temp_c = -35, .ohm = 181742 },
> + { .temp_c = -30, .ohm = 135128 },
> + { .temp_c = -25, .ohm = 101678 },
> + { .temp_c = -20, .ohm = 77373 },
> + { .temp_c = -15, .ohm = 59504 },
> + { .temp_c = -10, .ohm = 46222 },
> + { .temp_c = -5, .ohm = 36244 },
> + { .temp_c = 0, .ohm = 28674 },
> + { .temp_c = 5, .ohm = 22878 },
> + { .temp_c = 10, .ohm = 18399 },
> + { .temp_c = 15, .ohm = 14910 },
> + { .temp_c = 20, .ohm = 12169 },
> + { .temp_c = 25, .ohm = 10000 },
> + { .temp_c = 30, .ohm = 8271 },
> + { .temp_c = 35, .ohm = 6883 },
> + { .temp_c = 40, .ohm = 5762 },
> + { .temp_c = 45, .ohm = 4851 },
> + { .temp_c = 50, .ohm = 4105 },
> + { .temp_c = 55, .ohm = 3492 },
> + { .temp_c = 60, .ohm = 2985 },
> + { .temp_c = 65, .ohm = 2563 },
> + { .temp_c = 70, .ohm = 2211 },
> + { .temp_c = 75, .ohm = 1915 },
> + { .temp_c = 80, .ohm = 1666 },
> + { .temp_c = 85, .ohm = 1454 },
> + { .temp_c = 90, .ohm = 1275 },
> + { .temp_c = 95, .ohm = 1121 },
> + { .temp_c = 100, .ohm = 990 },
> + { .temp_c = 105, .ohm = 876 },
> + { .temp_c = 110, .ohm = 779 },
> + { .temp_c = 115, .ohm = 694 },
> + { .temp_c = 120, .ohm = 620 },
> + { .temp_c = 125, .ohm = 556 },
> +};
> +
>
> Where are these taken from?
> Unlike the other thermistors in the file, these values don't seem to
> match anything in the Murata NTC Thermistor Datasheet.
> See:
>
> http://www.murata.com/~/media/webrenewal/support/library/catalog/products/thermistor/ntc/r44e.ashx
>
> --
> Maxime Jayat
>
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [lm-sensors] ncpXXxh103 compensation values?
2016-03-30 15:09 ` Joseph McNally
@ 2016-03-30 15:58 ` Maxime Jayat
2016-03-30 20:59 ` Guenter Roeck
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Jayat @ 2016-03-30 15:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joseph McNally; +Cc: Jean Delvare, Guenter Roeck, lm-sensors, linux-kernel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^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [lm-sensors] ncpXXxh103 compensation values?
2016-03-30 15:58 ` Maxime Jayat
@ 2016-03-30 20:59 ` Guenter Roeck
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2016-03-30 20:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Maxime Jayat; +Cc: Joseph McNally, Jean Delvare, lm-sensors, linux-kernel
Hi Maxime,
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 05:58:41PM +0200, Maxime Jayat wrote:
> I don't think it is wrong to use ncpXXxh103 instead of ncp15xh103,
> because the first number refers to the physical size of the thermistor
> and should not change its behavior. In fact the datasheet does the same
> kind of grouping.
>
> I was just wondering what was the reason for the discrepancy between the
> datasheet and your values.
> Indeed the datasheet I linked earlier, at page 15, gives you verbatim
> the content of this array and the result of your calculation does not
> match it.
> It is not _absurdly_ wrong but, at first sight, it seems like there is a
> 10 degrees difference at the extremes (but 10 kOhm at 25 C is correct).
>
Can the two of you sort this out and send me a fixup patch if necessary ?
Thanks,
Guenter
p.s.: Please don't top-post.
> Le 30/03/2016 17:09, Joseph McNally a écrit :
> > Hello Maxime,
> >
> > This data was calculated for a Murata NCP15XH103XXXXX.
> >
> > You have illustrated something to me with your question though. When I
> > uploaded this patch, I was following the format of the compensation
> > tables that are already present in the file. So i used "ncpXXxh103"
> > instead of "ncp15xh103". Also, it was my first patch submitted to the
> > Linux kernel. So I may have been over thinking some things! With some
> > hindsight, I see that the name is misleading. I'm going to have to
> > revisit this patch to make it more 'generic' for other thermistors, or
> > make it more specific for this particular thermistor.
> >
> > I hope that answers your questions. Thanks for pointing this out to me.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Joseph
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Maxime Jayat <jayatmaxime@gmail.com
> > <mailto:jayatmaxime@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Hello Joseph,
> >
> > You recently added support for the ncpXXxh103 in
> > drivers/hwmon/ntc_thermistor.c with the following array of values:
> >
> > +static const struct ntc_compensation ncpXXxh103[] = {
> > + { .temp_c = -40, .ohm = 247565 },
> > + { .temp_c = -35, .ohm = 181742 },
> > + { .temp_c = -30, .ohm = 135128 },
> > + { .temp_c = -25, .ohm = 101678 },
> > + { .temp_c = -20, .ohm = 77373 },
> > + { .temp_c = -15, .ohm = 59504 },
> > + { .temp_c = -10, .ohm = 46222 },
> > + { .temp_c = -5, .ohm = 36244 },
> > + { .temp_c = 0, .ohm = 28674 },
> > + { .temp_c = 5, .ohm = 22878 },
> > + { .temp_c = 10, .ohm = 18399 },
> > + { .temp_c = 15, .ohm = 14910 },
> > + { .temp_c = 20, .ohm = 12169 },
> > + { .temp_c = 25, .ohm = 10000 },
> > + { .temp_c = 30, .ohm = 8271 },
> > + { .temp_c = 35, .ohm = 6883 },
> > + { .temp_c = 40, .ohm = 5762 },
> > + { .temp_c = 45, .ohm = 4851 },
> > + { .temp_c = 50, .ohm = 4105 },
> > + { .temp_c = 55, .ohm = 3492 },
> > + { .temp_c = 60, .ohm = 2985 },
> > + { .temp_c = 65, .ohm = 2563 },
> > + { .temp_c = 70, .ohm = 2211 },
> > + { .temp_c = 75, .ohm = 1915 },
> > + { .temp_c = 80, .ohm = 1666 },
> > + { .temp_c = 85, .ohm = 1454 },
> > + { .temp_c = 90, .ohm = 1275 },
> > + { .temp_c = 95, .ohm = 1121 },
> > + { .temp_c = 100, .ohm = 990 },
> > + { .temp_c = 105, .ohm = 876 },
> > + { .temp_c = 110, .ohm = 779 },
> > + { .temp_c = 115, .ohm = 694 },
> > + { .temp_c = 120, .ohm = 620 },
> > + { .temp_c = 125, .ohm = 556 },
> > +};
> > +
> >
> > Where are these taken from?
> > Unlike the other thermistors in the file, these values don't seem to
> > match anything in the Murata NTC Thermistor Datasheet.
> > See:
> > http://www.murata.com/~/media/webrenewal/support/library/catalog/products/thermistor/ntc/r44e.ashx
> >
> > --
> > Maxime Jayat
> >
> >
> --
> Maxime Jayat
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-03-30 20:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-03-30 14:03 [lm-sensors] ncpXXxh103 compensation values? Maxime Jayat
2016-03-30 15:09 ` Joseph McNally
2016-03-30 15:58 ` Maxime Jayat
2016-03-30 20:59 ` Guenter Roeck
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox