From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, <loongarch@lists.linux.dev>,
<linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, <kvmarm@lists.linux.dev>,
<x86@kernel.org>, Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
<jianyong.wu@arm.com>, <justin.he@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 14/35] ACPI: Only enumerate enabled (or functional) devices
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 14:09:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230914140940.00001417@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230914132732.00006908@Huawei.com>
On Thu, 14 Sep 2023 13:27:32 +0100
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 16:38:02 +0000
> James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> wrote:
>
> > Today the ACPI enumeration code 'visits' all devices that are present.
> >
> > This is a problem for arm64, where CPUs are always present, but not
> > always enabled. When a device-check occurs because the firmware-policy
> > has changed and a CPU is now enabled, the following error occurs:
> > | acpi ACPI0007:48: Enumeration failure
> >
> > This is ultimately because acpi_dev_ready_for_enumeration() returns
> > true for a device that is not enabled. The ACPI Processor driver
> > will not register such CPUs as they are not 'decoding their resources'.
> >
> > Change acpi_dev_ready_for_enumeration() to also check the enabled bit.
> > ACPI allows a device to be functional instead of maintaining the
> > present and enabled bit. Make this behaviour an explicit check with
> > a reference to the spec, and then check the present and enabled bits.
>
> "and the" only applies if the functional route hasn't been followed
> "if not this case check the present and enabled bits."
>
> > This is needed to avoid enumerating present && functional devices that
> > are not enabled.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> > ---
> > If this change causes problems on deployed hardware, I suggest an
> > arch opt-in: ACPI_IGNORE_STA_ENABLED, that causes
> > acpi_dev_ready_for_enumeration() to only check the present bit.
> > ---
> > drivers/acpi/device_pm.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/acpi/device_sysfs.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/acpi/internal.h | 1 -
> > drivers/acpi/property.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/acpi/scan.c | 23 +++++++++++++----------
> > 5 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c b/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c
> > index f007116a8427..76c38478a502 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c
> > @@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ int acpi_bus_init_power(struct acpi_device *device)
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > device->power.state = ACPI_STATE_UNKNOWN;
> > - if (!acpi_device_is_present(device)) {
> > + if (!acpi_dev_ready_for_enumeration(device)) {
> > device->flags.initialized = false;
> > return -ENXIO;
> > }
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/device_sysfs.c b/drivers/acpi/device_sysfs.c
> > index b9bbf0746199..16e586d74aa2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/device_sysfs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/device_sysfs.c
> > @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ static int create_pnp_modalias(const struct acpi_device *acpi_dev, char *modalia
> > struct acpi_hardware_id *id;
> >
> > /* Avoid unnecessarily loading modules for non present devices. */
> > - if (!acpi_device_is_present(acpi_dev))
> > + if (!acpi_dev_ready_for_enumeration(acpi_dev))
> > return 0;
> >
> > /*
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/internal.h b/drivers/acpi/internal.h
> > index 866c7c4ed233..a1b45e345bcc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/internal.h
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/internal.h
> > @@ -107,7 +107,6 @@ int acpi_device_setup_files(struct acpi_device *dev);
> > void acpi_device_remove_files(struct acpi_device *dev);
> > void acpi_device_add_finalize(struct acpi_device *device);
> > void acpi_free_pnp_ids(struct acpi_device_pnp *pnp);
> > -bool acpi_device_is_present(const struct acpi_device *adev);
> > bool acpi_device_is_battery(struct acpi_device *adev);
> > bool acpi_device_is_first_physical_node(struct acpi_device *adev,
> > const struct device *dev);
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/property.c b/drivers/acpi/property.c
> > index 413e4fcadcaf..e03f00b98701 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/property.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/property.c
> > @@ -1418,7 +1418,7 @@ static bool acpi_fwnode_device_is_available(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
> > if (!is_acpi_device_node(fwnode))
> > return false;
> >
> > - return acpi_device_is_present(to_acpi_device_node(fwnode));
> > + return acpi_dev_ready_for_enumeration(to_acpi_device_node(fwnode));
> > }
> >
> > static const void *
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > index 17ab875a7d4e..f898591ce05f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > @@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ static int acpi_scan_device_check(struct acpi_device *adev)
> > int error;
> >
> > acpi_bus_get_status(adev);
> > - if (acpi_device_is_present(adev)) {
> > + if (acpi_dev_ready_for_enumeration(adev)) {
> > /*
> > * This function is only called for device objects for which
> > * matching scan handlers exist. The only situation in which
> > @@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ static int acpi_scan_bus_check(struct acpi_device *adev, void *not_used)
> > int error;
> >
> > acpi_bus_get_status(adev);
> > - if (!acpi_device_is_present(adev)) {
> > + if (!acpi_dev_ready_for_enumeration(adev)) {
> > acpi_scan_device_not_enumerated(adev);
> > return 0;
> > }
> > @@ -1908,11 +1908,6 @@ static bool acpi_device_should_be_hidden(acpi_handle handle)
> > return true;
> > }
> >
> > -bool acpi_device_is_present(const struct acpi_device *adev)
> > -{
> > - return adev->status.present || adev->status.functional;
> > -}
> > -
> > static bool acpi_scan_handler_matching(struct acpi_scan_handler *handler,
> > const char *idstr,
> > const struct acpi_device_id **matchid)
> > @@ -2375,16 +2370,24 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_dev_clear_dependencies);
> > * acpi_dev_ready_for_enumeration - Check if the ACPI device is ready for enumeration
> > * @device: Pointer to the &struct acpi_device to check
> > *
> > - * Check if the device is present and has no unmet dependencies.
> > + * Check if the device is functional or enabled and has no unmet dependencies.
> > *
> > - * Return true if the device is ready for enumeratino. Otherwise, return false.
> > + * Return true if the device is ready for enumeration. Otherwise, return false.
> > */
> > bool acpi_dev_ready_for_enumeration(const struct acpi_device *device)
> > {
> > if (device->flags.honor_deps && device->dep_unmet)
> > return false;
> >
> > - return acpi_device_is_present(device);
> > + /*
> > + * ACPI 6.5's 6.3.7 "_STA (Device Status)" allows firmware to return
> > + * (!present && functional) for certain types of devices that should be
> > + * enumerated.
>
> I'd call out the fact that enumeration isn't same as "device driver should be loaded"
> which is the thing that functional is supposed to indicate should not happen.
>
> > + */
> > + if (!device->status.present && !device->status.enabled)
>
> In theory no need to check !enabled if !present
> "If bit [0] is cleared, then bit 1 must also be cleared (in other words, a device that is not present cannot be enabled)."
> We could report an ACPI bug if that's seen. If that bug case is ignored this code can
> become the simpler.
>
> if (device->status.present)
> return device->status_enabled;
> else
> return device->status.functional;
>
> Or the following also valid here (as functional should be set for enabled present devices
> unless they failed diagnostics).
>
> if (dev->status.functional)
> return true;
> return device->status.present && device->status.enabled;
>
> On assumption we want to enumerate dead devices for debug purposes...
Actually ignore this. Could have weird race with present, functional true,
but enabled not quite set - despite the device being there and self
tests having passed.
>
>
> > + return device->status.functional;
> > +
> > + return device->status.present && device->status.enabled;
>
>
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_dev_ready_for_enumeration);
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-14 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 152+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-13 16:37 [RFC PATCH v2 00/35] ACPI/arm64: add support for virtual cpuhotplug James Morse
2023-09-13 16:37 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/35] ACPI: Move ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU to be disabled on arm64 and riscv James Morse
2023-09-14 8:54 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-13 16:37 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/35] drivers: base: Use present CPUs in GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES James Morse
2023-09-14 8:20 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-14 10:56 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-09-14 11:11 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-14 10:56 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-09-13 16:37 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/35] drivers: base: Allow parts of GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES to be overridden James Morse
2023-09-14 8:33 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-14 11:00 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-09-14 11:05 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-09-13 16:37 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/35] drivers: base: Move cpu_dev_init() after node_dev_init() James Morse
2023-09-14 9:40 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-14 11:16 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-09-13 16:37 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/35] drivers: base: Print a warning instead of panic() when register_cpu() fails James Morse
2023-09-14 9:52 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-18 3:33 ` Gavin Shan
2023-10-20 11:16 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-13 16:37 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/35] arm64: setup: Switch over to GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES using arch_register_cpu() James Morse
2023-09-14 9:56 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-14 11:27 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-09-14 14:07 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-14 14:56 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-09-13 16:37 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/35] x86: intel_epb: Don't rely on link order James Morse
2023-09-14 10:02 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-18 3:48 ` Gavin Shan
2023-09-13 16:37 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/35] x86/topology: Switch over to GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES James Morse
2023-09-14 10:01 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-14 11:40 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-09-13 16:37 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/35] LoongArch: " James Morse
2023-09-14 10:03 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-14 11:47 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-09-13 16:37 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/35] riscv: " James Morse
2023-09-14 10:04 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-14 11:48 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-09-13 16:37 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/35] arch_topology: Make register_cpu_capacity_sysctl() tolerant to late CPUs James Morse
2023-09-14 12:01 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-20 11:53 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-10-21 10:56 ` Greg KH
2023-10-20 13:44 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-11-14 10:04 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-11-30 16:46 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-09-13 16:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/35] ACPI: Use the acpi_device_is_present() helper in more places James Morse
2023-09-14 12:04 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-09-18 4:06 ` Gavin Shan
2023-09-13 16:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/35] ACPI: Rename acpi_scan_device_not_present() to be about enumeration James Morse
2023-09-18 4:13 ` Gavin Shan
2023-10-20 16:01 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-10-20 16:41 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-09-13 16:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/35] ACPI: Only enumerate enabled (or functional) devices James Morse
2023-09-14 12:27 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-09-14 13:09 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2023-10-20 15:32 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-10-20 16:43 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-09-18 4:38 ` Gavin Shan
2023-09-18 23:43 ` Gavin Shan
2023-10-20 15:45 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-13 16:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/35] ACPI: processor: Add support for processors described as container packages James Morse
2023-09-14 13:53 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-11-03 10:43 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-11-03 10:57 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-11-03 12:52 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-09-18 5:02 ` Gavin Shan
2023-11-03 10:54 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-11-03 11:37 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-13 16:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 16/35] ACPI: processor: Register CPUs that are online, but not described in the DSDT James Morse
2023-09-14 13:56 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-09-18 5:12 ` Gavin Shan
2023-09-13 16:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 17/35] ACPI: processor: Register all CPUs from acpi_processor_get_info() James Morse
2023-09-18 5:19 ` Gavin Shan
2023-09-13 16:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 18/35] ACPI: Rename ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU to include 'present' James Morse
2023-09-18 5:22 ` Gavin Shan
2023-09-13 16:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 19/35] ACPI: Move acpi_bus_trim_one() before acpi_scan_hot_remove() James Morse
2023-09-14 14:10 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-09-18 5:36 ` Gavin Shan
2023-09-13 16:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 20/35] ACPI: Rename acpi_processor_hotadd_init and remove pre-processor guards James Morse
2023-09-14 14:17 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-09-18 5:50 ` Gavin Shan
2023-10-23 20:01 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-13 16:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 21/35] ACPI: Add post_eject to struct acpi_scan_handler for cpu hotplug James Morse
2023-09-14 14:28 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-09-19 0:31 ` Gavin Shan
2023-09-13 16:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 22/35] ACPI: Check _STA present bit before making CPUs not present James Morse
2023-09-14 14:31 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-11-03 14:09 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-19 0:45 ` Gavin Shan
2023-11-03 14:37 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-13 16:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 23/35] ACPI: Warn when the present bit changes but the feature is not enabled James Morse
2023-09-14 14:32 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-09-19 0:49 ` Gavin Shan
2023-09-13 16:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 24/35] drivers: base: Implement weak arch_unregister_cpu() James Morse
2023-09-14 14:39 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-09-19 0:59 ` Gavin Shan
2023-10-23 8:44 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-10-23 8:55 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-13 16:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 25/35] LoongArch: Use the __weak version of arch_unregister_cpu() James Morse
2023-09-14 14:41 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-23 8:48 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-19 1:09 ` Gavin Shan
2023-09-13 16:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 26/35] arm64: acpi: Move get_cpu_for_acpi_id() to a header James Morse
2023-09-14 14:43 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-09-19 1:16 ` Gavin Shan
2023-09-13 16:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 27/35] ACPICA: Add new MADT GICC flags fields [code first?] James Morse
2023-09-14 7:57 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-09-14 14:54 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-09-14 15:34 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-09-14 15:49 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-15 2:29 ` Salil Mehta
2023-09-15 7:09 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-15 8:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-09-15 9:34 ` Salil Mehta
2023-09-15 10:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-09-15 14:49 ` Salil Mehta
2023-09-15 15:16 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-15 16:46 ` Salil Mehta
2023-09-15 13:43 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-15 15:17 ` Salil Mehta
2023-09-15 15:32 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-09-15 17:12 ` Salil Mehta
2023-09-15 15:41 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-15 17:07 ` Salil Mehta
2023-09-15 9:21 ` Salil Mehta
2023-09-14 14:48 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-09-13 16:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 28/35] arm64, irqchip/gic-v3, ACPI: Move MADT GICC enabled check into a helper James Morse
2023-09-14 8:09 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-14 14:58 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-09-19 1:23 ` Gavin Shan
2023-09-13 16:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 29/35] irqchip/gic-v3: Don't return errors from gic_acpi_match_gicc() James Morse
2023-09-14 15:02 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-23 18:58 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-19 3:39 ` Gavin Shan
2023-09-19 3:51 ` Gavin Shan
2023-09-13 16:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 30/35] irqchip/gic-v3: Add support for ACPI's disabled but 'online capable' CPUs James Morse
2023-09-14 8:10 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-19 3:53 ` Gavin Shan
2023-09-13 16:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 31/35] arm64: psci: Ignore DENIED CPUs James Morse
2023-09-14 16:01 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-09-19 4:31 ` Gavin Shan
2023-09-13 16:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 32/35] ACPI: add support to register CPUs based on the _STA enabled bit James Morse
2023-09-14 16:13 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-09-19 10:24 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-19 4:46 ` Gavin Shan
2023-09-19 9:55 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-13 16:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 33/35] arm64: document virtual CPU hotplug's expectations James Morse
2023-09-14 16:41 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-09-13 16:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 34/35] ACPI: Add _OSC bits to advertise OS support for toggling CPU present/enabled James Morse
2023-09-14 16:50 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-09-13 16:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 35/35] cpumask: Add enabled cpumask for present CPUs that can be brought online James Morse
2023-09-14 16:54 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-09-18 10:27 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/35] ACPI/arm64: add support for virtual cpuhotplug Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-26 13:16 ` Salil Mehta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230914140940.00001417@Huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=jianyong.wu@arm.com \
--cc=justin.he@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=salil.mehta@huawei.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox