From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2B413C14 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 16:22:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1665505328; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=6gv22bmoTax0J0zhnmYTJUdzNvY/rZYRIc0hd8rouMg=; b=h5iy8YxiHkC4Kaa6hKdsVflcNHsfyFKnRCMfGVAb6j4l+J6CC+IO/MO0oYNyJuBeXQy2sL 4uRVxYLTlT3dfO5HE9nlYFAz6+2B1j+BcEcKdmL6EogdvQvzsR6dbn1F12zBI/qvnCKJ9W 4lRmLYgtG0lfeQg/+i46P0neW2oLejY= Received: from mail-ed1-f70.google.com (mail-ed1-f70.google.com [209.85.208.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id us-mta-3-rsmzJ4ZBNJimPUPrTen2mg-1; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 12:22:07 -0400 X-MC-Unique: rsmzJ4ZBNJimPUPrTen2mg-1 Received: by mail-ed1-f70.google.com with SMTP id s17-20020a056402521100b0045bfaaab697so5349932edd.1 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 09:22:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=6gv22bmoTax0J0zhnmYTJUdzNvY/rZYRIc0hd8rouMg=; b=yWU7H6F2lXI+Qj5APSRvzdnCwE1fQIgxWUBUvAIrwYJsO8NxKZb4olBlvXEezrM2GD zh/zCFWShjN5T/6g0P93Byk6wOGonjWpDjYKBPz20BMRe4+XK2GaDn0ZsbWroXfnHOom AVdpAhEGKpWdeAYYaapRNlOd/hTTHG0ZnFlajfplB/cDh+ocZg16vByNArPOIT/kLNoH OMhrlWdLwhUqNk9JB06fQ9S6NOpTJVo9pFnuby86fAMxnY8tr7IuM3Ko8rmPtQTr/K+8 iDmPXydl1eCiJ4GGV74QZzmCYzSjJW0tBnGbA9nvBykcV0crfZUfFhF7LFBmEb34wfAR bPAw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf1bKiLTDMpy/ZtzOx8Lf6L7+bKteeiXDV7ZfhDZu4A0md31H9Mm J1moucap9u+b2MWOFXwVzHjGORt3LcjURP9IgguGhojTisyywMcHzZ6j0Gj/R683Vrp2w/1cLjv V2BlELuGTu+hspI8NQuzJ X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:2712:b0:78d:a223:729b with SMTP id w18-20020a170907271200b0078da223729bmr11697137ejk.443.1665505325958; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 09:22:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5z3+5ecaWwqYPDE234CAcuf3hKc1qLTNOp8VUNiMDwybT1F6EbMEGGKCCgL+v4lylioGXOig== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:2712:b0:78d:a223:729b with SMTP id w18-20020a170907271200b0078da223729bmr11697097ejk.443.1665505325743; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 09:22:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.198] (host-79-47-205-133.retail.telecomitalia.it. [79.47.205.133]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id xf13-20020a17090731cd00b00730b3bdd8d7sm7273113ejb.179.2022.10.11.09.22.03 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 11 Oct 2022 09:22:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3e680bb9-9896-3665-dd59-4f2e6f8205bb@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 18:22:03 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: loongarch@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.3.1 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Generic IPI sending tracepoint To: Valentin Schneider Cc: linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, openrisc@lists.librecores.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, x86@kernel.org, "Paul E. McKenney" , Steven Rostedt , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Juri Lelli , Frederic Weisbecker , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , "H. Peter Anvin" , Marc Zyngier , Mark Rutland , Russell King , Nicholas Piggin , Marcelo Tosatti , Guo Ren , "David S. Miller" , Douglas RAILLARD References: <20221007154145.1877054-1-vschneid@redhat.com> From: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira In-Reply-To: X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10/11/22 18:17, Valentin Schneider wrote: > Thinking out loud, it makes way more sense to record a cpumask in the > tracepoint, but perhaps we could have a postprocessing step to transform > those into N events each targeting a single CPU? My approach on the tracers/rtla is to make the simple things in kernel, and beautify things in user-space. You could keep the tracepoint as a mask, and then make it pretty, like cpus=3-5,8 in user-space. For example with a trace-cmd/perf loadable plugin, libtracefs helper. For rtla I was thinking to make a new tool to parse them. and make it pretty there. -- Daniel