[LTP] [PATCH] fix "sched_getparam/6-1" and "sched_getscheduler/7-1" tests

["Mitani" <mitani@ryobi.co.jp>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2354 bytes --]

Hi,


Following POSIX testsets failed:
------------
conformance/interfaces/sched_getparam/6-1: execution: FAILED: Output:
Testing with user 'bin' (euid: 1)(uid: 1)
The function sched_getparam has successed.
------------

------------
conformance/interfaces/sched_getscheduler/7-1: execution: FAILED: Output:
Testing with user 'bin' (uid: 1)
The function sched_getscheduler has successed.
------------

The environments are as follows:
  - RHEL4.8 --- (x86, x86_64, ia64)
  - kernel  --- kernel-2.6.9-89.EL
  - glibc   --- glibc-2.3.4-2.43

  - RHEL5.5 --- (x86, x86_64, ia64)
  - kernel  --- kernel-2.6.18-194.el5
  - glibc   --- glibc-2.5-49


They are permission tests.

The comment of "sched_getparam/6-1" testset source is as follows:
------------
  * On Linux, e.g, the kernel makes no check on user permission to call this
  * API. So basically we don't know on what condition a system should return
  * EPERM. It is implementation defined.
------------


Therefore I revised their results to "UNRESOLVED" by judging linux
environment.

Signed-off-by: Tomonori Mitani <mitani@ryobi.co.jp>
============
---
a/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/sched_getparam/6-1.c
2010-12-08 15:39:45.000000000 +0900
+++
b/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/sched_getparam/6-1.c
2010-12-08 13:48:51.000000000 +0900
@@ -65,6 +65,11 @@
 	struct sched_param param;
 	int result = -1;
 
+#ifdef __linux__
+	printf("We don't know on what condition a system should return
EPERM.\n");
+        return PTS_UNRESOLVED;
+#endif
+
 	/* We assume process Number 1 is created by root */
 	/* and can only be accessed by root */ 
 	/* This test should be run under standard user permissions */
============

============
---
a/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/sched_getscheduler/7
-1.c	2010-11-12 02:19:16.000000000 +0900
+++
b/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/sched_getscheduler/7
-1.c	2010-12-08 15:42:23.000000000 +0900
@@ -55,6 +55,11 @@
 
 	int result = -1;
 
+#ifdef __linux__
+	printf("We don't know on what condition a system should return
EPERM.\n");
+	return PTS_UNRESOLVED;
+#endif
+
 	/* We assume process Number 1 is created by root */
 	/* and can only be accessed by root */ 
 	/* This test should be run under standard user permissions */
============



Regards--

-Tomonori Mitani

[-- Attachment #2: 7-1.patch --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 588 bytes --]

--- a/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/sched_getscheduler/7-1.c	2010-11-12 02:19:16.000000000 +0900
+++ b/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/sched_getscheduler/7-1.c	2010-12-08 15:42:23.000000000 +0900
@@ -55,6 +55,11 @@
 
 	int result = -1;
 
+#ifdef __linux__
+	printf("We don't know on what condition a system should return EPERM.\n");
+	return PTS_UNRESOLVED;
+#endif
+
 	/* We assume process Number 1 is created by root */
 	/* and can only be accessed by root */ 
 	/* This test should be run under standard user permissions */

[-- Attachment #3: 6-1.patch --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 613 bytes --]

--- a/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/sched_getparam/6-1.c	2010-12-08 15:39:45.000000000 +0900
+++ b/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/sched_getparam/6-1.c	2010-12-08 13:48:51.000000000 +0900
@@ -65,6 +65,11 @@
 	struct sched_param param;
 	int result = -1;
 
+#ifdef __linux__
+	printf("We don't know on what condition a system should return EPERM.\n");
+        return PTS_UNRESOLVED;
+#endif
+
 	/* We assume process Number 1 is created by root */
 	/* and can only be accessed by root */ 
 	/* This test should be run under standard user permissions */

[-- Attachment #4: Type: text/plain, Size: 450 bytes --]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What happens now with your Lotus Notes apps - do you make another costly 
upgrade, or settle for being marooned without product support? Time to move
off Lotus Notes and onto the cloud with Force.com, apps are easier to build,
use, and manage than apps on traditional platforms. Sign up for the Lotus 
Notes Migration Kit to learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/salesforce-d2d

[-- Attachment #5: Type: text/plain, Size: 155 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list