public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [LTP] Build failure with 2010-01-07 cvs
@ 2010-01-07  7:55 Mitani
  2010-01-07  9:32 ` Garrett Cooper
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mitani @ 2010-01-07  7:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ltp-list

Hi,

I tried to make with latest version (2010-01-07 cvs) in RHEL4.8
(2.6.9-89.ELsmp).
But it failed with following message:
------------
gcc -g -O2 -g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Wall
-I/home/LTP/ltp-2010-01-07/testcases/kernel/include -g
-I/home/LTP/ltp-2010-01-07/testcases/kernel/syscalls/get_mempolicy/../utils
-DNUMA_VERSION1_COMPATIBILITY -I../../../../include -I../../../../include
-L../../../../lib  get_mempolicy01.c   -lltp -lnuma -o get_mempolicy01
In file included from get_mempolicy01.c:78:
/home/LTP/ltp-2010-01-07/testcases/kernel/syscalls/get_mempolicy/../utils/nu
ma_helpers.h:81: error: redefinition of 'nodemask_set'
/usr/include/numa.h:45: error: previous definition of 'nodemask_set' was
here
/home/LTP/ltp-2010-01-07/testcases/kernel/syscalls/get_mempolicy/../utils/nu
ma_helpers.h:95: error: redefinition of 'nodemask_dump'
/home/LTP/ltp-2010-01-07/testcases/kernel/syscalls/get_mempolicy/../utils/nu
maif.h:85: error: previous definition of 'nodemask_dump' was here
make[4]: *** [get_mempolicy01] Error 1
------------

"numa_helpers.h" is as follows (comments are omitted):
------------
#ifndef LTP_NUMA_HELPERS_H
#define LTP_NUMA_HELPERS_H

#include "config.h"
#if HAVE_NUMA_H
#include <numa.h>

static inline void nodemask_set(nodemask_t *mask, int node)

{                                                       <----- L.81
        mask->n[node / (8*sizeof(unsigned long))] |=
                (1UL << (node % (8*sizeof(unsigned long))));
}

static inline void nodemask_dump(const char *header, const nodemask_t *mask)
{                                                       <----- L.95
        int i;
        EPRINTF("%s", header);
        for (i = 0; i < NUMA_NUM_NODES/(sizeof(unsigned long)*8); i++)
                EPRINTF(" 0x%08lx", mask->n[i]);
        EPRINTF("\n");
}

#else

typedef struct nodemask_t { };

static inline void nodemask_set(nodemask_t *mask, int node)
{
        return;
}

static inline void nodemask_dump(const char *header, const nodemask_t *mask)
{
        return;
}

#endif

#endif
------------

In my system, HAVE_NUMA_H is defined as 1.

The function "nodemask_set" defined in "/usr/include/numa.h" is same
as the one of "numa_helpers.h".
And the function "nodemask_dump" defined in "${LTPROOT}/testcases/kernel
/syscalls/utils/numa_helpers" is same as the one of "numa_helpers.h".

Why are the same definitions necessary in "numa_helpers.h" on purpose?


I'm glad if I get your help.


Regards--


-Tomonori Mitani



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev 
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [LTP] Build failure with 2010-01-07 cvs
  2010-01-07  7:55 [LTP] Build failure with 2010-01-07 cvs Mitani
@ 2010-01-07  9:32 ` Garrett Cooper
  2010-01-07 11:37   ` Subrata Modak
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Garrett Cooper @ 2010-01-07  9:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mitani; +Cc: ltp-list

On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Mitani <mitani@ryobi.co.jp> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to make with latest version (2010-01-07 cvs) in RHEL4.8
> (2.6.9-89.ELsmp).
> But it failed with following message:
> ------------
> gcc -g -O2 -g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Wall
> -I/home/LTP/ltp-2010-01-07/testcases/kernel/include -g
> -I/home/LTP/ltp-2010-01-07/testcases/kernel/syscalls/get_mempolicy/../utils
> -DNUMA_VERSION1_COMPATIBILITY -I../../../../include -I../../../../include
> -L../../../../lib  get_mempolicy01.c   -lltp -lnuma -o get_mempolicy01
> In file included from get_mempolicy01.c:78:
> /home/LTP/ltp-2010-01-07/testcases/kernel/syscalls/get_mempolicy/../utils/nu
> ma_helpers.h:81: error: redefinition of 'nodemask_set'
> /usr/include/numa.h:45: error: previous definition of 'nodemask_set' was
> here
> /home/LTP/ltp-2010-01-07/testcases/kernel/syscalls/get_mempolicy/../utils/nu
> ma_helpers.h:95: error: redefinition of 'nodemask_dump'
> /home/LTP/ltp-2010-01-07/testcases/kernel/syscalls/get_mempolicy/../utils/nu
> maif.h:85: error: previous definition of 'nodemask_dump' was here
> make[4]: *** [get_mempolicy01] Error 1
> ------------
>
> "numa_helpers.h" is as follows (comments are omitted):
> ------------
> #ifndef LTP_NUMA_HELPERS_H
> #define LTP_NUMA_HELPERS_H
>
> #include "config.h"
> #if HAVE_NUMA_H
> #include <numa.h>
>
> static inline void nodemask_set(nodemask_t *mask, int node)
>
> {                                                       <----- L.81
>        mask->n[node / (8*sizeof(unsigned long))] |=
>                (1UL << (node % (8*sizeof(unsigned long))));
> }
>
> static inline void nodemask_dump(const char *header, const nodemask_t *mask)
> {                                                       <----- L.95
>        int i;
>        EPRINTF("%s", header);
>        for (i = 0; i < NUMA_NUM_NODES/(sizeof(unsigned long)*8); i++)
>                EPRINTF(" 0x%08lx", mask->n[i]);
>        EPRINTF("\n");
> }
>
> #else
>
> typedef struct nodemask_t { };
>
> static inline void nodemask_set(nodemask_t *mask, int node)
> {
>        return;
> }
>
> static inline void nodemask_dump(const char *header, const nodemask_t *mask)
> {
>        return;
> }
>
> #endif
>
> #endif
> ------------
>
> In my system, HAVE_NUMA_H is defined as 1.
>
> The function "nodemask_set" defined in "/usr/include/numa.h" is same
> as the one of "numa_helpers.h".
> And the function "nodemask_dump" defined in "${LTPROOT}/testcases/kernel
> /syscalls/utils/numa_helpers" is same as the one of "numa_helpers.h".
>
> Why are the same definitions necessary in "numa_helpers.h" on purpose?
>
>
> I'm glad if I get your help.

    Try now please.
Thanks,
-Garrett

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev 
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [LTP] Build failure with 2010-01-07 cvs
  2010-01-07  9:32 ` Garrett Cooper
@ 2010-01-07 11:37   ` Subrata Modak
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Subrata Modak @ 2010-01-07 11:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Garrett Cooper; +Cc: ltp-list, Mitani

Garret,

On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 01:32 -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: 
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Mitani <mitani@ryobi.co.jp> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I tried to make with latest version (2010-01-07 cvs) in RHEL4.8
> > (2.6.9-89.ELsmp).
> > But it failed with following message:
> > ------------
> > gcc -g -O2 -g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Wall
> > -I/home/LTP/ltp-2010-01-07/testcases/kernel/include -g
> > -I/home/LTP/ltp-2010-01-07/testcases/kernel/syscalls/get_mempolicy/../utils
> > -DNUMA_VERSION1_COMPATIBILITY -I../../../../include -I../../../../include
> > -L../../../../lib  get_mempolicy01.c   -lltp -lnuma -o get_mempolicy01
> > In file included from get_mempolicy01.c:78:
> > /home/LTP/ltp-2010-01-07/testcases/kernel/syscalls/get_mempolicy/../utils/nu
> > ma_helpers.h:81: error: redefinition of 'nodemask_set'
> > /usr/include/numa.h:45: error: previous definition of 'nodemask_set' was
> > here
> > /home/LTP/ltp-2010-01-07/testcases/kernel/syscalls/get_mempolicy/../utils/nu
> > ma_helpers.h:95: error: redefinition of 'nodemask_dump'
> > /home/LTP/ltp-2010-01-07/testcases/kernel/syscalls/get_mempolicy/../utils/nu
> > maif.h:85: error: previous definition of 'nodemask_dump' was here
> > make[4]: *** [get_mempolicy01] Error 1
> > ------------
> >
> > "numa_helpers.h" is as follows (comments are omitted):
> > ------------
> > #ifndef LTP_NUMA_HELPERS_H
> > #define LTP_NUMA_HELPERS_H
> >
> > #include "config.h"
> > #if HAVE_NUMA_H
> > #include <numa.h>
> >
> > static inline void nodemask_set(nodemask_t *mask, int node)
> >
> > {                                                       <----- L.81
> >        mask->n[node / (8*sizeof(unsigned long))] |=
> >                (1UL << (node % (8*sizeof(unsigned long))));
> > }
> >
> > static inline void nodemask_dump(const char *header, const nodemask_t *mask)
> > {                                                       <----- L.95
> >        int i;
> >        EPRINTF("%s", header);
> >        for (i = 0; i < NUMA_NUM_NODES/(sizeof(unsigned long)*8); i++)
> >                EPRINTF(" 0x%08lx", mask->n[i]);
> >        EPRINTF("\n");
> > }
> >
> > #else
> >
> > typedef struct nodemask_t { };
> >
> > static inline void nodemask_set(nodemask_t *mask, int node)
> > {
> >        return;
> > }
> >
> > static inline void nodemask_dump(const char *header, const nodemask_t *mask)
> > {
> >        return;
> > }
> >
> > #endif
> >
> > #endif
> > ------------
> >
> > In my system, HAVE_NUMA_H is defined as 1.
> >
> > The function "nodemask_set" defined in "/usr/include/numa.h" is same
> > as the one of "numa_helpers.h".
> > And the function "nodemask_dump" defined in "${LTPROOT}/testcases/kernel
> > /syscalls/utils/numa_helpers" is same as the one of "numa_helpers.h".
> >
> > Why are the same definitions necessary in "numa_helpers.h" on purpose?
> >
> >
> > I'm glad if I get your help.
> 
>     Try now please.
> Thanks,
> -Garrett

The get_mempolicy01 and mbind01 had build errors even for the December
2009 release. So, i have removed them and their reference in the tar.

Regards--
Subrata

> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
> Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
> A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
> Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev 
> _______________________________________________
> Ltp-list mailing list
> Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev 
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-01-07 11:39 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-01-07  7:55 [LTP] Build failure with 2010-01-07 cvs Mitani
2010-01-07  9:32 ` Garrett Cooper
2010-01-07 11:37   ` Subrata Modak

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox