From: Filippo ARCIDIACONO <filippo.arcidiacono@st.com>
To: gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] getrusage04: add opportunity to increase the max [us]time increment
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 11:21:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <016501ccf214$f5f05da0$e1d118e0$@arcidiacono@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F4609F6.5060008@cn.fujitsu.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wanlong Gao [mailto:gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 10:42 AM
> To: Filippo ARCIDIACONO
> Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] getrusage04: add opportunity to increase the
> max [us]time increment
>
> On 02/23/2012 04:23 PM, Filippo ARCIDIACONO wrote:
>
> > From: Filippo Arcidiacono <filippo.arcidiacono@st.com>
> >
> > On slow systems it could be needed to increase the max value [us]time
> > increment beetween two getrusage calls.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Filippo Arcidiacono <filippo.arcidiacono@st.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Salvatore Cro <salvatore.cro@st.com>
> > ---
> > testcases/kernel/syscalls/getrusage/getrusage04.c | 42
> +++++++++++++++++---
> > 1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/getrusage/getrusage04.c
> b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/getrusage/getrusage04.c
> > index 3bdd3b0..92f8361 100644
> > --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/getrusage/getrusage04.c
> > +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/getrusage/getrusage04.c
> > @@ -54,11 +54,22 @@ int TST_TOTAL = 1;
> >
> > #define BIAS_MAX 1000
> > #define RECORD_MAX 20
> > +#define FACTOR_MAX 10
> >
> > #ifndef RUSAGE_THREAD
> > #define RUSAGE_THREAD 1
> > #endif
> >
> > +static int opt_factor;
> > +static char *factor_str;
> > +static long factor_nr = 1;
> > +
> > +option_t child_options[] = {
> > + { "m:", &opt_factor, &factor_str },
> > + { NULL, NULL, NULL }
> > +};
> > +
> > +static void fusage(void);
> > static void busyloop(long wait);
> > static void setup(void);
> > static void cleanup(void);
> > @@ -69,8 +80,9 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > unsigned long ulast, udelta, slast, sdelta;
> > int i, lc;
> > char *msg;
> > + char msg_string[BUFSIZ];
> >
> > - msg = parse_opts(argc, argv, NULL, NULL);
> > + msg = parse_opts(argc, argv, child_options, fusage);
> > if (msg != NULL)
> > tst_brkm(TBROK, NULL, "OPTION PARSING ERROR - %s", msg);
> >
> > @@ -80,6 +92,11 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> >
> > setup();
> >
> > + if (opt_factor)
> > + factor_nr = SAFE_STRTOL(cleanup, factor_str, 0,
> FACTOR_MAX);
> > +
> > + tst_resm(TINFO, "Using %ld as multiply factor for max [us]time
> increment (1000+%ldus)!", factor_nr, BIAS_MAX * factor_nr);
>
>
> Could you please fix the over 80 characters warning?
Ok.
>
> > +
> > for (lc = 0; TEST_LOOPING(lc); lc++) {
> > Tst_count = 0; i = 0;
> > ulast = 0, slast = 0;
> > @@ -95,14 +112,20 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > tst_resm(TINFO, "utime:%12luus;
stime:%12luus",
> > usage.ru_utime.tv_usec,
> > usage.ru_stime.tv_usec);
> > - if (udelta > 1000+BIAS_MAX)
> > - tst_brkm(TFAIL, cleanup,
> > - "utime increased >
1000us:"
> > + if (udelta > 1000+(BIAS_MAX * factor_nr)) {
> > + sprintf(msg_string,
> > + "utime increased > %ldus:",
> > + 1000 + BIAS_MAX *
factor_nr);
> > + tst_brkm(TFAIL, cleanup, msg_string,
> > " delta = %luus",
udelta);
> > - if (sdelta > 1000+BIAS_MAX)
> > - tst_brkm(TFAIL, cleanup,
> > - "stime increased >
1000us:"
> > + }
> > + if (sdelta > 1000+(BIAS_MAX * factor_nr)) {
> > + sprintf(msg_string,
> > + "stime increased > %ldus:",
> > + 1000 + BIAS_MAX *
factor_nr);
> > + tst_brkm(TFAIL, cleanup, msg_string,
> > " delta = %luus",
sdelta);
> > + }
> > }
> > ulast = usage.ru_utime.tv_usec;
> > slast = usage.ru_stime.tv_usec;
> > @@ -113,6 +136,11 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > tst_exit();
> > }
> >
> > +static void fusage(void)
> > +{
> > + printf(" -m n use n as multiply factor for max [us]time
> increment (1000+(1000*n)us), default value is 1\n");
>
>
> ditto
>
>
> Thanks
> -Wanlong Gao
I'll post a new version.
Thanks for the review.
Filippo.
>
> > +}
> > +
> > static void busyloop(long wait)
> > {
> > while (wait--)
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing
also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-23 10:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-23 8:23 [LTP] [PATCH] getrusage04: add opportunity to increase the max [us]time increment Filippo ARCIDIACONO
2012-02-23 9:42 ` Wanlong Gao
2012-02-23 10:21 ` Filippo ARCIDIACONO [this message]
[not found] <4f45f838.8aa82a0a.6cc7.334fSMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com>
2012-06-18 8:50 ` Andrew Yan-Pai Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='016501ccf214$f5f05da0$e1d118e0$@arcidiacono@st.com' \
--to=filippo.arcidiacono@st.com \
--cc=gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox