From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] mem/lib: Keep KSM off when child_alloc() allocate memory in single thread
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 04:39:50 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1126821490.620692.1466498390955.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160621075613.GB24636@gmail.com>
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Li Wang" <liwang@redhat.com>
> To: "Jan Stancek" <jstancek@redhat.com>
> Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
> Sent: Tuesday, 21 June, 2016 9:56:13 AM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] mem/lib: Keep KSM off when child_alloc() allocate memory in single thread
> > What if KSM was enabled before test started?
>
> From what I know about KSM, if a memory area affected by function
> madvise(..., MADV_MERGEABLE), the samepages located in that merory will be
> easily merged by ksmd as long as we turn it on (echo 1
> >/sys/kernel/mm/ksm/run).
>
> And the ".../ksm/run" default value is 0, it means if we just affect
> the memory area by madvise() function but with ksmd off, there won't
> have any samepages be merged.
True, but there's no guarantee that every distro and every user will
keep the default set to 0. As I recall IBM's PowerKVM has KSM enabled
by default.
> > I'd skip this entire else block if lite == 1. With KSM off, it's nearly
> > identical to oom(NORMAL).
>
> Hmm, actually there still have a little bit difference from
> oom(NORMALNORMAL).
>
> In alloc_mem() function, if testcase == KSM, the memory area will do
> madvise operation like:
> madvise(s, length, MADV_MERGEABLE)
That's what I meant by "nearly identical". Looking at kernel,
only ksm seems to care about that flag, and we turn KSM off:
$ grep -l MADV_MERGEABLE -r mm/
mm/Kconfig
mm/madvise.c
mm/ksm.c
Regards,
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-21 8:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-21 3:39 [LTP] [PATCH] mem/lib: Keep KSM off when child_alloc() allocate memory in single thread Li Wang
2016-06-21 7:00 ` Jan Stancek
2016-06-21 7:56 ` Li Wang
2016-06-21 8:39 ` Jan Stancek [this message]
2016-06-21 9:07 ` Li Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1126821490.620692.1466498390955.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
--to=jstancek@redhat.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox