From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] msgstress04: make sure not pass IPC_PRIVATE to msgget
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 05:24:00 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1149365280.71650211.1541759040124.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181108093324.14028-1-kai.kang@windriver.com>
----- Original Message -----
> From: Kai Kang <kai.kang@windriver.com>
>
> It fails to run case msgstress04:
>
> $ ./msgstress04 -n 1 -c 1 -l 1
>
> It only inits the first MSGMNI members of keyarray. So if argument off
> of function dotest_iteration is greater than MSGMNI, the argument key
> passed to function dotest() will be IPC_PRIVATE(0) which will finally
> pass to syscall msgget(), then cause case fails.
>
> Make sure get the value for key from the initialized members of keyarray.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kai Kang <kai.kang@windriver.com>
> ---
> testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/msgstress/msgstress04.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/msgstress/msgstress04.c
> b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/msgstress/msgstress04.c
> index 18fad4fbd..a357ce59a 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/msgstress/msgstress04.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/msgstress/msgstress04.c
> @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ static void dotest_iteration(int off)
> memset(pidarray, 0, sizeof(pidarray));
>
> for (i = 0; i < nprocs; i++) {
> - key = keyarray[off + i];
> + key = keyarray[(off + i) % MSGMNI];
Hi,
Isn't this going to pick same key over and over again?
Say maxnprocs is '1', and MSGMNI is 10000:
dotest_iteration(i*(10000 / 1));
will become:
key = keyarray[(10000 + 0) % 10000];
key = keyarray[(20000 + 0) % 10000];
key = keyarray[(30000 + 0) % 10000];
...
If test intention is to exercise queues for all keys, shouldn't we fix main() instead?
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/msgstress/msgstress04.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/msgstress/msgstress04.c
index 18fad4fbdca1..81383d6c8b11 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/msgstress/msgstress04.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/msgstress/msgstress04.c
@@ -176,11 +176,11 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
} else {
for (i = 0; i < (MSGMNI / maxnprocs); i++) {
nprocs = maxnprocs;
- dotest_iteration(i*(MSGMNI / maxnprocs));
+ dotest_iteration(i * maxnprocs);
}
nprocs = MSGMNI % maxnprocs;
- dotest_iteration(i*(MSGMNI / maxnprocs));
+ dotest_iteration(i * maxnprocs);
}
tst_resm(TPASS, "Test ran successfully!");
Regards,
Jan
>
> if ((pid = FORK_OR_VFORK()) < 0)
> tst_brkm(TFAIL, cleanup,
> --
> 2.17.0
>
>
> --
> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-09 10:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-08 9:33 [LTP] [PATCH] msgstress04: make sure not pass IPC_PRIVATE to msgget kai.kang
2018-11-09 10:24 ` Jan Stancek [this message]
2018-11-12 7:16 ` Kang Kai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1149365280.71650211.1541759040124.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
--to=jstancek@redhat.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox