public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [RFC] new LTP testrunner
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 10:33:29 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1174539544.33712886.1531838009077.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180717114328.GB27873@rei>


----- Original Message -----
> Hi!
> I've been playing with the idea of replacing the runltp + ltp-pan with
> something more modern and prototyped another take on the new LTP
> testrunner during this SUSE hackweek.
> 
> The key point of the new testrunner is that the logic that executes the
> testcases and writes down the test results is being run on a separate
> machine so that we can outlive and recover from kernel crashes.

Hi,

first impression comments below. I know you want
to avoid "one solution fits all", but I'm listing
some RFEs that I think are common.

- "installation of the system is left out"
Agreed, there are many provisioning solutions out there.

- replacing runltp + ltp-pan
What I'm missing is the local use-case we have now. Something
like backend:local, that will run the test on local system
and produce same format of results. ssh into localhost
adds complexity - some test wrapper might not know the
password for system it has been spawned on.

The way we coped with (fatal) issues is pre-processing
runtest files based on kernel version, package versions,
architecture, etc.

IMO backend:local (and ssh) might be closest to what people do now.

- RFE: filter tests
have ability to run only some tests based on some filter
which is very common question I get about runltp

- RFE: skip build/installation
for some cross-compiling users
  
- "All backends needs to be able to reach internet"
Why is this needed?

Regards,
Jan

> 
> It's still in a proof-of-concept state but I've been able to execute the
> CVE testrun or older distributions under qemu and outlive several kernel
> crashes:
> 
> http://metan.ucw.cz/outgoing/cve.html
> 
> As well as to run the same testrun on RPI over SSH and reboot it via
> relay connected to the reset pin header when the kernel has crashed:
> 
> http://metan.ucw.cz/outgoing/rpi.html
> 
> The code with a short README could be found here:
> 
> https://github.com/metan-ucw/ltp/tree/master/tools/runltp-ng
> 
> --
> Cyril Hrubis
> chrubis@suse.cz
> 
> --
> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-17 14:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-17 11:43 [LTP] [RFC] new LTP testrunner Cyril Hrubis
2018-07-17 14:33 ` Jan Stancek [this message]
2018-07-17 14:45   ` Cyril Hrubis
2018-07-17 15:28     ` Jan Stancek
2018-07-17 15:37       ` Cyril Hrubis
2018-07-18  1:27   ` Daniel Sangorrin
2018-07-18  8:52     ` Cyril Hrubis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1174539544.33712886.1531838009077.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
    --to=jstancek@redhat.com \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox