From: Subrata Modak <subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Cc: ltp-list <ltp-list@lists.sf.net>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] Add eventfd2_03 test for eventfd2() syscall [Earlier Subject: (testing)improve support for semaphore-like behavior]
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 00:45:37 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1245093337.4871.37.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090612132102.32046.21700.sendpatchset@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com>
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 18:51 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> >On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 19:50 -0700, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> >On Fri, 12 Jun 2009, Subrata Modak wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Davide,
> > >
> > > Your had introduced an improvement to support for semaphore-like
> > > behavior in eventfd for linux-2.6.30. And also have a small test program
> > > envisaged through:
> > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=bcd0b235bf3808dec5115c381cd55568f63b85f0,
> > > http://www.xmailserver.org/eventfd-sem.c,
> > >
> > > Would you be willing to share this test program for inclusion in Linux
> > > Test Project (http://ltp.sourceforge.net/) under GPLv2 ? If affirmative,
> > > can you confirm by replying to this mail with your consent/Sign-off.
> >
> > Sure, it's all yours ;)
Thanks David.
Regards--
Subrata
>
> So, here it goes. The following patch integrates this to LTP.
>
> Signed-off-by: Subrata Modak <subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Original-author-and-copyright-holder: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
> To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
> Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
> Cc: ltp-list <ltp-list@lists.sf.net>
> ---
>
> --- ltp-full-20090531.orig/runtest/syscalls 2009-06-12 17:03:15.000000000 +0530
> +++ ltp-full-20090531/runtest/syscalls 2009-06-12 18:13:49.000000000 +0530
> @@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ eventfd01 eventfd01
>
> eventfd2_01 eventfd2_01
> eventfd2_02 eventfd2_02
> +eventfd2_03 eventfd2_03
>
> execl01 execl01
> execle01 execle01
> --- ltp-full-20090531.orig/testcases/kernel/syscalls/eventfd2/eventfd2_03.c 1970-01-01 05:30:00.000000000 +0530
> +++ ltp-full-20090531/testcases/kernel/syscalls/eventfd2/eventfd2_03.c 2009-06-12 18:17:49.000000000 +0530
> @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
> +/*
> + * eventfd-sem by Davide Libenzi (Simple test for eventfd sempahore)
> + * Copyright (C) 2009 Davide Libenzi
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
> + * (at your option) any later version.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> + *
> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> + * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
> + * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA
> + *
> + * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
> + * Reference: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=bcd0b235bf3808dec5115c381cd55568f63b85f0
> + * Reference: http://www.xmailserver.org/eventfd-sem.c
> + * eventfd: testing improved support for semaphore-like behavior in linux-2.6.30
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#include <sys/types.h>
> +#include <sys/syscall.h>
> +#include <sys/stat.h>
> +#include <fcntl.h>
> +#include <stdlib.h>
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +#include <string.h>
> +#include <unistd.h>
> +#include <errno.h>
> +
> +char *TCID = "eventfd2_02"; /* test program identifier*/
> +
> +#ifndef EFD_SEMLIKE
> +#define EFD_SEMLIKE (1 << 0)
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifndef __NR_eventfd2
> +#if defined(__x86_64__)
> +#define __NR_eventfd2 290
> +#elif defined(__i386__)
> +#define __NR_eventfd2 328
> +#else
> +#error Cannot detect your architecture!
> +#endif
> +#endif
> +
> +
> +static int eventfd2(int count, int flags) {
> + return syscall(__NR_eventfd2, count, flags);
> +}
> +
> +static void xsem_wait(int fd) {
> + u_int64_t cntr;
> +
> + if (read(fd, &cntr, sizeof(cntr)) != sizeof(cntr)) {
> + perror("reading eventfd");
> + exit(1);
> + }
> + fprintf(stdout, "[%u] wait completed on %d: count=%llu\n",
> + getpid(), fd, cntr);
> +}
> +
> +static void xsem_post(int fd, int count) {
> + u_int64_t cntr = count;
> +
> + if (write(fd, &cntr, sizeof(cntr)) != sizeof(cntr)) {
> + perror("writing eventfd");
> + exit(1);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void sem_player(int fd1, int fd2) {
> + fprintf(stdout, "[%u] posting 1 on %d\n", getpid(), fd1);
> + xsem_post(fd1, 1);
> +
> + fprintf(stdout, "[%u] waiting on %d\n", getpid(), fd2);
> + xsem_wait(fd2);
> +
> + fprintf(stdout, "[%u] posting 1 on %d\n", getpid(), fd1);
> + xsem_post(fd1, 1);
> +
> + fprintf(stdout, "[%u] waiting on %d\n", getpid(), fd2);
> + xsem_wait(fd2);
> +
> + fprintf(stdout, "[%u] posting 5 on %d\n", getpid(), fd1);
> + xsem_post(fd1, 5);
> +
> + fprintf(stdout, "[%u] waiting 5 times on %d\n", getpid(), fd2);
> + xsem_wait(fd2);
> + xsem_wait(fd2);
> + xsem_wait(fd2);
> + xsem_wait(fd2);
> + xsem_wait(fd2);
> +}
> +
> +static void usage(char const *prg) {
> + fprintf(stderr, "use: %s [-h]\n", prg);
> +}
> +
> +int main (int argc, char **argv) {
> + int c, fd1, fd2, status;
> + pid_t cpid_poster, cpid_waiter;
> +
> + while ((c = getopt(argc, argv, "h")) != -1) {
> + switch (c) {
> + default:
> + usage(argv[0]);
> + return 1;
> + }
> + }
> + if ((fd1 = eventfd2(0, EFD_SEMLIKE)) == -1 ||
> + (fd2 = eventfd2(0, EFD_SEMLIKE)) == -1) {
> + perror("eventfd2");
> + return 1;
> + }
> + if ((cpid_poster = fork()) == 0) {
> + sem_player(fd1, fd2);
> + exit(0);
> + }
> + if ((cpid_waiter = fork()) == 0) {
> + sem_player(fd2, fd1);
> + exit(0);
> + }
> + waitpid(cpid_poster, &status, 0);
> + waitpid(cpid_waiter, &status, 0);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +
>
> ---
> Regards--
> Subrata
>
> >
> > - Davide
> >
> >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited
royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing
server and web deployment.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-15 19:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-12 13:21 [LTP] [PATCH] Add eventfd2_03 test for eventfd2() syscall [Earlier Subject: (testing)improve support for semaphore-like behavior] Subrata Modak
2009-06-15 19:15 ` Subrata Modak [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1245093337.4871.37.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com \
--to=subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=ltp-list@lists.sf.net \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox