public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Subrata Modak <subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Gowrishankar <gowrishankar.m@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: ltp-list <ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	Nadia Derbey <Nadia.Derbey@bull.net>,
	gowrishankar.muthukrishna@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] testcase pidns20, pidns21 on pid namespace
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:18:21 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1245768501.4860.56.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1234762145.7791.13.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com>

On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 10:59 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: 
> Thanks Suka,
> 
> On Sat, 2009-02-14 at 12:31 -0800, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> > Subrata Modak [subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com] wrote:
> > | 
> > | > > pidns21:
> > | > >    The pidns21.c testcase verifies that container-init is terminated
> > | > >    by SIGUSR1 when:
> > | > >       - a handler is specified for SIGUSR1,
> > | > >       - container-init blocks SIGUSR1,
> > | > >       - parent queues SIGUSR1 and
> > | > >       - handler for SIGUSR1 is set to system default before SIGUSR1 is 
> > | > > unblocked.
> > 
> > I know I had acked this test before, but back then the actual implementation
> > of the signal semantics in the kernel were not complete.
> > 
> > To simplify the implementation of the semantics, it was decided that
> > SIGKILL/SIGSTOP would be the only reliable signals from a parent
> > container. IOW, container-init would ignore SIGUSR1 or SIGINT, SIGQUIT
> > etc even if sent from a parent container.
> > 
> > See patchset/discussion:
> > 
> > 	http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/17/131
> > 
> > (which is not yet merged, but appears to be close to consensus)
> > 
> > The  rationale for this simplification is that any serious
> > 'container-init' would explicitly SIG_IGN all signals that it is
> > not interested in. So the only signals that would be in SIG_DFL
> > state would be SIGKILL/SIGSTOP.
> > 
> > Effectively, testcase pidns21 will fail if/when the above patchset
> > (specifically, patch 5/6) is merged.
> 
> Gowri,
> 
> Kindly update this test when the patch makes into next stable kernel
> release.

Suka/Gowri,

Are we still looking into these tests ?

Regards--
Subrata

> 
> Regards--
> Subrata
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
> -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
> -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
> -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
> _______________________________________________
> Ltp-list mailing list
> Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you an open source citizen? Join us for the Open Source Bridge conference!
Portland, OR, June 17-19. Two days of sessions, one day of unconference: $250.
Need another reason to go? 24-hour hacker lounge. Register today!
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;215844324;13503038;v?http://opensourcebridge.org
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

       reply	other threads:[~2009-06-23 14:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <4948C6E4.8080801@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
     [not found] ` <49491512.9000905@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
     [not found]   ` <1229578051.5149.11.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com>
     [not found]     ` <20090214203139.GA10969@us.ibm.com>
     [not found]       ` <1234762145.7791.13.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com>
2009-06-23 14:48         ` Subrata Modak [this message]
2009-11-10  5:16           ` [LTP] [PATCH] testcase pidns20, pidns21 on pid namespace Rishikesh
2009-11-11  0:10             ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-11-11 15:59               ` Subrata Modak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1245768501.4860.56.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com \
    --to=subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=Nadia.Derbey@bull.net \
    --cc=gowrishankar.m@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=gowrishankar.muthukrishna@gmail.com \
    --cc=ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox