From: Subrata Modak <subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Gowrishankar <gowrishankar.m@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: ltp-list <ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Nadia Derbey <Nadia.Derbey@bull.net>,
gowrishankar.muthukrishna@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] testcase pidns20, pidns21 on pid namespace
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:18:21 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1245768501.4860.56.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1234762145.7791.13.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com>
On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 10:59 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> Thanks Suka,
>
> On Sat, 2009-02-14 at 12:31 -0800, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> > Subrata Modak [subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com] wrote:
> > |
> > | > > pidns21:
> > | > > The pidns21.c testcase verifies that container-init is terminated
> > | > > by SIGUSR1 when:
> > | > > - a handler is specified for SIGUSR1,
> > | > > - container-init blocks SIGUSR1,
> > | > > - parent queues SIGUSR1 and
> > | > > - handler for SIGUSR1 is set to system default before SIGUSR1 is
> > | > > unblocked.
> >
> > I know I had acked this test before, but back then the actual implementation
> > of the signal semantics in the kernel were not complete.
> >
> > To simplify the implementation of the semantics, it was decided that
> > SIGKILL/SIGSTOP would be the only reliable signals from a parent
> > container. IOW, container-init would ignore SIGUSR1 or SIGINT, SIGQUIT
> > etc even if sent from a parent container.
> >
> > See patchset/discussion:
> >
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/17/131
> >
> > (which is not yet merged, but appears to be close to consensus)
> >
> > The rationale for this simplification is that any serious
> > 'container-init' would explicitly SIG_IGN all signals that it is
> > not interested in. So the only signals that would be in SIG_DFL
> > state would be SIGKILL/SIGSTOP.
> >
> > Effectively, testcase pidns21 will fail if/when the above patchset
> > (specifically, patch 5/6) is merged.
>
> Gowri,
>
> Kindly update this test when the patch makes into next stable kernel
> release.
Suka/Gowri,
Are we still looking into these tests ?
Regards--
Subrata
>
> Regards--
> Subrata
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
> -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
> -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
> -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
> _______________________________________________
> Ltp-list mailing list
> Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you an open source citizen? Join us for the Open Source Bridge conference!
Portland, OR, June 17-19. Two days of sessions, one day of unconference: $250.
Need another reason to go? 24-hour hacker lounge. Register today!
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;215844324;13503038;v?http://opensourcebridge.org
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
next parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-23 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4948C6E4.8080801@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <49491512.9000905@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <1229578051.5149.11.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <20090214203139.GA10969@us.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <1234762145.7791.13.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com>
2009-06-23 14:48 ` Subrata Modak [this message]
2009-11-10 5:16 ` [LTP] [PATCH] testcase pidns20, pidns21 on pid namespace Rishikesh
2009-11-11 0:10 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-11-11 15:59 ` Subrata Modak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1245768501.4860.56.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com \
--to=subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=Nadia.Derbey@bull.net \
--cc=gowrishankar.m@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=gowrishankar.muthukrishna@gmail.com \
--cc=ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox