From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sfi-mx-3.v28.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.28.123] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by h25xhf1.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MJlhO-0000Cb-Tn for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:56:54 +0000 Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.151]) by 3b2kzd1.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) id 1MJlhO-0000s3-2m for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:56:54 +0000 Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.106]) by e33.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n5P9slSl032740 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 03:54:47 -0600 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (d03av01.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.167]) by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.2) with ESMTP id n5P9urg2181588 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 03:56:53 -0600 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n5P9uqw7032563 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 03:56:53 -0600 From: Subrata Modak In-Reply-To: <200906231712.08545.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <4a413aa8.8d13f30a.1754.ffffd0c3SMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> <200906231712.08545.vapier@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:40:03 +0530 Message-Id: <1245921004.5542.38.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] Fix a surprising error in cacheflush01 test Reply-To: subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com List-Id: Linux Test Project General Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-list-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Jiri Palecek Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net, Mike Frysinger Satus-quo unchanged. I think this was meant to be only for mips, so, why even try to see if it can build on others ? Regards-- Subrata On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 17:12 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Friday 19 June 2009 10:13:25 Jiri Palecek > wrote: > > this patch fixes a strange build failure in the cacheflush test. Also, it > > makes the condition where it is build a little broader. > > a little too broad -- you probably broke arm systems with this as they define > __NR_cacheflush but not asm/cachectl.h > > > -#if defined __mips__ > > + > > +#if defined __NR_cacheflush > > #include > > for using the systemcall you should use __NR_cacheflush. for the header, you > should use autoconf. > -mike > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Ltp-list mailing list > Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list