From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sfi-mx-1.v28.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.28.121] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by 235xhf1.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MLVWK-0004vP-Sl for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 05:04:40 +0000 Received: from e8.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.138]) by 29vjzd1.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) id 1MLVV0-0002jV-RR for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 05:04:33 +0000 Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234]) by e8.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n5U4qTt2022173 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:52:29 -0400 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (d01av02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.216]) by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.2) with ESMTP id n5U53GDH252414 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 01:03:16 -0400 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av02.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n5U50pgS007709 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 01:00:51 -0400 From: Subrata Modak In-Reply-To: <1246330572.12836.40.camel@yhuang-dev.sh.intel.com> References: <1246330572.12836.40.camel@yhuang-dev.sh.intel.com> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:32:29 +0530 Message-Id: <1246338149.4819.1.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [LTP] Integration of MCE test suite into LTP Reply-To: subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com List-Id: Linux Test Project General Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-list-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Huang Ying Cc: Andi Kleen , ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 10:56 +0800, Huang Ying wrote: > Hi, All, > > We are working on a test suite to test the Linux kernel MCE handling > logic named mce-test, which can be find at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/cpu/mce/mce-test.git. There is a > HOWTO for it, which is attached with the mail. > > We think the testing target of mce-test is part of that of LTP, so it is > better to integrate mce-test into LTP. Do you think so? > > As for integration scheme, maybe we can first add mce-test into LTP as a > separate test case, just as kdump test case. What's your opinions? > > Any comment is welcome! > > Best Regards, > Huang Ying Hi Huang, I will reply to this mail in detail later. Thanks for posting this information. Regards-- Subrata > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Ltp-list mailing list > Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list