From: Subrata Modak <subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: naresh kamboju <naresh.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiri Palecek <jpalecek@web.de>,
Pradeep K Surisetty <pradeepkumars@in.ibm.com>,
ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] Re::personality test case build fails
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:34:14 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1246356254.4819.39.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f5a7b3810906300250o6ee16e3bv672ad77018d34a81@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 15:20 +0530, naresh kamboju wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Subrata
> Modak<subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 17:03 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> >> > >+#ifdef __NR_personality
> >> >
> >> > Instead of using
> >> > #ifdef __NR_personality
> >> > in test code, Better we will add these this syscall numbers in the
> >> > ltp/testcases/kernel/include/ARCHXXX.in files.
> >> > This can be Multi ARCH support.
> >> Great. Send me a patch to update them all ;-)
> >>
> >
> > Naresh ??
>
> Hi Subrata,
>
> I have noticed some issue with personality01.c and personality02.c
> test cases in design.
Great. And what design reviews for the newly ported tests in LTP ?
Regards--
Subrata
> Currently I am investigating and get back to in short.
>
> Best Regards
> Naresh Kamboju
>
> >
> >> Regards--
> >> Subrata
> >>
> >> > Jiri,
> >> > I think you are doing Multi ARCH support right?
> >> >
> >> > Your suggestions are welcome :)
> >> >
> >> > Best regards
> >> > Naresh Kamboju
>
> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Ltp-list mailing list
> >> Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
> >
> >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-30 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-25 12:17 [LTP] [PATCH] Re::personality test case build fails naresh kamboju
2009-06-26 11:33 ` Subrata Modak
2009-06-30 7:41 ` Subrata Modak
2009-06-30 9:50 ` naresh kamboju
2009-06-30 10:04 ` Subrata Modak [this message]
2009-06-30 12:59 ` naresh kamboju
2009-06-30 13:18 ` Subrata Modak
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-06-25 11:34 Subrata Modak
2009-06-30 7:41 ` Subrata Modak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1246356254.4819.39.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com \
--to=subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jpalecek@web.de \
--cc=ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=naresh.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=pradeepkumars@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox