From: Subrata Modak <subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: naresh kamboju <naresh.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net,
Brandon Philips <bphilips@suse.de>,
maxin john <maxinbjohn@gmail.com>,
Manas Kumar Nayak <maknayak@in.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [FIX PATCHES] ltp-mq_unlink_speculative_7-2
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:43:42 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1246454022.6978.54.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f5a7b3810907010146s247bfbc0w3e6ca9213a927d7@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 14:16 +0530, naresh kamboju wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Subrata
> Modak<subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > Hi Naresh,
> >
> > On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 13:12 +0530, naresh kamboju wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have noticed failure under open_posix_testsuite for
> >> mq_unlink/speculative/7-2.c and fixed.
> >> After changing the uninitialized to initialized char array of mqname[]
> >> test case got PASSED.
> >
> > Great. Could you also please share with us the test results before and
> > after this patch ?
>
> Before patch Results:
>
> conformance/interfaces/mq_unlink/speculative/7-2: execution: FAILED
> # ./7-2.test
> Test FAILED, error is Invalid argument
>
> After patch Results:
>
> conformance/interfaces/mq_unlink/speculative/7-2: execution: PASS
> # ./7-2.test
> Test PASSED
Thanks. What better way to start July to checkin your patch.
Regards--
Subrata
>
>
> Best regards,
> Naresh Kamboju
>
> >
> > Regards--
> > Subrata
> >
> >>
> >> I have attached patch and below.
> >> Please review the same.
> >>
> >>
> >> Best Regards
> >> Naresh Kamboju
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Naresh Kamboju < naresh.kernel@gmail.com >
> >>
> >>
> >> diff -Naurb a/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/mq_unlink/speculative/7-2.c
> >> b/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/mq_unlink/speculative/7-2.c
> >> --- a/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/mq_unlink/speculative/7-2.c
> >> 2005-06-03 22:00:59.000000000 +0530
> >> +++ b/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/mq_unlink/speculative/7-2.c
> >> 2009-06-30 12:37:35.000000000 +0530
> >> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
> >>
> >> int main()
> >> {
> >> - char mqname[50];
> >> + char mqname[50]="/123";
> >>
> >> // sprintf(mqname, FUNCTION "_" TEST "_%d", getpid());
> >
> >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-01 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-30 7:42 [LTP] [FIX PATCHES] ltp-mq_unlink_speculative_7-2 naresh kamboju
2009-06-30 10:46 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2009-06-30 11:12 ` Subrata Modak
2009-07-01 8:46 ` naresh kamboju
2009-07-01 13:13 ` Subrata Modak [this message]
2009-07-01 13:33 ` naresh kamboju
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1246454022.6978.54.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com \
--to=subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=bphilips@suse.de \
--cc=ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=maknayak@in.ibm.com \
--cc=maxinbjohn@gmail.com \
--cc=naresh.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox